DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TV토론회에서 트위터가 선거에 미치는 영향 -제18대 대통령 선거 TV토론회를 중심으로-

Twitter's impact on the election of TV debates -18th presidential election TV debates-

  • 한창진 (전남대학교 대학원 디지털컨버전스협동과정) ;
  • 김경수 (전남대학교 대학원 디지털컨버전스협동과정)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.23
  • 심사 : 2013.06.19
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

제18대 대통령선거 TV 토론회는 SNS 중 트위터의 참여가 많았다. 매스미디어에서 미디어웹 2.0을 통해 SNS와 결합한 소셜미디어시대가 도래하면서 변화가 시작된 것이다. 트위터리안들이 후보자의 발언을 듣고 인터넷이나 스마트폰을 이용하여 검색과 트윗, 리트윗을 하면서 정책 이슈, 의제를 형성하였고, 트윗 수가 최고인 이슈는 발언 즉시 만들어졌다. 내용 중에는 진보성향의 트윗이 많았고, 네거티브적인 내용은 핵심키워드를 자주 거론하지 않아도 트윗 수가 많아 정책 이슈가 되었다. 인기 리트윗은 이슈와 상관없이 토론회 과정을 평가하는 형식이었다. 이렇게 트위터가 TV 보완재가 되어 트위터 여론을 만들었다. SNS 트위터가 TV와 결합하면서 유권자들의 투표 참여와 직접 민주주의 실현 계기가 되었다. 앞으로 TV토론회에서 TV 화면에 실시간 트위터 지지율을 자막으로 표시한다면 선거에서 트위터 영향력은 더 확대될 것으로 전망된다.

It was the 18th presidential election TV debate Twitter participation of SNS. Began to diverge as the era of social media, combined with SNS through in the mass media, media web 2.0. Search tweets, retweets, while the formation of policy issues, the agenda of Twitter users to listen to the statements of the candidates using the Internet or a smartphone. The highest number of tweets immediately issue statements were made. Content during the progressive tweets core keywords you do not often discussed, followed by the negative information increases the number of tweets has become a policy issue. Top retweets was to evaluate the process of debate, regardless of the issue. Tweeter complements the TV so Twitter has made public opinion. Smart phones and SNS Twitter, combined with the TV and the participation and direct democracy, voters vote one instrument was realized. Should forward approval ratings, real-time Twitter subtitles on the TV screen in TV debate Twitter influence in the election will be greatly expanded.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. H. Choi, & D. S. Han, "Study on the agenda of politicians, twitter and newspapers", broadcast news on the correlation. Speech science research, 11, No. 2, pp501-532. 2011.
  2. B. R. Jung, "Watching TV, SNS.Messenger and are meeting." blotter.net, March 12, 2013.
  3. K. I. Ko, "A Method for semantically binding a Data Service to a Broadcasting Program". Journal of Digital Contents Society Vol. 13 No. 4 Dec. 2012. pp. 539-545. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2012.13.4.539
  4. J. G. Song, S. H. Park, "17 presidential election TV debate in the political behavior of voters motivated by the impact on research", Korea Press Gazette, vol 53 (3), pp417-442. 2009.
  5. Benoit, W. L., & Brazeal, L. M. "A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates".2002. Argumentation & Advocacy, 38, 219-233.
  6. IDG Tech Library, "Big data, to fully understand! Big Data Analysis Techniques ", 2012.
  7. H. Kim, "Playground Advanced professionals not anymore", EBN, Jan 2, 2013
  8. D. Y. J. Park, "Agenda-setting effect of Twitter Research: The 19th National Assembly election issues," dissertation, Graduate School of Hanyang University. 2012.
  9. E. I. Gim, Domestic politicians use social media beha vioral research - Twitter, Ewha Womans University, Graduate School of dissertation. 2010.
  10. G. S. Bae. "Way of communicating research social media - Twitter representation and communication structure", Graduate School, Chonnam National University and a master's degree thesis. 2012.
  11. J. H. Hong. & M. G. Park. Research of candidates and voters, the political action political action during the presidential campaign appeared on Twitter. "Cyber Communication Gazette", 28 (4). 2011.
  12. Korea Institute of parties. "Chapter 18 Effects electi on candidates TV debate". Research project in 2012 the Central Election Debate broadcast result report 19, 2013.
  13. J. S. Min, Twitter and on Twitter using the form of political participation: "Press Science Research", 12 (2), 274 - 303. 2012.
  14. S. H. Yun, "Social TV Revolution".Seoul: e Biz Books, 2012.

피인용 문헌

  1. Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology vol.17, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915585954
  2. 주가지수 방향성 예측을 위한 도메인 맞춤형 감성사전 구축방안 vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2017.18.3.585
  3. Investigating the Relationship between Cross-cutting Exposure on Social Media and Opinion Extremity: Focusing on Encountering, Interacting, and Avoiding Disagreement vol.21, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.1261