DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Difference of Agricultural Characteristics and Quality with Fertilizer Types in Wheat Cultivation

밑거름 종류에 따른 밀의 농업적 형질 및 품질 차이

  • Kim, Hag-Sin (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jin (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Kyong-Hyun (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Ho (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Chon-Sik (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Ho (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Hyun, Jong-Nae (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Kee-Jong (Winter Cereal and Forage Crop Research Div. NICS, RDA)
  • 김학신 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 김영진 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 김경훈 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 박형호 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 강천식 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 김경호 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 현종내 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부) ;
  • 김기종 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 벼맥류부)
  • Received : 2012.08.09
  • Accepted : 2012.11.20
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to establish the optimum organic fertilization and microbial compost on wheat cultivation in order to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and improve the quality of wheat. The tests resulted in a yield of organic fertilization of 2~6% lower than the yield of standard 4.16 Ton/ha (a yield more than that of microbial compost). The recession was not statistically significant. The trial which involved organic fertilizer that had a yield of 800 kg/ha and microbial compost which had a yield of 2,000 kg/ha resulted in 96% yield of standard trial. The quality of flour in the manure was 50% less during the trial and was not making a good result. In protein content and SDS-sedimentation volume, standard trial had the highest yield in test trial (standard > miccompost > organic fertilization). However, Ash content was not statistically significant.

밀 친환경 재배를 위해 화학비료 사용을 줄이고 밀 품질을 향상하기 위한 유기질비료와 미생물퇴비의 적정 사용량을 설정하고자 시험한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 밀 생육특성 중 간장은 시비량이 많을수록 보리복합비료 처리에서는 컸으나 미생물퇴비와 유기질비료 처리에서는 뚜렷한 차이를 보이지 않았고, 수장은 보리복합비료 > 미생물퇴비 > 유기질비료 순으로 길었으나 시비량 간에는 일정한 경향을 보이지 않았다. 2. 밀 수량구성요소 중 수당입수는 비료 종류나 시비량 간에 차이가 없었고, $m^2$당 경수는 비료 종류 간에는 복합비료 > 유기질비료 > 미생물퇴비 순으로 많았으며, 시비량은 200% 시용에서는 많아 차이를 보였으며, 천립중은 금강밀은 41.1~42.7 g, 조경밀은 41.0~42.9 g 으로 처리 간에 일정한 경향을 보이지 않았다. 3. 비료의 종류에 상관없이 시비량이 증가 할수록 생육 및 수량은 좋았으며, 비종간에는 유기질비료가 미생물 퇴비보다 수량성은 높으나 보리복합비료(관행 4.12 Ton $ha^{-1}$) 대비 2~6%가 감수되었으나 통계적으로 유의성이 없었다. 4. 친환경 자재의 적정 사용량은 표준시비 수준인 유기질 비료은 800 kg $ha^{-1}$, 미생물퇴비는 2,000 kg $ha^{-1}$ 시용으로 95%이상의 수량을 얻을 수 있었다. 5. 밀가루의 품질은 밑거름 50% 감비구에서 다소 떨어지는 경향을 보였으며, 단백질함량과 침전가는 관행복합비료 > 미생물퇴비 > 유기질비료 순이었으나 회분함량은 0.40~0.38%로 일정한 경향을 보이지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chun J. U. and S. W. Kang. 2002. Genetic analyses of heading and maturing dates and their relationship to freezing resistance in barley. Korean. J. Crop Sci. 47(6) : 395-401.
  2. Institute of Agricultural Technology(IAT). 1997. Problems and development direction of the organic agricultural technique (In korean).
  3. Kang, C. S., H. S. Kim, Y. K. Cheong, J. G. Kim, Park, K. H., and C. S. Park, 2008a. Flour characteristics and End-use quality of commercial flour produced from Korean wheat and imported wheat. Korean J. Food Preserv. 5(5) : 687-693.
  4. Kim. H. J. 2008, Environmentally friendly cultivation technology for safe agricultural production, Food Storage and Processing Industry, Vol. 7 (2). 37-48 (In korean).
  5. KREI(Korea Rural Economic Institue). 2010. World Agriculture. 124 : 71-77.
  6. Lee. Y. H., S. M. Lee, J. K. Sung, D. H. Choi, H. M. Kim, and G. H. Ryu. 2006. Development of Soil management Technique in Organic Rice Cultivation. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 14(2) : 205-217.
  7. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF). 2009. Agriculture and Forestry Key Statistics. pp. 208, 273-303 (In korean).
  8. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF). 2011. Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Statistical Yearbook (In korean).
  9. Park. H. H., D. W. Kim, J. J. Hwang, J. T. Kim, and W. H. Kim. 2009. Effect of Organic Fertilizer Application on the Agronomic Traits and Amino Acid Content of Wheat. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. pp. 322.
  10. Park. H. H., D. O. Kim, J. J. Whang, J. H. Sung, J. C. Moon, K. G. Park, N. C. Baek, and O. H. Kim. 2010. Fertilization of organic fertilizer according to the main ingredient of wheat seed changes. The Korean Society of Crop Science. Spring Annual Conference. p. 68 (In korean).
  11. Rural development Administration (RDA). 1994. Report on organic farming (In korean).
  12. Rural development Administration (RDA). 2008-2010. Livestock income Kits (In korean).
  13. Rural Development Administration(RDA), 1995. Standard Survey for Agricultural Testing and Research (In Korean).

Cited by

  1. Phenolic Compounds and Radical Scavenging Activity of the Korean Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) according to Germination Times vol.28, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.5.737
  2. Study of Coidentity Verification of Pesticide Products and Active Ingredients through FT-NIR and FT-IR vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2018.22.4.337
  3. 국산밀 생산을 위한 천안지역 논에서의 밀-벼 이모작 작부체계 vol.64, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2019.64.3.234