시판되는 구강 양치액과 알칼리 이온수가 구강 내 세균에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Commercially Available Mouth Rinsing Solution and Alkaline Ionized Water on the Oral Bacteria

  • 박선녀 (을지대학교 보건대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 정순정 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강조직발생학교실) ;
  • 정문진 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강조직발생학교실) ;
  • 안용순 (을지대학교 보건대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 최유석 (을지대학교 보건대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 임도선 (을지대학교 보건대학원 치위생학과)
  • Park, Seon-Nyeo (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Jeong, Soon-Jeong (Department of Oral Histology and Developmental Biology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeong, Moon-Jin (Department of Oral Histology and Developmental Biology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Soon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Choi, Yoo-Seok (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Lim, Do-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University)
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

구취감소와 구강청결의 목적으로 사용되는 구강 양치액과 음용수로 사용되고 있는 알칼리 이온수를 대상자 49명에게 적용하여, 사용 전 후 구강 내 상주하는 세균에 미치는 영향을 비교 평가를 위해 세균배양 및 광학현미경 관찰을 통해 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 배양 후 확인된 구강 양치액 사용 전 후 세균 수는 Hexamedin 71.29%로 가장 큰 감소율을 보였고, 이어 Listerine 62.25%, Caregargle 42.26%, Garglin 33.52%, saline 21.62%, alkaline ionized water 16.08%, distilled water 7.67%의 순으로 나타났다. 2. Wilcoxon's signed rank 검정 결과, Hexamedin에서 사용 후 세균 수의 감소가 유의하게 나타났고(p<0.05), 그 외 구강 양치액에서는 통계적인 차이는 보이지 않았다(p>0.05). 3. 그람염색 후 광학현미경 관찰 결과, 구강 양치액 및 알칼리 이온수 사용 전에는 다수의 구균과 일부 실사균이 관찰되었으나, 사용 후에는 대부분 구균이 관찰되었고, 실사균은 거의 관찰되지 않았다. 4. 구강 양치액 및 알칼리 이온수의 pH 차이는 구강 내 세균 수 변화에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 본 결과를 종합하면, Hexamedine과 Listerine의 구강 내 세균 감소율이 각각 71.29%, 62.25%로 나타나 치과치료 전 적용 시 효과가 높음이 입증되었다. 그 외 구강 양치액과 알칼리 이온수는 구강 내 세균 감소효과가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 세균 감소는 pH 보다는 구강 양치액에 포함된 항균 물질의 성분이 영향을 주는 것으로 생각된다.

The mouth rinsing solution currently on the market is used for oral hygiene and reduction of halitosis, and alkaline ionized water is used for drinking purposes. The aim of this germiculture and observation through a microscope is to investigate the effect they have on the oral bacteria, and the results are as follows. 1. The change in the number of cultivated bacteria before and after the use of gargle was most dramatic for Hexamedin. It showed the highest rate of decrease in bacteria by 71.29%, followed by Listerine with 62.25%, Caregargle with 42.26%, Garglin with 33.52%, saline solution with 21.62%, alkaline ionized water with 16.08% and distilled water with 7.67%. 2. After careful analysis of statistics, Hexamedin was found to result in a significant decrease in the number of bacteria after gargling (p<0.05). 3. From observing through an light microscope after gram staining, it was evident that both a number of cocci and a few of filamentous were present before the use of gargle, whereas mostly cocci was present after the use of gargle. 4. The difference in the pH of oral rinses and alkaline ionized water had no significant influence on the number of oral bacteria. In conclusion, Hexamedin and Listerine, with the rate of decrease of bacteria of co71.29% and 62.25% respectively, have proven to be highly effective when applied before dental treatment. Other oral rinses and alkaline ionized water are relatively less efficient in decreasing the number of oral bacteria. Also, the decrease of bacteria is more affected by the antibacterial component of oral rinses than by the change in pH.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae KH, Lee BJ, Jang YK, et al.: The effect of mouthrinse products containing sodium fluoride, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), pine leaf extracts and green tea extracts on the plaque, gingivitis, dental caries and halitosis. J Korean Acad Dent Health 25: 51-57, 2001.
  2. Harris NO, Garcia GF: Dentifrices, mouthrinses and chewing gums, Pearson Prentice Hall, Primary Preventive Dentistry, New Jersey, pp.132-136, 2004.
  3. Eley BM: Antibacterial agents in the control of supragingival plaque: a review. Br dent J 186: 286-296, 1999.
  4. Gjermo P, Rolla G, Arskang L: Effect on dental plaque formation and some in vitro properties of 12 bisbiguanides. J Periodontal Res 8: 81-88, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1973.tb02169.x
  5. Loesche WJ, Kazor C: Microbiology and treatment of halitosis. Periodontol 2000 28: 256-279, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280111.x
  6. Barnett ML: The role of therapeutic antimicrobial mouthrinses in clinical practice: control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis. J Am Dent Assoc 134: 699-704, 2003. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0255
  7. Ryoo KK, Kang BD, Sumita O: Electrolyzed water as an alternative for environmentally benign semiconductor cleaning. J Mater Res 17: 1298-1304, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.0194
  8. Kwon NH, Kim SH, Kim JY, et al.: Antimicrobial activity of GC-100X against major food-borne pathogens and detaching effects of it against Escherichia coli O157: H7 on the surface of tomatoes. J Food Hyg Saf 17: 436-444, 2002.
  9. Kim YG, Kim TW, Ding Tian, Oh DH: Improve the quality of lettuce using electrolyzed water and citric acid and microbial reduction effect. Korean J Food Sci Technol 41: 578-586, 2009.
  10. Kim YM, Choi YS, Cho IH: Cleansing effect of the alkaline ionized water on microorganisms of the denture surface. J Korean Acad Prosthodont Soc 49: 138-144, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.2.138
  11. Baehni PC, Takeeuchi Y: Anti-plaque agents in the prevention of biofilm-assoclated oral disease. Oral Dis 9: 23-29, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.9.s1.5.x
  12. Jon W, Nivedita R, Roger G, et al.: Antibacterial and antiplaque effects of a novel, alcohol free oral rinse with cetylpyridinium chloride. J Cont Dental Pract 6: 1-9, 2005.
  13. Christine H, Naresh C, Jack W: Comparative efficacy of an antiseptic mouthrise and an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice. J Am Dent Assoc 132: 670-675, 2001. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0245
  14. Mustafa MK, Suat O, Sibel K, Ozgur T, Hulya E: Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 3: 57-61, 2009.
  15. Davies RM, Jensen SB, Schiott CR, Loe H: The effect of topical application of chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization of the teeth and gingiva. J Periodontal Res 5: 96-101, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1970.tb00699.x
  16. Pitte G, Pianotti R: The in vivo effects of an antiseptic mouthwash on order-producting microorganism. J Dent Res 60: 1891-1896, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600111101
  17. Fine DH, Furgang D, Korik I, et al.: Reduction of viable bacteria in dental aerosols by preprocedural rinsing with an antiseptic mouthrinse. Am J Dent 6: 219-221, 1993.
  18. Kim HS, Gang SM, Gwon HG: Xanthorrhizol of surfactant added antibacterial effect. J Korean Acad Oral Health 35: 41-48, 2011.
  19. Seo EJ: Effect of mouthrinse containing lipomyces starkeyi KSM 22 glucanhydrolase on plaque formation during a 4-day period. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam University, Daejeon, 2003.
  20. O HS: The influence of auxiliary goods for the reduction of oral malodor. Unpublished master's thesis, Gachon University, Incheon, 2006.
  21. Kim DJ, Yu KH, Lim HS, Lee SK, Kim SG, Kim HK: Effect of saline irrigation used in combination with antimicrobial agents on salivary bacterial. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 36: 202-205, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.3.202
  22. Park HL, Kim YK, Ryoo KK, Lee YB, Lee JK: Studies on the antibacterial effects of electrolyzed reduced water. J Korean Acad Industrial Soc 6: 215-221, 2005.
  23. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O: Clinical cariology: caries chemistry and fluoride-mechanisms of action, diet and the caries process. 2nd ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp.231-257, 288- 299, 1994.
  24. Gregory-Head G, Curtis D: Erosion caused by gastroesophageal reflux: diagnostic considerations. J Prothodont 6: 278-285, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1997.tb00108.x