DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Paper-based Microfluidic Device for Dry Eye Test

종이-미세유체공학을 이용한 건성안 검사 용지 개발

  • Seo, Young Tae (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Noh, Hyeran (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 서영태 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 노혜란 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2013.04.22
  • Accepted : 2013.06.15
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a dry eye test method using a paper based microfluidic device that improves inaccuracy caused by using one of current point-of-care dry eye tests such as Shirmer's. Methods: Wax printed hydrophilic chromatography papers were dyed with anthocyanin extracts to detect colorimetric display of liquid samples with varying pH. Fluid distribution rates were measured using artificial tears and human tears directly from 32 subjects. Results: With Shirmer's, fluid distribution rates with small amount of samples (less than $0.5{\mu}l$) were not displayed. However, with paper based microfluidic device, fluid imbibition distances over time were clearly showed. Also clinical results of dry eye from newly developed paper based microfluidic device showed correlation with the results from tear break up time tests. Conclusions: The newly developed paper based microfluidic devices were easy to use and exhibited more accurate clinical results than current dry eye point of care tests such as Shirmer's.

목적: 본 연구는 현장현시 건성안 진단 테스트 중에 현재 사용되고 있으나 부정확한 결과로 신뢰도가 떨어지는 쉬르머 용지를 대체 할 수 있는 차세대 건성안 진단 테스트 용지를 미세유체공학을 이용하여 개발하고자 하였다. 방법: 왁스로 패턴을 제조한 친수성 크로마토그래피 용지를 pH에 따른 색 변화가 나타나도록 안토시안으로 염색을 하였다. 인공 누액의 젖음 속도를 인공 누액과 32명의 참가자의 눈물을 이용하여 임상 측정하였다. 결과: 인공 누액을 이용하였을 경우 쉬르머 용지에서는 소량의 용액은(0.5 ml이하) 흡수거리가 도출되지 않았으나 새로 개발된 용지는 시간에 따른 인공 누액의 흡수거리가 확연히 나타났다. 임상실험에서도 새로 개발된 검사 용지는 TBUT (tear break-up time)결과와 부합하는 건성안 진단 결과를 보였다. 결론: 개발된 건성안 진단 용지는 간편하게 사용될 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 기존 쉬르머 용지와 같은 현장현시 건성안 진단 매체와 비교 했을 경우 건성안 판별의 정확성이 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lemp M, Baudouin C, Baum J, Dogru M, Foulks G, Kinshita S, et al. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70081-2
  2. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Schaumberg DA, Smith JA. The changing times in dry eye research. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(8):613-614. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181800298
  3. Lee BJ, Hong JH, Jung DI Park MJ. A study on the confidence of dry eye diagnosis methods. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2008;13(1)15-20.
  4. Kim SA, Seo ES, Lee YH, JM Kim JM. A comparative study of contact lens wearer with dry-eye patient on tear function tests. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2004;9(2):301-312.
  5. Ryu CH, Park HJ, Kim JM, Lee SA Ra, MS. A study on distribution of dry eye and diagnosis methods. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2000;5(2):91-98.
  6. Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, Gilbert DJ. A noninvasive instrument for clinical assessment of the pre-corneal tear film stability. Curr Eye Res. 1985;4(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688508999960
  7. Sahai A, Malik P. Dry eye: prevalence and attributable risk factors in a hospital-based population. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2005;53(2):87-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.16170
  8. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58(4):296-301.
  9. Paschides CA, Kitsios G, Karakostas KX, Psillas C, Moutsopoulos HM. Evaluation of tear break-up time, Schirmer's-I test and rose bengal staining as confirmatory tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1989;7(2):155-157.
  10. Ali MM, Aguirre SD, Xu Y, Filipe CD, Pelton R, Li Y. Detection of DNA using bioactive paper strips. Chem Commun. 2007;21(43):6640-6642.
  11. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Wiley BJ, Gupta, M, Whitesides GM. FLASH: A rapid method for prototyping paper-based microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2008;8(12):2146-2150. https://doi.org/10.1039/b811135a
  12. Noh N, Phillips ST. Fluidic Timers for Time-Dependent, Point-of-Care Assays on Paper. Anal Chem. 2010;82(19): 8071-8078. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1005537
  13. Noh H, Phillips ST. Metering the capillary-driven flow of fluids in paper-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem. 2010;82(10):4181-4187. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100431y
  14. Kim HS, Noh H. Quantifying the Fluid Volumes in Paper Microfluidic Devices for Dry Eye Test. Macromol Res. 2013;21(7):788-792 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-013-1081-y
  15. Carrilho E, Martinez AW, Whitesides GM. Understanding Wax Printing: A Simple Micropatterning Process for Paper- Based Microfluidics. Anal Chem. 2009;81(16):7091-7095. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901071p
  16. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(3): 362-373.
  17. Washburn, E. The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev. 1923;17(3):273-283.
  18. Washburn, EW. Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A, 1921;7(4):115-116. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.7.4.115
  19. Kissa, E. Wetting and Wicking. Tex Res J. 1996;66(10): 660-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759606601008
  20. Gilbard JP, Rossi SR, Heyda KG. Ophthalmic solutions, the ocular surface, and a unique therapeutic artificial tear formulation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107(4):348-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90657-0
  21. McCann LC, Tomlinson A, Pearce EI, Papa V. Effectiveness of artificial tears in the management of evaporative dry eye. Clin. Sci. 2012;31(1):1-5.
  22. Frensdorff HK, Watson MT, Kauzmann W. The Kinetics of Protein Denaturation. IV. The Viscosity and Gelation of Urea Solutions of Ovalbumin 1. J Am Chem Soc. 1953; 75(21):5157-5166. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01117a004
  23. Saleh TA, McDermott B, Bates AK, Ewings P. Phenol red thread test vs Schirmer's test: a comparative study. Eye(Lond). 2006;20(8):913-915.
  24. Tomlinson A, Blades, KJ, Pearce EI. What does the Phenol Red Thread Test Actually Measure?. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(3):142-146.