DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Imaging Characteristics of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on CT and FDG-PET: Relationship with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Protein Expression Status and Survival

  • Lee, Youkyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Ju (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young Tae (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Xenotransplantation Research Center, Clinical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Chang Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Xenotransplantation Research Center, Clinical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Goo, Jin Mo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Chang Min (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Paeng, Jin Chul (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Doo Hyun (Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Jeon, Yoon Kyung (Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Published : 2013.04.01

Abstract

Objective: To identify CT and FDG-PET features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein overexpression, and to evaluate whether imaging features and EGFR-overexpression can help predict clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: In 214 patients (M : F = 129 : 85; mean age, 63.2) who underwent curative resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR protein expression status was determined through immunohistochemical analysis. Imaging characteristics on CT and FDG-PET was assessed in relation to EGFR-overexpression. Imaging features and EGFR-overexpression were also evaluated for clinical outcome by using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: EGFR-overexpression was found in 51 patients (23.8%). It was significantly more frequent in tumors with an $SUV_{max}$ > 5.0 (p < 0.0001), diameter > 2.43 cm (p < 0.0001), and with ground glass opacity ${\leq}$ 50% (p = 0.0073). $SUV_{max}$ > 5.0 (OR, 3.113; 95% CI, 1.375-7.049; p = 0.006) and diameter > 2.43 cm (OR, 2.799; 95% CI, 1.285-6.095; p = 0.010) were independent predictors of EGFR overexpression. Multivariate analysis showed that $SUV_{max}$ > 4.0 (hazard ratio, 10.660; 95% CI, 1.370-82.966; p = 0.024), and the presence of cavitation within a tumor (hazard ratio, 3.122; 95% CI, 1.143-8.532; p = 0.026) were factors associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: EGFR-overexpression is associated with high $SUV_{max}$, large tumor diameter, and small GGO proportion. CT and FDG-PET findings, which are closely related to EGFR overexpression, can be valuable in the prediction of clinical outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. Schiller, JH, Harrington, D, Belani, CP, Langer, C, Sandler, A, Krook, J,Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, N Engl J Med, 346, 1, 92-98(2002) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011954
  2. Cappuzzo, F, Gregorc, V, Rossi, E, Cancellieri, A, Magrini, E, Paties, CT,Gefitinib in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analysis of efficacy and correlation with HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, J Clin Oncol, 21, 2, 2658-2663(2003) https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.01.039
  3. Huang, SM, Harari, PM,Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in cancer therapy: biology, rationale and preliminary clinical results, Invest New Drugs, 17, 3, 259-269(1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006384521198
  4. Nicholson, RI, Gee, JM, Harper, ME,EGFR and cancer prognosis, Eur J Cancer, 37, 4, S9-S15(2001)
  5. Ohsaki, Y, Tanno, S, Fujita, Y, Toyoshima, E, Fujiuchi, S, Nishigaki, Y,Epidermal growth factor receptor expression correlates with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with p53 overexpression, Oncol Rep, 7, 5, 603-607(2000)
  6. Volm, M, Rittgen, W, Drings, P,Prognostic value of ERBB-1, VEGF, cyclin A, FOS, JUN and MYC in patients with squamous cell lung carcinomas, Br J Cancer, 77, 6, 663-669(1998) https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.106
  7. Goldstraw, P, Crowley, J, Chansky, K, Giroux, DJ, Groome, PA, Rami-Porta, R,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours, J Thorac Oncol, 2, 7, 706-714(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812f3c1a
  8. Rusch, VW, Crowley, J, Giroux, DJ, Goldstraw, P, Im, JG, Tsuboi, M,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 2, 8, 603-612(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31807ec803
  9. Postmus, PE, Brambilla, E, Chansky, K, Crowley, J, Goldstraw, P, Patz, EF,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 2, 9, 686-693(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31811f4703
  10. Travis, WD, Brambilla, E, Noguchi, M, Nicholson, AG, Geisinger, KR, Yatabe, Y,International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma, J Thorac Oncol, 6, 10, 244-285(2011) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221
  11. Lee, HJ, Goo, JM, Lee, CH, Park, CM, Kim, KG, Park, EA,Predictive CT findings of malignancy in ground-glass nodules on thin-section chest CT: the effects on radiologist performance, Eur Radiol, 19, 11, 552-560(2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1188-2
  12. Park, EA, Lee, HJ, Kim, YT, Kang, CH, Kang, KW, Jeon, YK,EGFR gene copy number in adenocarcinoma of the lung by FISH analysis: investigation of significantly related factors on CT, FDG-PET, and histopathology, Lung Cancer, 64, 12, 179-186(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.003
  13. Jeon, YK, Sung, SW, Chung, JH, Park, WS, Seo, JW, Kim, CW,Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number and protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer, Lung Cancer, 54, 13, 387-398(2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.015
  14. Rami-Porta, R, Ball, D, Crowley, J, Giroux, DJ, Jett, J, Travis, WD,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer, J Thorac Oncol, 2, 14, 593-602(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31807a2f81
  15. Groome, PA, Bolejack, V, Crowley, JJ, Kennedy, C, Krasnik, M, Sobin, LH,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours, J Thorac Oncol, 2, 15, 694-705(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812d05d5
  16. Yano, T, Morodomi, Y, Ito, K, Yoshida, T, Haro, A, Shoji, F,Verification of the newly proposed T category (seventh edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis classification) from a clinicopathological viewpoint in non-small cell lung cancer-special reference to tumor size, J Thorac Oncol, 5, 16, 45-48(2010) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c0996c
  17. Lee, KW, Im, JG, Kim, TJ, Dae, CM,A new method of measuring the amount of soft tissue in pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: a phantom study, Korean J Radiol, 9, 17, 219-225(2008) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.3.219
  18. van Klaveren, RJ, Oudkerk, M, Prokop, M, Scholten, ET, Nackaerts, K, Vernhout, R,Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning, N Engl J Med, 361, 18, 2221-2229(2009) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0906085
  19. Sasaki, R, Komaki, R, Macapinlac, H, Erasmus, J, Allen, P, Forster, K,[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol, 23, 19, 1136-1143(2005) https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.06.129
  20. Shin, KM, Lee, KS, Shim, YM, Kim, J, Kim, BT, Kwon, OJ,FDG PET/CT and mediastinal nodal metastasis detection in stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic implications, Korean J Radiol, 9, 20, 481-489(2008) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.6.481
  21. Taylor, MD, Smith, PW, Brix, WK, Wick, MR, Theodosakis, N, Swenson, BR,Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and tumor marker expression in non-small cell lung cancer, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 137, 21, 43-48(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.014
  22. Giroux, DJ, Rami-Porta, R, Chansky, K, Crowley, JJ, Groome, PA, Postmus, PE,The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: data elements for the prospective project, J Thorac Oncol, 4, 22, 679-683(2009) https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a52370
  23. Yano, M, Sasaki, H, Kobayashi, Y, Yukiue, H, Haneda, H, Suzuki, E,Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation and computed tomographic findings in peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma, J Thorac Oncol, 1, 23, 413-416(2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1556-0864(15)31604-X
  24. Onn, A, Choe, DH, Herbst, RS, Correa, AM, Munden, RF, Truong, MT,Tumor cavitation in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: epidermal growth factor receptor expression and prediction of poor outcome, Radiology, 237, 24, 342-347(2005) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041650
  25. Onn, A, Correa, AM, Gilcrease, M, Isobe, T, Massarelli, E, Bucana, CD,Synchronous overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu protein is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 10, 25, 136-143(2004) https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0373-3
  26. Franklin, WA, Veve, R, Hirsch, FR, Helfrich, BA, Bunn, PA,Epidermal growth factor receptor family in lung cancer and premalignancy, Semin Oncol, 29, 26, 3-14(2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-7754(02)70226-1
  27. Suzuki, K, Kusumoto, M, Watanabe, S, Tsuchiya, R, Asamura, H,Radiologic classification of small adenocarcinoma of the lung: radiologic-pathologic correlation and its prognostic impact, Ann Thorac Surg, 81, 27, 413-419(2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.058
  28. Takashima, S, Maruyama, Y, Hasegawa, M, Yamanda, T, Honda, T, Kadoya, M,Prognostic significance of high-resolution CT findings in small peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study on 64 patients, Lung Cancer, 36, 28, 289-295(2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00489-5
  29. Vazquez, M, Carter, D, Brambilla, E, Gazdar, A, Noguchi, M, Travis, WD,Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications, Lung Cancer, 64, 29, 148-154(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.009
  30. Chaudhuri, MR,Primary pulmonary cavitating carcinomas, Thorax, 28, 30, 354-366(1973) https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.28.3.354
  31. Berger, M, Thompson, JR,Cavitary carcinomatosis of the lungs. Report of a case, Dis Chest, 52, 31, 106-111(1967) https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.52.1.106
  32. Kolodziejski, LS, Dyczek, S, Duda, K, Goralczyk, J, Wysocki, WM, Lobaziewicz, W,Cavitated tumor as a clinical subentity in squamous cell lung cancer patients, Neoplasma, 50, 32, 66-73(2003)
  33. Pentheroudakis, G, Kostadima, L, Fountzilas, G, Kalogera-Fountzila, A, Klouvas, G, Kalofonos, C,Cavitating squamous cell lung carcinoma-distinct entity or not? Analysis of radiologic, histologic, and clinical features, Lung Cancer, 45, 33, 349-355(2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.02.013

Cited by

  1. Tumor Vascularity and Glucose Metabolism Correlated in Adenocarcinoma, but Not in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung vol.9, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091649
  2. Metabolic Phenotype of Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma: Relationship With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation vol.40, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000000684
  3. Impact of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification of stage IA adenocarcinoma of the lung: Correlation between c vol.9, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2422
  4. Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung cancer:Proposal for a scoring model using imaging and demographic characteristics vol.26, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4252-3
  5. CT Features Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma vol.280, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016151455
  6. Prognostic Value of Semiautomatic CT Volumetry in Patients With Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vol.40, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000368
  7. Radiomic Features Are Associated With EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinomas vol.17, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.02.001
  8. Preclinical evaluation of 5-([11C]-methyloxy)-L-tryptophan as a potential PET molecular imaging probe vol.37, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000000583
  9. Associations Between Somatic Mutations and Metabolic Imaging Phenotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer vol.58, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.181826
  10. Radiological and Clinical Features associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status of Exon 19 and 21 in Lung Adenocarcinoma vol.7, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00511-2
  11. CT characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.17, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0175-3
  12. Associations between clinical data and computed tomography features in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung adenocarcinoma vol.23, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1197-8
  13. Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller vol.214, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.21811
  14. Value of CT features for predicting EGFR mutations and ALK positivity in patients with lung adenocarcinoma vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83646-7