DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer: Optimal B Value at 3T

  • Koo, Ji Hyun (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chan Kyo (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Dongil (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Byung Kwan (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Ghee Young (Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Bohyun (Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2013.02.01

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively determine the optimal b value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting the presence of localized prostate cancer, and to evaluate the utility of DWI under different b values in differentiating between cancers and benign prostatic tissues. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients with suspected prostate cancer underwent MRI including DWI at 3T, followed by radical prostatectomy. DWI was examined under different b values. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated by using b = 0, and other b values of 300, 700, 1000 or 2000 $s/mm^2$. For predicting the presence of cancers, four different ADC maps were analyzed independently by two blinded readers. ADCs were measured in benign and malignant tissues. Results: For predicting the presence of 110 prostate cancers, the sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) for an experienced reader was significantly greater at b = 1000 (85% and 0.91) than b = 300, 700 or 2000 $s/mm^2$ (p < 0.01). For a less-experienced reader, the AUC was significantly greater at b = 700, 1000 or 2000 than b = 300 $s/mm^2$ (p < 0.01). Mean ADCs of the cancers in sequence from b = 300 to 2000 $s/mm^2$ were 1.33, 1.03, 0.88 and $0.68{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$, which were significantly lower than those of benign tissues (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The optimal b value for 3T DWI for predicting the presence of prostate cancer may be 1000 $s/mm^2$.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, CK, Park, BK, Kim, B,Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 194, 1, 1461-1469(2010) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3654
  2. Yakar, D, Hambrock, T, Huisman, H, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, CA, van Lin, E, Vergunst, H,Feasibility of 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy, Invest Radiol, 45, 2, 121-125(2010) https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c7bcda
  3. Turkbey, B, Shah, VP, Pang, Y, Bernardo, M, Xu, S, Kruecker, J,Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?, Radiology, 258, 3, 488-495(2011) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100667
  4. Kim, CK, Park, BK, Kim, B,High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 194, 4, W33-W37(2010) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3004
  5. Katahira, K, Takahara, T, Kwee, TC, Oda, S, Suzuki, Y, Morishita, S,Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation, Eur Radiol, 21, 5, 188-196(2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1883-7
  6. Pickles, MD, Gibbs, P, Sreenivas, M, Turnbull, LW,Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T, J Magn Reson Imaging, 23, 6, 130-134(2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20477
  7. Haider, MA, van der Kwast, TH, Tanguay, J, Evans, AJ, Hashmi, AT, Lockwood, G,Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 189, 7, 323-328(2007) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2211
  8. deSouza, NM, Riches, SF, Vanas, NJ, Morgan, VA, Ashley, SA, Fisher, C,Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer, Clin Radiol, 63, 8, 774-782(2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.001
  9. Kim, CK, Park, BK, Lee, HM, Kwon, GY,Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results, Invest Radiol, 42, 9, 842-847(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181461d21
  10. Jager, GJ, Ruijter, ET, van de Kaa, CA, de la Rosette, JJ, Oosterhof, GO, Thornbury, JR,Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results, Radiology, 203, 10, 645-652(1997) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169683
  11. Oto, A, Kayhan, A, Jiang, Y, Tretiakova, M, Yang, C, Antic, T,Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, Radiology, 257, 11, 715-723(2010) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100021
  12. Heo, SH, Jeong, YY, Shin, SS, Kim, JW, Lim, HS, Lee, JH,Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with the histologic differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, Korean J Radiol, 11, 12, 295-303(2010) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.295
  13. Moon, WJ, Lee, MH, Chung, EC,Diffusion-weighted imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for detecting cranial bone marrow metastases: comparison with T1-weighted images, Korean J Radiol, 8, 13, 185-191(2007) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.3.185
  14. Saritas, EU, Lee, JH, Nishimura, DG,SNR dependence of optimal parameters for apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 30, 14, 424-437(2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010.2084583
  15. Kitajima, K, Kaji, Y, Kuroda, K, Sugimura, K,High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio, Magn Reson Med Sci, 7, 15, 93-99(2008) https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.7.93
  16. Rosenkrantz, AB, Kong, X, Niver, BE, Berkman, DS, Melamed, J, Babb, JS,Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 196, 16, 123-129(2011) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4738
  17. DeLano, MC, Cooper, TG, Siebert, JE, Potchen, MJ, Kuppusamy, K,High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 17, 1830-1836(2000)
  18. Shinmoto, H, Oshio, K, Tanimoto, A, Higuchi, N, Okuda, S, Kuribayashi, S,Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer, Magn Reson Imaging, 27, 18, 355-359(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2008.07.008
  19. Hambrock, T, Somford, DM, Huisman, HJ, van Oort, IM, Witjes, JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, CA,Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer, Radiology, , 19, (2011)

Cited by

  1. RE: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: How Can We Use It Accurately? vol.14, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.865
  2. Evaluation of the PI-RADS Scoring System for Classifying mpMRI Findings in Men with Suspicion of Prostate Cancer vol.2013, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/252939
  3. DWI of Prostate Cancer: Optimal b -Value in Clinical Practice vol.2014, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/868269
  4. High b Value (2,000 s/mm 2 ) Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer at 3 Tesla: Comparison with 1,000 s/mm 2 for Tumor Conspicuity and Discrimination o vol.9, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096619
  5. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal testis and variations with age vol.16, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.122865
  6. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis vol.24, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2
  7. Interpretation and reporting multiparametric prostate MRI: a primer for residents and novices vol.39, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0097-x
  8. Comparison of calculated and acquired high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer vol.40, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0246-2
  9. Ratio of Tumor to Normal Prostate Tissue Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Method for Quantifying DWI of the Prostate vol.205, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.14338
  10. High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis vol.56, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114547900
  11. Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706
  12. Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
  13. Computer aided detection in prostate cancer diagnostics: A promising alternative to biopsy? A retrospective study from 104 lesions with histological ground truth vol.12, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185995
  14. PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm2 vol.90, pp.1079, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170438
  15. Quantified analysis of histological components and architectural patterns of gleason grades in apparent diffusion coefficient restricted areas upon diffusion weighted MRI for peripheral or transition vol.46, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25716
  16. Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Basics, Advantages, Cautions, and Future Prospects vol.19, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.832
  17. Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis vol.59, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117702181
  18. Evaluating the Utility of High b-value Computed Diffusion Weighted Imaging Using Extrapolation Technique on the Liver vol.29, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.31159/ksmrt.2019.29.2.19
  19. Diagnostic accuracy of b800 and b1500 DWI-MRI of the pelvis to detect residual rectal adenocarcinoma: a multi-reader study vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02283-x