References
- Kim, CK, Park, BK, Kim, B,Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 194, 1, 1461-1469(2010) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3654
- Yakar, D, Hambrock, T, Huisman, H, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, CA, van Lin, E, Vergunst, H,Feasibility of 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy, Invest Radiol, 45, 2, 121-125(2010) https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c7bcda
- Turkbey, B, Shah, VP, Pang, Y, Bernardo, M, Xu, S, Kruecker, J,Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?, Radiology, 258, 3, 488-495(2011) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100667
- Kim, CK, Park, BK, Kim, B,High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 194, 4, W33-W37(2010) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3004
- Katahira, K, Takahara, T, Kwee, TC, Oda, S, Suzuki, Y, Morishita, S,Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation, Eur Radiol, 21, 5, 188-196(2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1883-7
- Pickles, MD, Gibbs, P, Sreenivas, M, Turnbull, LW,Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T, J Magn Reson Imaging, 23, 6, 130-134(2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20477
- Haider, MA, van der Kwast, TH, Tanguay, J, Evans, AJ, Hashmi, AT, Lockwood, G,Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 189, 7, 323-328(2007) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2211
- deSouza, NM, Riches, SF, Vanas, NJ, Morgan, VA, Ashley, SA, Fisher, C,Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer, Clin Radiol, 63, 8, 774-782(2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.001
- Kim, CK, Park, BK, Lee, HM, Kwon, GY,Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results, Invest Radiol, 42, 9, 842-847(2007) https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181461d21
- Jager, GJ, Ruijter, ET, van de Kaa, CA, de la Rosette, JJ, Oosterhof, GO, Thornbury, JR,Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results, Radiology, 203, 10, 645-652(1997) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169683
- Oto, A, Kayhan, A, Jiang, Y, Tretiakova, M, Yang, C, Antic, T,Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, Radiology, 257, 11, 715-723(2010) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100021
- Heo, SH, Jeong, YY, Shin, SS, Kim, JW, Lim, HS, Lee, JH,Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with the histologic differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, Korean J Radiol, 11, 12, 295-303(2010) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.295
- Moon, WJ, Lee, MH, Chung, EC,Diffusion-weighted imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for detecting cranial bone marrow metastases: comparison with T1-weighted images, Korean J Radiol, 8, 13, 185-191(2007) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2007.8.3.185
- Saritas, EU, Lee, JH, Nishimura, DG,SNR dependence of optimal parameters for apparent diffusion coefficient measurements, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 30, 14, 424-437(2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010.2084583
- Kitajima, K, Kaji, Y, Kuroda, K, Sugimura, K,High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio, Magn Reson Med Sci, 7, 15, 93-99(2008) https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.7.93
- Rosenkrantz, AB, Kong, X, Niver, BE, Berkman, DS, Melamed, J, Babb, JS,Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 196, 16, 123-129(2011) https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4738
- DeLano, MC, Cooper, TG, Siebert, JE, Potchen, MJ, Kuppusamy, K,High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 17, 1830-1836(2000)
- Shinmoto, H, Oshio, K, Tanimoto, A, Higuchi, N, Okuda, S, Kuribayashi, S,Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer, Magn Reson Imaging, 27, 18, 355-359(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2008.07.008
- Hambrock, T, Somford, DM, Huisman, HJ, van Oort, IM, Witjes, JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, CA,Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer, Radiology, , 19, (2011)
Cited by
- RE: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: How Can We Use It Accurately? vol.14, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.865
- Evaluation of the PI-RADS Scoring System for Classifying mpMRI Findings in Men with Suspicion of Prostate Cancer vol.2013, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/252939
- DWI of Prostate Cancer: Optimal b -Value in Clinical Practice vol.2014, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/868269
- High b Value (2,000 s/mm 2 ) Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer at 3 Tesla: Comparison with 1,000 s/mm 2 for Tumor Conspicuity and Discrimination o vol.9, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096619
- Apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal testis and variations with age vol.16, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.122865
- The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis vol.24, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3201-2
- Interpretation and reporting multiparametric prostate MRI: a primer for residents and novices vol.39, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0097-x
- Comparison of calculated and acquired high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer vol.40, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0246-2
- Ratio of Tumor to Normal Prostate Tissue Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Method for Quantifying DWI of the Prostate vol.205, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.14338
- High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis vol.56, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114547900
- Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.706
- Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
- Computer aided detection in prostate cancer diagnostics: A promising alternative to biopsy? A retrospective study from 104 lesions with histological ground truth vol.12, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185995
- PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm–2 vol.90, pp.1079, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170438
- Quantified analysis of histological components and architectural patterns of gleason grades in apparent diffusion coefficient restricted areas upon diffusion weighted MRI for peripheral or transition vol.46, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25716
- Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Basics, Advantages, Cautions, and Future Prospects vol.19, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.832
- Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis vol.59, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117702181
- Evaluating the Utility of High b-value Computed Diffusion Weighted Imaging Using Extrapolation Technique on the Liver vol.29, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.31159/ksmrt.2019.29.2.19
- Diagnostic accuracy of b800 and b1500 DWI-MRI of the pelvis to detect residual rectal adenocarcinoma: a multi-reader study vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02283-x