Journal of Environmental Health Sciences (한국환경보건학회지)

Korean Society of Environmental Health (한국환경보건학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium Isolated from Diarrhea Patients in Incheon between 2008 and 2012

최근 5년간 인천지역 설사환자에서 분리한 Salmonella Enteritidis와 Salmonella Typhimurium의 항생제 내성 양상

  • Jang, Jae-Seon (Department of Food & Nutrition, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Jea-Man (Incheon Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Gong, Young-Woo (Incheon Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Yeon (Incheon Research Institute of Public Health and Environment)
  • 장재선 (가천대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이제만 (인천광역시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 공용우 (인천광역시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 이미연 (인천광역시 보건환경연구원)
  • Received : 2013.05.13
  • Accepted : 2013.06.07
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance patterns have been studied with a total of 189 samples of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from diarrhea patients in Incheon from 2008 to 2012. Methods: Antimicrobial resistance tests were determined by Disc Diffusion method. Results: The serological distribution of Salmonella spp. showed 108 strains (30.1%) of S. Enteritidis, 81 strains (22.6%) of S. Typhimirium, eight strains (8.0%) of S. Typhi, 11 strains ( 3.1% ) of S. Paratyphi, and the 151 other strains (42.1%). The separation rate of Salmonella spp. by year showed 14.5% (52 strains) in 2008, 13.6% (49 strains) in 2009, 22.8% (82 strains) in 2010, 25.3% (91 strains) in 2011, and 23.7% (85 strains) in 2012. Additionally, the separation rate of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimirium in 2010 was the highest. The Salmonella spp. isolated from diarrhea patients showed significant differences according to age (p<0.05), gender (p<0.01) and medical institution (p<0.05). The highest resistance was found to the following antimicrobial agents: imipenem 77 strains, ampicillin 47 strains, ciprofloxacin 34 strains, nalidixic acid 29 strains for S. Enteritidis, and ampicillin 45 strains, nalidixic acid 45 strains for S. Typhimurium. Separated S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium resistance to the antibiotics by the year showed significant differences (p<0.05). The patterns of multidrug resistance rates were 43.1% (47 strains) for one drug, 8.3% (9 strains) for two drugs, 11.0% (12 strains) for three drugs, 15.62% (17 strains) for four drugs, and 13.7% (15 strains) for five or more drugs for S. Enteritidis. For S. Tyhpimurium, the rates were 15.0% (12 strains) for one drug, 10.0% (8 strains) for two drugs, 6.3% (five strains) for three drugs, 18.7% (15 strains) for four drugs, and 23.8% (19 strains) for five or more drugs. Conclusion: The antibiotic resistance issue is directly related to people's lives. Thus, the usage of antibiotics should be reduced in order to manage antibiotic resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Souli M, Galani J, Giamarellou H. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant and pandrug resistant gram-negative bacilli in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2008; 13 pii :19045.
  2. Johnson DR, Love-Dixon MA, Brown WJ, Levine DP, Downes FP, Hall WN. Delayed detection of an increase in resistant Acinetobacter baumannii at a Detroit hospital. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13: 394-398. https://doi.org/10.1086/646556
  3. Meyer KS, Urban C, Eagan JA, Berger BJ, Rahal JJ. Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiela spp. Infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119: 353-358. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-5-199309010-00001
  4. Dixon B. Antibiotics as growth promotors : risks and alterative. ASM News. 2000; 66: 264-265.
  5. Jack AH, Robert GA, Carlos FA. Do antibiotics maintain antibiotic resistance. Drug Discovery Today. 2000; 5: 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(00)01483-5
  6. Bruinsma N, Stobberingh E, Bogaard V. Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria from healthy volunteers in the Dutch community. Infection. 2003; 31: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-002-3035-8
  7. Son KT. Characteristics of antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacteria isolated from fish farms. Ph. D thesis, Pukyoung National University, Korea. 2006.
  8. Bogaard AE, London N, Stobberingh EE. Antimicrobial resistance in pig faecal samples from Netherlands and Sweden. J Antimicro Chemother. 2000; 45: 663-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/45.5.663
  9. Mellon N, Benbrook C, Benbrook K. Enterococcus faecium strains with van A-mediated high-level glycopeptide resistance isolated from animal foodstuffs and fecal samples of humans in the community. Microb Drug Resist. 1995; 1: 265-72. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.1995.1.265
  10. Willems RJ, Top J, Braak N, Belkum A, Endtz JD. Host specifity of vancomycin-resistance Enterococcus faecium. J Infect Dis. 2000; 182: 816-23. https://doi.org/10.1086/315752
  11. Wilks D, Farrington M, Rubenstein D. The Infectious disease Manual, 1st ed. Blackwell Science, 1995, 190-192.
  12. Richet HM, Mohammed J, McDonald LC, Jarvis WR. Building communication networks: International network for the study and prevention of emerging antimicrobial resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001; 322.
  13. Levy SB. Factors impacting on the problems of antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002; 49: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/49.1.25
  14. Randall, LP, Colles, SW, Osborn, MK, Piddock LJ, and Woodwar MJ. Antibiotic resistance genes, integrons and multiple antibiotic resistance gene in thirty-five serotypes on Salmonella enterica isolated from humans and animals in the UK. J Antimicrobol Chemother. 2004; 53: 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh070
  15. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Infectious diseases Laboratory Diagnosis, 2005.
  16. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Serotype of Salmonella spp. 2007.
  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, approved standard 8th ed, 2003, M2- A8.
  18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance Standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing, fifteenth informational supplement M100-S15.
  19. Kwang KW, Oh BY, Kim JH, Kim MH, Jegal S, Lee EJ, Lee EJ, Cho NK, Go JM, Kim YH. Antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance patterns of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from diarrhea patients in Incheon. K J Micro. 2009; 45: 99-104.
  20. Park SG, Kim MS, Lee YK. Trend of antimicrobial susceptibility and multiple drug resistance patterns of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from foodborne patients in Seoul between 2001 and 2005. J Fd Hyg Safety. 2006; 21: 23-30.
  21. Hernandez T, Rodriguez-Alvarez C, Arevalo MP, Tprres A, Sierra A, and Arias A. Antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar isolated from chicken in Spain. J Chemother. 2002; 14(4): 346-350. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2002.14.4.346
  22. Cailhol J, Lailer R, Bouver P, La Vielle S, Gauchard F, Saunder P, and Brisabois A. Trends in antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in non-typhoid Salmonella from human and poutry origins in France. Epidemiol Infect. 2005; 134: 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004863
  23. Erdem B, Ercis S, Hascelik G, Gur D, Gedikoglu S, Aysev AD, Sumerkan B, Tatman-Otkun M, Tuncer I. Antimicrobial resistance patterns and serotype distribution among Salmonella enterica strains in Turkey. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005; 24: 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-005-1293-y
  24. Murugkar HNV, Rahman H, Kumar A, and Bhattacharya D. Isolation, phage typing and antibiogram of Samonella from man and animals in northeastern India. Indian J Med Res. 2005; 122: 237-242.
  25. Park SG, Park SG, Jung JH, Jin YH. Trend of antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from diarrhea patients in Seoul. J Fd Hyg Safety. 2002; 17: 61-70.