DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic Review of Research into the Psychological Aspects of Prostate Cancer in Asia: What do we Know?

  • 발행 : 2013.04.30

초록

Background: To review the peer reviewed literature on the psychological aspects of the prostate cancer experience of men in Asia. Materials and Methods: Medline and PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Web of Science (1999 - November Week 4, 2012) were searched. Inclusion criteria were: included men with prostate cancer and/or their partners or caregivers who identify as Asian recruited in an Asian country; and assessed health-related quality of life, psychological and social adjustment relating to prostate cancer and published in English after $1^{st}$ January 1999 and prior to $30^{th}$ November, 2012. Study aims; design; quality; level of evidence, and key results were assessed. Results: 43 articles met all inclusion criteria and were retained for initial review. Of these most focussed on health-related QOL with only five evidence Level IV studies from Japan and Taiwan including a specific psychological focus. Of these, one was a cross-sectional case control study; three were cross-sectional descriptive quantitative designs; one was a cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. From the data available, a substantive sub group of men with prostate cancer (approximately one third) in these countries experience clinically high psychological distress and decision regret. Conclusions: Research on the psychological needs of men with the increasingly prevalent condition of prostate cancer in Asian countries is scant with only a small number of low level evidence descriptive studies identified. Future research to underpin the development and evaluation of effective and culturally relevant psychological and supportive care interventions for such men is urgently needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baade P, Youlden DR, Cramb S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA (2012). Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer in the Asia-Pacific Region. In Press.
  2. Baade PD, Youlden DR, Krnjacki LJ (2009). International epidemiology of prostate cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends. Molecular Nutrition and Food Res, 53, 171-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200700511
  3. Bloch S, Love A, Macvean M, et al (2007). Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Bio Psycho Social Med, 1, 2.
  4. Chambers SK, Pinnock C, Lepore SJ, Hughes S, O'Connell DL (2011). A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. Patient Education and Counseling, 85,75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.027
  5. Chambers SK, Ferguson M, Gardiner RA, Aitken J, Occhipinti S (2012a). Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22,1025-34.
  6. Chambers SK, Schover L, Halford K, et al (2012b). A randomosed trial of couples-focussed peer support for men with localised prostate cancer. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncology, 8, 226.
  7. Chambers SK, Schover L, Nielsen L, et al (2013). Couples distress after localised prostate cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, in press, 118, 500-9.
  8. Cheng C, Lo BCY, Chio JHM (2010). The Tao way of Chinese coping. In MH Bond (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 339-420). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
  9. Chwalisz K, Shah SR, Hand Kayla M (2008). Facilitating rigorous qualitative research in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 387-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012998
  10. Couper JW, Bloch S, Love A, et al (2006). The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer on patients and their partners. Med J Australia, 185, 428.
  11. Daly J, Willis K, Small R, et al (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiology, 60, 43-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014
  12. Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Bri J Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-9. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782
  13. Gotay CC, Shimizu H, Muraoka M, et al (2004). Cancer-related attitudes: A comparative study in Japan and the US. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 665-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.792
  14. Hoyt MA, Rubin LR (2012). Gender representation of cancer patients in medical treatment and psychosocial survivorship research. Cancer.
  15. Kumano H, Haseme E, Fujimoto H, et al (2005). Harmony seeking and the risk of prostate cancer: a prebioptic study. J Psychosomatic Res, 59, 167-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.04.006
  16. Lin YH (2011). Treatment decision regret and related factors following radical prostatectomy. Cancer Nursing, 34, 417-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e318206b22b
  17. Lin YH (2012). Comparison of the uncertainty level of radical prostatectomy recipients with or without psychological support. Int J Urological Nursing, 6, 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-771X.2012.01149.x
  18. Long SO, Long BD (1982). Curable cancers and fatal ulcers: Attitudes toward cancer in Japan. Social Science and Med, 16, 2101-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90259-3
  19. Namiki S, Ishidoya S, Ito A, et al (2009). Quality of life after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: a 5-year follow up study. Int J Urology, 16, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02197.x
  20. Namiki S, Saito S, Satoh M, et al (2005). Quality of life after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: 2 year longitudinal study. Jp J Clinical Oncology, 35, 551-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyi145
  21. Namiki S, Saito S, Tochigi T, et al (2007). Impact of salvage therapy for biochemical recurrence on health-related quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Int J urology, 14, 186-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01610.x
  22. Namiki S, Saito S, Tochigi T, et al (2005). Impact of hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy on the recovery of quality of life. Int J Urology, 12, 173-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01014.x
  23. Namiki S, Saito S, Tochigi T, et al (2007). Psychological distress in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer. Int J Urology, 14, 924-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01746.x
  24. NHMRC (2000). How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines Retrieved 11th November, 2011, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/ publications/cp69
  25. Olver I, Vuletich C, Von Dincklage J, et al (2012). Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines using Cancer Council Australia's Cancer Guidelines Wiki Clinical Guidelines Network: Cancer Council Australia, .
  26. Parker G, Gladstone G, Chee KT (2001). Depression in the planet's largest ethnic group: the Chinese. Am J of Psychiatry, 158, 857-64. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.857
  27. Roesch SC, Adams L, Hines A, et al (2005). Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review. J Behavioral Med, 28, 281-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-4664-z
  28. Sato RS, Beppu H, Iba N, Sawada A (2012). The meaning of life prognosis disclosure for Japanese cancer patients: a qualitative study of patients' narratives. Chronic Illness, 8, 225-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395312448940
  29. Smith DP, Supramaniam R, King MT, et al (2007). Age, health, and education determine supportive care needs of men younger than 70 years with prostate cancer. J Clinical Oncology, 25, 2560-6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.8046
  30. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2004). Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology, 63, 751-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.017
  31. Steginga SK, Turner E, Donovan J (2008). The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research. World J Urology, 26, 469-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0279-7
  32. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, et al (2001). The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<66::AID-PON493>3.0.CO;2-Z
  33. Sugimoto M, Takegami M, Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Kakehi Y (2008). Health-related quality of life in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer: Assessment with the SF-8. Int J Urology, 15, 524-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02046.x
  34. Wakatsuki M, Tsuji H, Ishikawa H, et al (2008). Quality of life in men treated with carbon ion therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 72, 1010-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.035
  35. Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>3.0.CO;2-6

피인용 문헌

  1. A systematic review of psycho-oncology research in Chinese populations: emerging trends vol.22, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12087
  2. Cognitive function in Chinese prostate cancer patients on androgen-deprivation therapy: A cross-sectional study vol.11, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12347
  3. Psycho-oncology assessment in Chinese populations: a systematic review of quality of life and psychosocial measures vol.25, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12367
  4. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of prostate cancer: an update and cumulative meta-analysis vol.40, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/07435800.2014.934961
  5. Love, faith and hope – a secondary analysis of prostate cancer survivors and their partners vol.50, pp.2-3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2015.1101352
  6. Providing prostate cancer survivorship care in Japan: Implications from the USA care model vol.23, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13186
  7. Factors predicting emotional cue-responding behaviors of nurses in Taiwan: An observational study vol.26, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4330
  8. The Impact of Cancer on Psychological and Social Outcomes vol.51, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12165