DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하지 강직 평가에 있어 NK테이블을 이용한 진자검사의 유용성

Availability of the Pendulum Test Using NK Table for Spasticity Measurement of Low Extremity

  • 김용욱 (전주대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 원종혁 (중부대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김태호 (대구대학교 물리치료학과)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.26
  • 심사 : 2013.05.08
  • 발행 : 2013.05.31

초록

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical availability of the pendulum test (through reliability and validity) using a NK table attached electrogoniometer for spasticity measurement in patients with brain lesions. METHODS: Thirty-one stroke and traumatic brain injury subjects participated in the study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify the test-retest reliability of spasticity measures of the pendulum test. Pearson's product correlation coefficient was used to examine the validity of the pendulum test through the amplitude of the deep tendon reflex (DTR) test known for objective and quantitative measure of spasticity. RESULTS: In these results, the test-retest reliability was showed significantly high correlation between pendulum tests (ICCs=.95~.97, p<.01). There were significant negative correlations between the amplitude of the DTR test and all measures of spasticity of the pendulum test(r=-.77~-.85, p<.01). CONCLUSION: Thus, it is possible to use the pendulum test using a NK table as an objective measure of spasticity, rather than other expensive equipment, which is more complicated to use. Further studies are needed to explore the therapeutic effects of spasticity using a newly designed pendulum test equipment in this study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bajd T, Bowman B. Testing and modelling of spasticity. J Biomed Eng. 1982;4(2):90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(82)90067-X
  2. Bajd T, Vodovnik L. Pendulum testing of spasticity. J Biomed Eng. 984;6(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(84)90003-7
  3. Barnes MP. Medical management of spasticity in stroke. Age Ageing. 2001;30(1):13-16.
  4. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206-207.
  5. Bohannon RW, Harrison S, Kinsella-Shaw J. Reliability and validity of pendulum test measures of spasticity obtained with the Polhemus tracking system from patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6(30):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-1
  6. Bohannon RW. Variability and reliability of the pendulum test for spasticity using a cybex II isokinetic dynamometer. Phys Ther. 1987;67(5):659-661.
  7. Cho KH, Chae JM, Seo JS et al. The quantitative measurement of spasticity using change of muscle length during pendulum test. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2000;24(4):637-644.
  8. Chon JS. The effectiveness of pendulum test for quantifying spasticity in the upper extremity. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 1992;16(4):418-422.
  9. Daly JJ, Marsolais EB, Mendell LM, et al. Therapeutic neural effects of electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996;4(4):218-230. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.547922
  10. Francisco GE, McGuire JR. Poststroke spasticity management. Stroke. 2012;43(11):3132-3136. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639831
  11. Haas BM, Crow JL. Towards a clinical measurement of spasticity? Physiotherapy. 1995;81(8):474-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66743-0
  12. Han TR, Kim JH, Chun MH et al. Evaluation of spasticity in hemiplegic patients. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 1993;17(1):18-25.
  13. Kim SW, Chon JS, Park CI et al. Pendulum test on the knee joint in normal adults. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 1996;20(3):735-740.
  14. Kim YW. Relationship between pendulum test measurements of post-stroke spasticity. J Korea Contents Association. 2010;10(5):325-332.
  15. Kumar RTS, Pandyan AD, Sharma AK. Biomechanical measurement of post-stroke spasticity. Age Aging. 2006;35(4):371-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afj084
  16. Kuruoglu R, Oh SJ. Quantitation of tendon reflexes in normal volunteers. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;33(6):347-351.
  17. Lance JW. Spasticity: disordered motor control. In: Feidman RG, Young RR, Koella WP. Symposium synopsis. Chicago. Year Book Medical Publishers. 1980:485-494.
  18. MP150 System Guide. Santa Barbara. Biopac Systems. 2002.
  19. O'Dell MW, Lin CC, Harrison V. Stroke rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:55-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.042707.104248
  20. Peltonen M, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Time trends in long-term survival after storke: the Northern Sweden Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) study, 1985-1994. Stroke. 1998;29(7): 1358-1365. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.7.1358
  21. Pease WS. Therapeutic electrical stimulation for spasticity: quantitative gait analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77(4):351-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199807000-00021
  22. Sheean G. Neurophysiology of spasticity. In: Barnes MP, Johnson GR, (eds.) Upper motor neuron syndrome and spasticity. Cambridge University Press. 2001:12-78.
  23. Smith AW, Kirtley C, Jamshidi M. Intrarater reliability of manual passive movement velocity in the clinical evaluation of knee extensor muscle tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(10):1428-1431. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.9399
  24. Syczewska M, Lebiedowska MK, Dandyan AD. Quantifying repeatability of the Wartenberg pendulum test parameters in children with spasticity. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;178(2):340-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.031
  25. White H, Uhl TL, Augsburger S, Tylkowski C. Reliability of the three-dimensional pendulum test for able-bodied children and children diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Gait & Posture. 2007;26(1):97-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.012

피인용 문헌

  1. 정상인에 적용한 PNF 하지 패턴이 반대측 하지의 선택적 근수축에 미치는 영향 vol.18, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21598/jkpnfa.2020.18.2.255