도재 소성 과정에서의 고온이 지르코니아 코어의 변연적합도에 미치는 영향

Influence of High Temperature of the Porcelain Firing Process on the Marginal Fit of Zirconia Core

  • 김재홍 (고려대학교 일반대학원 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김기백 (고려대학교 일반대학원 치의기공전공)
  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

본 연구는 치과에서 사용되는 심미 보철물 중에 하나인 지르코니아 기반의 전부도재관 제작 시 지르코니아 코어 위에 상부 도재를 축성하고 소성하는 과정에서 발생되는 고온이 완성된 전부도재관의 변연적합도에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써 임상적 허용이 가능한지 알아볼 뿐 아니라, 치과보철치료를 위한 치과의사, 치과위생사, 치과기공사의 보철물 선택 시 임상적 참고자료로 제공할 목적으로 수행되었다. 심미에 가장 많은 영향을 미치는 상악 중절치를 지대치로 선정하여 동일한 모형 10개 제작 후 각각의 지대치에 적합한 지르코니아 코어를 제작하였다. 제작된 코어의 변연적합도 측정 후 코어 위에 상부 도재를 축성하여 전부도재관을 완성한 뒤 2차 측정을 실시하였으며, 측정 후 비교 분석 된 결과는 다음과 같다. 변연적합도는 지르코니아 코어 제작한 후 전부도재관으로 제작되는 과정에 따라 더 커졌으며, 통계적으로도 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.001). 그러나 전부도재관에서 총 80회 측정된 변연적합도의 값에서 임상적 허용 수치인 $120{\mu}m$을 넘지 않는 결과를 보였으며, 이와 같은 결과를 토대로 지르코니아 코어 위에 상부 도재 소성 시 변연적합도가 커지긴하나 임상적으로 허용이 가능하다는 결론을 도출하였다.

One factor for successful prognosis of finished dental prosthesis is good marginal fit. The purpose of this study in vitro investigation was to compare the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown before and after porcelain veneering, to evaluate the influence of high temperature of the porcelain firing on the fit. For this experiment, model of abutment tooth of maxillary right central incisor was prepared. Ten working models were produced. Ten zirconia cores were made by dental computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing system. The marginal fit of specimens were examined using silicone replica technique. Silicone replicas were sectioned four times and were measured through a digital microscope (${\times}160$). Marginal fit is a distance connected between edge end part of specimen and abutment margin. Each specimens was measured twice, the first measurement was done prior to veneering porcelain firing, while the second measurement was done after the porcelain firing to evaluate this process. Statistical analyses were performed with paired t-test. $Mean{\pm}SD$ marginal fit was $60.8{\pm}14.2{\mu}m$ for zirconia core and $86.1{\pm}13.3{\mu}m$ for all-ceramic crown. They were statistically significant differences (p<0.001). But all specimens showed a marginal fit where the gap widths ranged within the clinical recommendation ($120{\mu}m$), all-ceramic crown production using the zirconia core was adequate.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Conrad HJ, Seoung WJ, Pesun IJ: Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98: 389-404, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  2. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J: Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, p.774, 2006.
  3. Denry I, Kelly JR: State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 24: 299-307, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  4. Kim KB, Lee GT, Kim HY, Kim JH: The influence of different gypsum materials on the accuracy from complete arch digital impression. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 617-623, 2012.
  5. Luthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, et al.: Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 81: 487-491, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100711
  6. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR: The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 40: 17-21, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
  7. Faucher RR, Nicholls JI: Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 43: 149-155, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90178-X
  8. Dederich DN, Svare CW, Peterson LC, Turner KA: The effect of repeated firings on the margins of nonprecious ceramometals. J Prosthet Dent 51: 628-630, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90406-2
  9. Hamaguchi H, Cacciatore A, Tueller VM: Marginal distortion of the porcelain bonded-to-metal complete crown: an SEM study. J Prosthet Dent 47: 146-153, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90178-0
  10. Bridger DV, Nicholls JI: Distortion of ceramometal fixed partial dentures during the firing cycle. J Prosthet Dent 45: 507-514, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90036-6
  11. Buchanan WT, Svare CW, Turner KA: The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 45: 502-506, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90035-4
  12. Komine F, Shiratsuchi H, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H: Influence of porcelain-firing procedures on the marginal distortion of electroformed metal-ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 38: E583-E588, 2007.
  13. Sarver DM: The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120: 98-111, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114301
  14. Han MS, Kim KB: Comparison of the marginal and internal fit on the cast and CAD-CAM cores. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 368-374, 2012.
  15. Kim JH, Kim KB: An evaluation validity of the silicone replica technique at measurement on fit of fixed dental prostheses. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 566-571, 2012.
  16. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P: Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113: 174-179, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  17. Vigolo P, Fonzi F: An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. J Prosthodont 17: 621-626, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00366.x
  18. McLean JW, von Frauenhofer JA: The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131: 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  19. Ostlund LE: Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent 10: 122-137, 1985.
  20. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jamelson L, Wozniak W: A comparison of the marginal fit of in-ceram, IPS empress, and procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10: 478-484, 1997.
  21. Gulker I: Margins. NY State Dent J 51: 213-217, 1985.
  22. Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Quaas S, Bornemann G, Luthardt RG: Internal and external fit of CAM-made zirconia bridge frameworks-a pilot study. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 61: 38-42, 2006.