품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제41권2호
  • /
  • Pages.301-322
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP와 QFD를 이용한 철도기술 개선에 관한 실증적 연구

An Empirical Study of Railroad Technology Improvement Using AHP and QFD

  • 김현정 (상지영서대학교 콜매니저경영과) ;
  • 김수욱 (서울대학교 경영학과)
  • Kim, Hyun Jung (Department of Call Manager Business Administration, Sangji Youngseo College) ;
  • Kim, Soo Wook (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.10
  • 심사 : 2013.06.17
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aims to determine the needs of customers who use railroads as a mode of transportation and propose customer-oriented improvements in railroad technology by making connections between customer needs and railroad technology. Methods: We primarily used two methods for this study, AHP and QFD. First, AHP was used to evaluate the relative importance among the different components of railroad technology. Second, the QFD was applied to make a link between customer needs and railroad technology. Results: Railroad technology is largely divided into development, maintenance, and support. Empirical results showed the following improvement priorities in development, vehicle, system, line, signal/communication, power, and structure, in maintenance, vehicle, signal/communication, line, process, power, and structure, and in support, safety/precaution, management, environmental energy, operations/logistics, and station. Conclusion: Recognizing limitations in measuring the level of railroad technology when using the existing 'Technology Growth Model,' we used AHP and QFD to explore improvement directions for customer-oriented railroad technology. By offering customer-oriented services based on this study, railroad service providers will be able to acquire competitive advantage in the market.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Babakus, E., and Boller, G. W. 1992. "An Empirical Assessment of the SERVQUAL Scale." Journal of Business Research 24(3):253-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90022-4
  2. Byun, Sunchun, Yoo, Jiyeon, and Son, Sukho. 2008. A Dynamic Technology Level Evaluation Method Based on Technology Model. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.
  3. Cronin Jr, J. J., and Taylor, S. A. 1992. "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension." Journal of Marketing 56(3):55-68.
  4. Escobar, M. T., Aguaron, J., and Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. 2004. "A Note on AHP Group Consistency for the Row Geometric Mean Priorization Procedure." European Journal of Operational Research 153(2):318-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1
  5. Gleave, S. D. 2000. Rail Passenger Quality of Service Valuation. Shadow Strategic Rail Authority.
  6. Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D. 1988. "The House of Quality." Harvard Business Review 66(May-June):63-73.
  7. Jang, Sueun, and Jung, Kyuhwa. 2007. "An Improved Methodology for Estimating Traffic Accident Cost Savings in the (Preliminary) Assessment of Railway Projects." Journal of Korean Society of Transportation 25(5):15-21.
  8. Kim, Hojung, and Kim, Jonghak. 2006. A Study on the Development and Application of Transportation Services Index. Korea Transport Institute.
  9. Kim, Jinho, and Hwang, Inkeuk. 2004. "Development of Customer-Oriented Quality Design Elements of Shoes Based on QFD." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 32(1):130-143.
  10. Kim, Sunghong. 2012. "A Study on the Priorities of Quality Dimensions for the Quality Competitive Advantage." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40(2):156-165. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.2.156
  11. Kim, Yeonkyu. 2003. "The Development of Performance Measures in Railway Services." Korean Society for Railway Spring Conference.
  12. Korea Transport Institute. 2006. Collection of KOTI Study Results.
  13. Korea Rail Network Authority. 2005. R&D Planning and Technical Skills Improvement of Korea Rail Network Authority.
  14. Korea Railroad Corporation. 2009. Technology Roadmap for Railway Development.
  15. Korea Railroad Research Institute. 2001. Railway Technology System Establishment through Railway Technology Research and Development.
  16. Korea Railroad Research Institute. 2010. 4th Year Report on the Establishment of Research and Testing Facility for the Advancement of Railway Technology.
  17. Lee, Hyungseok. 2006. "A Study on the Service Quality of Korean Train." Journal of Service Management Society 7(1):125-145.
  18. Lee, Sangbok, and Shin, Dongsul. 2008. Quality Function Deployment Theory and Application. Eretec Press.
  19. Litman, T. A. 2009. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 2nd ed. 1-19.
  20. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2007. Planning Report on Railway Safety Technology Development Project.
  21. Noh, Heemin, Choi, Sunghoon, Kim, S eogwon, and H ong, Sukyoon. 2013. "A Study on Interior Noise Characteristics of High-speed Trains." Journal of the Korean Society for Railway 16(1):14-19. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2013.16.1.014
  22. Prasanta, K. D., Hariharan, S., and Despic, O. 2008. "Managing Healthcare Performance in Analytical Framework." Benchmarking: An International Journal 15(4):444-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810887249
  23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1988. "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality." Journal of Retailing 64(Spring):12-40.
  24. Park, Yongtae. 2006. Management of Technological Knowledge for Next Generation Innovation. Life & Power Press.
  25. Riew, Mooncharn, and Woo, Sungkwon. 2002. "Constructing a Performance Evaluation Model of an R&D Module in Quality Management System Using QFD." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 30(2):1-10.
  26. Saaty, T. L. 1977. "A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures." Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3):234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  27. Saaty, T. L., and Shang, J. S. 2007. "Group Decision-making: Head-count versus Intensity of Preference." Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 41(1):22-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2005.10.001
  28. Teas, R. K. 1993. "Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers' Perceptions of Quality." Journal of Marketing 57(October):18-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252216
  29. Winner, L. 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Boston: MIT Press. Chapter 2.