DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Parametric Study on Geogrid-Reinforced Track Substructure

  • Oh, Jeongho (Department of Railroad Facility Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the effectiveness of geogrid for conventional ballasted track and asphalt concrete underlayment track using PLAXIS finite element program. Geogrid element was modeled at various locations that include subballast/subgrade, subballast/ballast interfaces, middle of the ballast, and one-third depth of the ballast. The results revealed that the effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement appeared to be larger for ballasted track structure compared to asphalt concrete underlayment track. Particularly, in case of installing geogrid at one-third depth of ballast layer in a conventional ballasted track, the most effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement was achieved. The influence of geogrid axial stiffness on track substructure response was not clear to conclude. Further validations using a discrete element method along with experimental investigation are considered as a future study. The effect of asphalt concrete layer modulus was evaluated. The results exhibited that higher layer modulus seems to be effective in controlling displacement and strain of track substructure. However it also yields slightly higher stresses within track substructure. It infers that further validations are required to come up with optimum asphalt concrete mixture design to meet economical and functional criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Mittal, S., Sharma, A. K., Lokesh, B. V., and Dwivedi, A. (2008). "Study of Behaviour of Ballast Using Geosynthetics," Proceedings of the 4th Asian Conference on Geosynthetics, June, Shanghai, China, pp.656-917.
  2. Indraratan, B., Nimbalkar, S., Christie, D., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., and Vinod, J (2010). "Field Assessment of the performance of a Ballasted Rail Track with and without Geosynthetics," Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, pp.907-917.
  3. Mishra D., Kazmee, H., Tutumluer, E., Pforr, J., Read, D., and Gehringer, E. (2013). "Characterization of Railroad Ballast Behavior under Repeated Loading using A New Large Triaxial Test Setup", Journal of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, Washington, DC, (in press).
  4. Brinkgreve, R.B.J., Broere, W, and Waterman, D. (2006). PLAXIS Version 8 Manual. The Netherlands.
  5. Teixeira, P.F., Pita, A. L., and Ferreira, P.A. (2010). "New possibilities to reduce track costs on high-speed lines using a bituminous sub-ballast layer" International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298431003749733
  6. Rose, J.G., Brown, J.D., Agarwal, N.K., Ilavala, N. (2010) KENTRACK, A performance-Based Layered Elastic Railway Trackbed Structural Design and Analysis Procedure - A Tutorial Proceedings of the 2010 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2010, Urbana, Illinois, USA, JRC2010-36067.
  7. American Railway Engineering Association (AREA). (1996). Manual for railway engineering, Vol. 1, AREA, Washington, D.C.
  8. US Army Corps of Engineers (2000). Railroad Design and Rehabilitation, TI 850-02, Air Force AFMAN 32-1125 (I).

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of the Relationship between Geogrid Rib Size and Particle Size Distribution of Ballast Materials using Discrete Element Method vol.36, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2016.36.1.0143
  2. Evaluation of Geogrid-Reinforced Track substructure Effectiveness Using A Large-Scale Pullout Device vol.10, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15683/kosd.2014.10.1.040
  3. A Study on Effect of Geogrid Reinforced- Crushed stone Sub-base in Permeable Pavement System vol.6, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2015.6.4.064
  4. Influence of Under Sleeper Pads on Ballast Behavior Under Cyclic Loading: Experimental and Numerical Studies vol.144, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001954