Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Villagers' Participation in Conservation of Village Woodlands -Two cases of Namwon City, Korea

마을숲 보전 사업에 대한 마을 주민의 참여가능성 -남원시 2개 마을의 경우

  • Park, So-Hee (Department of Forest Policy Research, Korea Rural Economic Institute) ;
  • Koo, Ja-Choon (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Youn, Yeo-Chang (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 박소희 (한국농촌경제연구원 산림정책연구부) ;
  • 구자춘 (서울대학교 산림과학부) ;
  • 윤여창 (서울대학교 산림과학부)
  • Published : 2013.03.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to analyze factors affecting villagers' participation in conservation of village woodlands. We postulated that socio-economic characteristics such as gender, age, place of birth, wealth level, frequency of use and leader experience could contribute to decision-making of participation in the village woodland conservation. Data were collected by interviewing 52 villagers in village A and 41 villagers in village B and were used to estimate the probability function of villager's participation in village woodland conservation using ordered logit model. The results indicate that frequent use of village woodlands increases the probability of villagers' participation in conservation of village woodlands in the case of village A. In the case of village B, people who were born in the village and have experiences of serving the village as a village leader are more likely to participate in the village woodland conservation activities. Considering the fact that the village woodland of village A is owned by the community as a village common, and that cultural activities remain in the village woodland of village A, the utility of village woodlands to the residents and their common understanding of village woodlands seem to influence the likelihood of villagers' participation in conservation of village woodlands. In order to induce villagers' participation in the village woodland conservation, it is necessary to recognize the right of villager's access and provide villagers with common understanding of village woodlands through cultural activities and education programs.

이 연구는 마을 주민이 마을숲 보전 사업에 참여할 가능성에 영향을 미치는 인자를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 성별, 연령, 출신지, 부의 수준, 마을숲 이용 빈도, 마을조직 대표 경험과 같은 주민들의 사회경제적 특성이 마을숲 보전 사업 참여가능성에 영향을 줄 것이라고 예상하였다. 설문조사를 통해 마을숲이 존재하는 두 마을에서 각각 52명, 41명의 응답을 얻을 수 있었으며, 순서화 로짓 모형을 이용하여 수집된 자료를 분석하였다. A마을에서는 마을숲 이용 빈도가 높은 사람일수록 마을숲 보전 사업 참여가능성이 높게 나타났으며, B마을에서는 그 마을에서 태어나고 마을조직 대표 경험이 있는 사람일수록 마을숲 보전 사업 참여가능성이 높게 나타났다. 주민들의 마을숲 보전 사업 참여가능성에 영향을 미치는 요인이 마을별로 다르게 나타난 이유는 마을숲 소유권으로 인한 마을 주민들의 마을숲 이용 현황과 마을숲 문화의 유무에 따라 마을숲 가치를 이해하고 있는 주민의 비율이 서로 달랐기 때문으로 판단된다. 따라서 마을숲 보전 사업에 주민들의 참여를 유도하기 위해서는 마을숲의 이용권한을 지역 주민들에게 부여하고, 마을숲을 활용한 문화행사나 교육사업 등을 통하여 마을숲에 대한 주민들의 이해도를 높이는 것이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영태. 2002. 해안 방풍림을 찾아: 완도 갈문마을. 무등일보. http://www.moodeungilbo.co.kr/searchview.php3?no=82777&read_temp=20021213§ion=17(2012.3.5).
  2. 김인애. 2005. 마을숲 소실에 영향을 미치는 요인. 서울 대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  3. 김재성. 2008. 강원도 춘천, 홍천, 강릉지역의 마을숲 현 황과 관리방안. 강원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  4. 김태수. 2009. 직장에서 리더에게 요구되는 리더십에 대 한 연구. 유관순 연구 14: 161-181.
  5. 김학범, 장동수. 1994. 마을숲: 한국 전통부락의 당숲과 수구막이. 열화당. 서울. pp. 204.
  6. 김호정, 김종학. 2007. 순서화 로짓 모형(Ordered Logit Model): 설문조사에 적용되는 척도의 종류. 국토: 94-102.
  7. 박미호. 2007. 전통마을숲의 보전 방향: 법제도적 측면 을 중심으로. 생명의숲국민운동 주최 제3차 전통마을숲 포럼 자료집.
  8. 박봉우. 2006. 마을숲과 문화. 한국학논집 33: 195-231.
  9. 생명의숲국민운동. 2007. (역주)조선의 임수. 지오북. 서울. pp. 999.
  10. 윤도현. 2007. 시민의 손으로 마을 소나무숲 지켜내다. 생명의숲국민운동 주최 제5차 마을숲 포럼 발표자료.
  11. 이성우. 2005. 로짓.프라빗 모형 응용. 박영사. 서울. pp. 486.
  12. Allison, P.D., 1999. Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Sociological Methods & Research 28, 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124199028002003
  13. Atmis, E., Gunsen, H.B., Lise, B.B. and Lise, W. 2009. Factors affecting forest cooperative's participation in forestry in Turkey. Forest Policy and Economics 11(2): 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.002
  14. Chhatre, A. and Agrawal, A. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(42): 17667-17670. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905308106
  15. Chopra, K., Kadekodi, G.K. and Murthy, M.N. 1990. Participatory Development, People and Common Property Resources. Sage. NewDelhi. pp. 168.
  16. Coulibaly-Lingani, P., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M. and Oden, P. 2011. Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Forest Policy and Economics 13(4): 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.005
  17. Dolisca, F., Carter, D.R., McDaniel, J.M., Shannon, D.A. and Jolly, C.M. 2006. Factors influencing farmers' participation in forestry management programs: A case study from Haiti. Forest Ecology and Management 236(2-3): 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.017
  18. Gurland, J., Lee, I. and Dahm, P.A. 1960. Polychotomous Quantal Response in Biological Assay. Biometrics 16(3): 382-398. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527689
  19. Guthiga, P.M. 2008. Understanding Local Communities' Perceptions of Existing Forest Management Regimes of a Kenyan Rainforest. International Journal of Social Forestry 1(2): 145-167.
  20. Heinen, J.T. 1996. Human Behavior, Incentives, and Protected Area Management. Conservation Biology 10(2): 681-684. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020681.x
  21. Jensen, K., Jakus, P.M., English, B. and Menard, J. 2003. Market Participation and Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Certified Products. Forest Science 49(4): 632-641.
  22. Koo, J.C., Youn, Y.C. and Jo, J.H. 2010. The main causes of village grove loss in Korea and their relative importance. 13th IUFRO World Congress Forests for the future. Seoul.
  23. Nagubadi, V., McNamara, K.T., Hoover, W.L. and Mills, W.L. 1996. Program participation behavior of nonindustrial forest landowners: a probit analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28: 323-336.
  24. Nepal, S.K. and Weber, K.E. 1995. Prospects for Coexistence: Wildlife and Local People. Ambio 24(4): 238-245.
  25. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal 18(9): 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
  26. Ostrom, E. 1999. Self-Governance and Forest Resources. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 20.
  27. Persha, L., Agrawal, A. and Chhatre, A. 2011. Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation. Science 331(6024): 1606-1608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199343
  28. Portes, A. 1971. Political Primitivism, Differential Socialization, and Lower-Class Leftist Radicalism. American Sociological Review 36(5): 820-835. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093669
  29. Shin, D.H. 2009. The fate of the commons and sustainable ancient wisdom of Korea. Journal of the International Association of Comparative Korean Studies 17: 7-31.
  30. Youn, Y.C., Koo, J.C., Yun, J.O. and Kweon, D.K. 2011. Role of Ownership and access right in conservation of village groves: The case of municipalities around the Jirisan Mountains, Korea. The 96th ESA Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas.

Cited by

  1. Relevance of cultural ecosystem services in nurturing ecological identity values that support restoration and conservation efforts vol.505, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119920