DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Electromagnetic Interference of Wireless Local Area Network on Electrocardiogram Monitoring System: A Case Report

  • Chung, Seungmin (Division of Cardiology, Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yi, Joohee (Department of Information Strategy, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Seung Woo (Division of Cardiology, Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2013.03.30

Abstract

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) can affect various medical devices. Herein, we report the case of EMI from wireless local area network (WLAN) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring system. A patient who had a prior myocardial infarction participated in the cardiac rehabilitation program in the sports medicine center of our hospital under the wireless ECG monitoring system. After WLAN was installed, wireless ECG monitoring system failed to show a proper ECG signal. ECG signal was distorted when WLAN was turned on, but it was normalized after turning off the WLAN.

Keywords

References

  1. Gladman AS, Lapinsky SE. Wireless technology in the ICU: boon or ban? Crit Care 2007;11:165. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6112
  2. Lapinsky SE, Easty AC. Electromagnetic interference in critical care. J Crit Care 2006;21:267-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.03.010
  3. Klein AA, Djaiani GN. Mobile phones in the hospital--past, present and future. Anaesthesia 2003;58:353-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03079.x
  4. Tri JL, Severson RP, Firl AR, Hayes DL, Abenstein JP. Cellular telephone interference with medical equipment. Mayo Clin Proc 2005;80:1286-90. https://doi.org/10.4065/80.10.1286
  5. Hekmat K, Salemink B, Lauterbach G, et al. Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update. Europace 2004;6:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.010
  6. Fetter JG, Ivans V, Benditt DG, Collins J. Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:623-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00546-9
  7. Shaw CI, Kacmarek RM, Hampton RL, et al. Cellular phone interference with the operation of mechanical ventilators. Crit Care Med 2004;32:928-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000120061.01431.DB
  8. Baranchuk A, Kang J, Shaw C, et al. Electromagnetic interference of communication devices on ECG machines. Clin Cardiol 2009;32:588-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20459
  9. Kapa S, Pierce T, Hayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Asirvatham SJ. Electromagnetic interference of magnetic field based auto identification technologies in healthcare settings. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:239-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.001
  10. Garcia CU, Sigler FG, Duran MD, et al. On practical issues about interference in telecare applications based on different wireless technologies. Telemed J E Health 2007;13:519-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2007.0005