East Asian Economic Review
- Volume 17 Issue 3
- /
- Pages.243-260
- /
- 2013
- /
- 2508-1640(pISSN)
- /
- 2508-1667(eISSN)
DOI QR Code
The Trade-Agreement Embarrassment
- Ethier, Wilfred J. (University of Pennsylvania)
- Received : 2013.09.03
- Accepted : 2013.09.30
- Published : 2013.09.30
Abstract
The dominant academic literature about trade agreements maintains that they are only about national terms-of-trade manipulation and not at all about purely political concerns. Non-academic economists, commentators, and diplomats by contrast think that trade agreements are all about political concerns. There are two substantive and important distinctions between the two views. i Practitioners maintain that policymakers care virtually not at all about the terms of trade or about trade-tax revenue. ii Practitioners, unlike academics, maintain that trade-agreement negotiations themselves change the underlying political economy. Observation of actual trade policy measures, though not conclusive, suggests that the practitioners are right and that the academics are wrong.
Keywords
- Multilateralism;
- Standard Academic Model;
- Practitioners' Conventional Wisdom;
- Terms of Trade;
- Political Economy