공업화학 (Applied Chemistry for Engineering)

  • 제24권3호
  • /
  • Pages.299-304
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-0112(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4505(eISSN)
한국공업화학회 (The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry)
권호 표지

반응 표면 분석법을 이용한 일체형 흡착제의 합성 조건 최적화

Optimization of Synthesis Condition of Monolithic Sorbent Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Park, Ha Eun (Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Row, Kyung Ho (Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University)
  • 발행 : 2013.06.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Box-Behnken design (BBD) 방법은 일체형 흡착제의 합성조건을 최적화하기 위해 사용되었다. 단량체(monomer)의 양(mL), 가교제(crosslink)의 양(mL), porogen의 양(mL)에 대한 효과를 조사했다. 실험 값은 여러 회귀분석 및 통계적인 방법에 의해 2차 다항 방정식을 얻었다. 이 모델의 결정계수($R^2$)는 0.9915이고 결정계수의 p value는 0.0001보다 작은 값으로 모델이 매우 유의미하다는 것을 나타낸다. RSM 모델에 의해 예측된 최적의 일체형 흡착제 합성조건은 단량체의 양 0.30 mL, 가교제의 양 1.40 mL, porogen의 양 1.47 mL이고 이 조건 아래서 합성된 일체형 흡착제의 양은 2120.15 mg이다. 이 결과는 이 모델이 적절하다는 것을 나타내었다.

A 17-run Box-Behnken design was used to optimize the synthesis conditions of a monolithic sorbent. The effects of the amount of monomer (mL), crosslink (mL) and porogen (mL) were investigated. The experimental data were fitted to a second-order polynomial equation by the multiple regression analysis and examined using statistical methods. The adjusted coefficient of determination ($R^2$) of the model was 0.9915. The probability value (p < 0.0001) demonstrated a high significance for the regression model. A mean amount of polymer as 2120.15 mg was produced under the following optimum synthesis conditions: the optimized volumes of monomer, crosslink and porogen are 0.30, 1.40, and 1.47 mL, respectively. This was in good agreement with the predicted model value.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Hashem and T. Jira, Chromatographia, 61, 133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0479-2
  2. A. Korner and S. Kohn, J. Chromatogr. A, 1089, 148 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.06.084
  3. I. Mihelic, D. Nemec, A. Podgornik, and T. Koloini, J. Chromatogr. A, 1065, 59 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.054
  4. T. Zhu and K. H. Row, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Related Technol., 32, 1423 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10826070902900954
  5. T. Zhu and K. H. Row, Chromatographia, 71, 981 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1574-1
  6. N. Fontanals, R. M. Marce, and F. Borrull, J. Chromatogr. A, 1152, 14 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.077
  7. M. Guerrouache, B. Carbonnier, C. Vidal-Madjar, and M. C. Millot, J. Chromatogr. A, 1149, 368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.039
  8. Q. Luo, H. Zou, X. Xiao, Z. Guo, L. Kong, and X. Mao, J. Chromatogr. A, 926, 255 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01055-X
  9. N. Tanaka, H. Kobayashi, and N. Ishizuka, J. Chromatogr. A, 965, 35 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01582-5
  10. E. G. Vlakh and T. B. Tennikova, J. Sep. Sci., 30, 2801 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700284
  11. G. E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson, J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 13, 1 (1951).
  12. Y. Sun, T. Li, J. Yan, and J. Liu, Carbohydr. Polym., 80, 242 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.018
  13. J. Guo, Y. Luo, D. Fan, P. Gao, X. Ma, and C. Zhu, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 18, 830 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60135-X
  14. Y. Wu, S. W. Cui, J. Tang, and X. Gu, Food Chem., 105, 1599 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.066
  15. G. Yin and Y. Dang, Carbohydr. Polym., 74, 603 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.025
  16. C. Zhang, D. Fan, L. Shang, X. Ma, Y. Luo, W. Xue, and P. Gao, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 18, 137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60334-1
  17. T. Zhu, H. J. Heo, and K. H. Row, Carbohydr. Polym., 82, 106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.029
  18. G. E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson, J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 13, 1 (1951).
  19. S. L. C. Ferreira, R. E. Bruns, H. S. Ferreira, G. D. Matos, J. M. David, and G. C. Brand, Anal. Chim. Acta., 597, 179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011
  20. H. Zhao, J. Wang, and Z. Lu, Carbohydr. Polym., 77, 677 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.013
  21. H. Xu, L. P. Sun, Y. Z. Shi, Y. H. Wu, B. Zhang, and D. Q. Zhao, Biochem. Eng. J., 39, 66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.013
  22. R. Li, W. Chen, W. Wang, W. Tian, and X. Zhang, Carbohydr. Polym., 78, 784 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.06.018
  23. W. Y. Song and S. W. Chang, J. Kor. Soc. Wat. Qual., 25, 96 (2009).