Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Perception Levels of Diversity on Team Performance: Moderating Effects of Conflict

다양성 지각 정도가 팀의 성과에 미치는 영향: 갈등의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • Yun, Jun Hee (Graduate School of Project Business Administration, Soongsil University) ;
  • Shin, Ho-Chul (College of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
  • 윤준희 (숭실대학교 일반대학원 프로젝트경영학과) ;
  • 신호철 (숭실대학교 경영대학 경영학과)
  • Received : 2013.04.14
  • Accepted : 2013.04.22
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The results of prior studies investigating main effects between diversity and team performance are neither clear nor consistent. This study seeks to provide more evidence for a direct link between these two. The present study also attempts to close a gap in the literature by examining conflict as a moderator of the relationship between diversity and team performance. Methods: As suggested by Williams and O'Reilly(1998), this study examines the effects of perception levels of three specific types of diversity (social category diversity, value diversity, and informational diversity) and two contextual moderators (task conflict and relationship conflict) on team performance. Results: The results show that perception levels of all three types of diversity are significantly related to team performance in the current sample of 313. Results also indicate that relationship conflict significantly interacted with the perception levels of diversity in relating to team performance. Results for task conflict, however, fails to support the hypothesis. Conclusion: The results suggest that the effects of diversity on team functioning depend on how diversity is perceived by team members, rather than actual diversity seen by team members. Theoretical and practical implications are reviewed, and limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are addressed.

Keywords

References

  1. Amason, Allen. 1996. "Distinguishing effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams." Academy of Management Journal 39:123-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/256633
  2. Argyris, Chris. 1962. Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood: Dorsey.
  3. Baron, Robert. 1991. "Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective." Employees Responsibilities and Rights Journal 4:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390436
  4. Brewer, M. B., and Brown, R. J. 1998. "Intergroup relations." In The handbook of social psychology. edited by D. T. Gilbert and S. T. Fiske, (4th ed.) 2:554-94. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Byrne, Donn. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. NewYork: Academic Press.
  6. Bunderson, Stuart, and Sutcliffe, Kathleen. 2002. "Comparing alternative conceptulaizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects." Academy of Management Journal 45:875-893. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069319
  7. Chatman, Jennifer. 1991. "Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms." Administrative Science Quarterly 36:459-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393204
  8. Coser, Lewis. 1970. Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
  9. Cosier, Richard, and Rose, Gerald. 1977. "Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance." Organizational Behavior and Human performance 19:378-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90071-X
  10. Evan, William. 1965. "Conflict and performance in R&D organizations." Industrial Management Review 7:37-46.
  11. Gruenfeld, Deborah, Mannix, Elizabeth, Williams, Katherine, and Neale, Margaret. 1996. "Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061
  12. Homan, Astrid, Greer, Lindred, Jehn, Karen, and Koning, Lukas. 2010. "Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition." Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 13:477-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209350747
  13. Homan, Astrid, Hollenbeck, John, Humphrey, Stephen, van Knippenberg, Daan, Ilgen, Daniel, and Van Kleef, Gerben. 2008. "Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups." Academy of Management Journal 51:1204-22. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732995
  14. Janis, Irving. 1982. Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  15. Jehn, K. A. 1994. "Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of valuebased intragroup conflict." International Journal of Conflict Management 5:223-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022744
  16. Jehn, Karen. 1995. "A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict." Administrative Science Quarterly 40:256-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
  17. Jehn, Karen. 1997. "A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups." Administrative Science Quarterly 42:530-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
  18. Jehn, Karen, Northcraft, Gregory, and Neale, Margaret. 1999. "Why difference makes a difference: a field study of diversity. conflict. and performance in workgroups." Administrative Science Quarterly 44:741-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
  19. Jehn, Karen, and Mannix, Elizabeth. 2001. "The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance." Academy of Management Journal 44:238-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453
  20. Kelly, H. H. 1979. Personal relationships: their structure and prophecies. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  21. Lee, Jun Ho, and Lee, Jin Kyu. 2009. "The Effects of Team Diversity and Moderating Function of Value Sharing." The Korean Journal of Human Resource Management 33(3):95-125.
  22. Lee, Donhee, Kim, Young Sung, Lee, Dongwon, and Cho, Jungrae. 2012. "The evolution of research on quality: Papers published in Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management (2007-2011)." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40:94-105. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.2.094
  23. Milliken, Frances, and Martins, Luis. 1996. "Searching for common threads; Understanding the multiple effects of diversity of in organizational groups." Academy of Management Review 21:402-33.
  24. Mitroff, Ian, Barabba, Vincent, and Kilmann, Ralph. 1977. "The Application of behavioral and philosophical technologies to strategic planning: A case study of a large federal agency." Management Science 23:44-58.
  25. Nemeth, C. J., and Staw, B. M. 1989. "The tradeoffs of social control in groups and organizations" in Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, 22:175-210. New York: Academic Press.
  26. Pelled, Lisa Hope. 1996. "Demographic Diversity, Conflict. and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory." Organizational Science 7:615-31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
  27. Pinkley, Robin. 1990. "Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict." Journal of Applied Psychology 74:117-26.
  28. Putnam, L. 1994. "Productive conflict: Negotiation as implicit coordination." International Journal of Conflict Management 5:285-99.
  29. Randel, Amy. 2002. "Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict." Journal of Organizational Behavior 23:749-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.163
  30. Robbins, Stephen. 1974. Managing Organizational Conflict. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  31. Roh, In-Sung, and Suh, Yung-Ho. 2008. "The effects of management quality on firm performance: Information technology effect." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 36:56-64.
  32. Roloff, M. E. 1987. "Communication and conflict." In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science: 484-534. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  33. Sawyer, John, Houlette, Melissa, and Yeagley, Erin. 2006. "Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006
  34. Schweiger, David, Sandberg, William, and Rechner, Paula. 1989. "Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making," Academy of Management Journal 32:745-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/256567
  35. Schwenk, Charles, and Valacichi, Joseph. 1994. "Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on individuals versus groups." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59:210-22. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1057
  36. Simons, Tony, and Peterson, Randall. 2000. "Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust." Journal of Applied Psychology 85:102-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
  37. Son, Eun-Il, and Jung, Ung-Sub. 2012. "Antecedent and consequences of management quality: Focused on employees of manufacturing industries." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40:199-210. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.2.199
  38. Thomas, K. W. 1979. "Organizational conflict" in Organizational behavior, edited by S. Kerr, 151-84. Columbus: Grid Publishing.
  39. Tjosvold, Dean, Dann, Valerie, and Wong, Choy. 1992. "Managing conflict between departments to serve customers." Human Relation 45:1035-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204501002
  40. Van Maanen, John, and Schein, Edgar. 1979. "Toward a theory of organizational socialization." In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Cummings, L. L, and Staw, B. M., 1:209-64. Greenwich: JAI Press.
  41. Williams, K., and O'Reilly, C. 1998. "The complex of diversity:n A review of forty years of research." In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Sutton, R. I., and Staw, B. M., 20:77140.
  42. Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary, Maloney, Mary, Bhappu, Anita, and Salvador, Rommel. 2008. "When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 107:41-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004