DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hypothesis on the Role of Cytoplasmic "Short Base Sequences" in Carcinogenesis

  • Zhang, Jing-Yao (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School) ;
  • Xie, Lin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School) ;
  • Tai, Ming-Hui (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School) ;
  • Wu, Qi-Fei (Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School) ;
  • Liu, Chang (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School)
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Cancer is a highly complex medical problem with ramifications for public health throughout the world. Most studies have mainly focused on change in the nuclei as being aetiologically responsible. Few have examined the relationship between the cytoplasm and cancer, despite the fact that research has indicated that the cytoplasmic environment is an important factor for cellular differentiation and that the genetic information provided by the nucleus is entirely dependent on this environment for its expression. Gene mutations may be the result, rather than the cause of carcinogenesis. We submit a new concept - "short base sequences" (50-500 bps, including DNA or RNA sequences) in the cytoplasm which could play an important role in carcinogenesis. This is a new theory to explain the origin of the cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Abken H, Hegger R, Butzler C, Willecke K (1993). Short DNA sequences from the cytoplasm of mouse tumor cells induce immortalization of human lymphocytes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 90, 6518-22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.14.6518
  2. Bjerkvig R, Tysnes BB, Aboody KS, Najbauer J, Terzis AJ (2005). Opinion - The origin of the cancer stem cell: current controversies and new insights. Nat Rev Cancer, 5, 899-904. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1740
  3. Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 490, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11412
  4. Grander D (1998). How do mutated oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes cause cancer? Med Oncol, 15, 20-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787340
  5. Gurdon J (1962). The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. JEmbryol Exp Morphol,10, 622-40.
  6. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144, 646-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  7. Hegger R, Abken H (1995). The short DNA sequences in the cytoplasm of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells are tightly associated with proteins. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR, 27, 321-8.
  8. Nowell PC (1988). Citation classic - the clonal evolution of tumor-cell populations. Curr Cont/Life Sci, 19-19.
  9. Perez-Losada J, Balmain A (2003). Stem-cell hierarchy in skin cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer,3, 434- d43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1095
  10. Vermeulen L, de Sousa e Melo F, Richel DJ, Medema JP (2012). The developing cancer stem-cell model: clinical challenges and opportunities. Lancet Oncol, 13, E83-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70257-1
  11. Weinstein IB (2002). Cancer: Addiction to oncogenes - The Achilles heal of cancer. Science, 297, 63-4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073096
  12. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007). Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature, 447, 661-78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05911