대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High-fidelity와 Multi-mode 시뮬레이션을 이용한 학습 효과 비교 : 심정지 환자 응급간호 적용

Comparison of Learning Effects using High-fidelity and Multi-mode Simulation: An Application of Emergency Care for a Patient with Cardiac Arrest

  • Ryoo, Eon-Na (Department of Nursing, Shinsung University) ;
  • Ha, Eun-Ho (Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Young (Graduate School of Nursing, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.04
  • 심사 : 2012.11.08
  • 발행 : 2013.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Simulation-based learning has become a powerful method to improve the quality of care and help students meet the challenges of increasingly complex clinical practice settings. The purpose of this study was to identify the learning effects using high-fidelity SimMan and multi-mode simulation. Methods: Participants in this study were 38 students who were enrolled in an intensive course for a major in nursing at R college. Collected data were analyzed using Chi-square, t-test, and independent t-test with the SPSS 18.0 for Windows Program. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in learning effects between high-fidelity SimMan and multi-mode simulation group. However, skills in clinical performance in the high-fidelity SimMan group were higher than in the multi-mode group (p=.014), communication in clinical performance in multi-mode simulation group was higher than in the high-fidelity SimMan group (p<.001). Conclusion: Multi-mode simulation with a standardized patient is an effective learning method in many ways compared to a high-fidelity simulator. These results suggest that multi-mode simulation be offered to students in nursing colleges which cannot afford to purchase a high-fidelity simulator, or offered as an alternative.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213- e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011, July 16). TeamSTEPPS: National implementation. Retrieved March 20, 2012, from http://teamstepps. ahrq.gov/abouttoolsmaterials.htm
  3. Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), 359-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03810.x
  4. Becker, K. L., Rose, L. E., Berg, J. B., Park, H., & Shatzer, J. H. (2006). The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(4), 103-111.
  5. Crea, K. A. (2011). Practice skill development through the use of human patient simulation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe759188
  6. Crofts, J. F., Bartlett, C., Ellis, D., Hunt, L. P., Fox, R., & Draycott, T. J. (2006). Training for shoulder dystocia: A trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(6), 1477-1485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000246801.45977.c8
  7. Crofts, J. F., Bartlett, C., Ellis, D., Winter, C., Donald, F., Hunt, L. P., et al. (2008). Patient-actor perception of care: A comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17(1), 20-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.200 6.021873
  8. Dreifuerst, K. T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(6), 326-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834- 2012040 9-02
  9. Gates, M. G., Parr, M. B., & Hughen, J. E. (2012). Enhancing nursing knowledge using high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(1), 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20111116-01
  10. Gordon, J. A., Brown, D. F., & Armstrong, E. G. (2006). Can a simulated critical care encounter accelerate basic science learning among preclinical medical students? A pilot study. Simulation in Healthcare, 1, 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600010-00005
  11. Hatala, R., Issenberg, S. B., Kassen, B., Cole, G., Bacchus, C. M., & Scalese, R. J. (2008). Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: A comparison study. Medical Education, 42(6), 628-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02953.x
  12. Kardong-Edgren, S., Anderson, M., & Michaels, J. (2007). Does simulation fidelity improve student test scores? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 3(1), e21-e24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.035
  13. Kardong-Edgren, S., Lungstrom, N., & Bendel, R. (2009). $VitalSim^{(R)}$ versus $SimMan^{(R)}$: A comparison of BSN student test scores, knowledge retention, and satisfaction. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(3), e105-e111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.01.007
  14. Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskeva, P., & Darzi, A. (2002). An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education, 36(7), 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x
  15. Lee, S. J., Roh, Y. S., Kim, J. O., Jang, K. I., Ryoo, E. N., & Park, Y. M. (2010). Comparison of multi-mode simulation and $SimMan^{(R)}$simulation on evaluation of nursing care for patients with dyspnea. Journal of Korean Academy Society of Nursing Education, 16(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2010.16.1.051
  16. Marken, P. A., Zimmerman, C., Kennedy, C., Schremmer, R., & Smith, K. V. (2010). Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(7), 120. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7407120
  17. Maxson, P. M., Dozois, E. J., Holubar, S. D., Wrobleski, D. M., Dube, J. A., Klipfel, J. M., et al. (2011). Enhancing nurse and physician collaboration in clinical decision making through high-fidelity interdisciplinary simulation training. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 86(1), 31-36. http://dx.doi. org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0282
  18. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003- 2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.136 5-2923.2009.03547.x
  19. Park, J. S. (2012, March). Accreditation standards for nursing education accreditation assessment. Paper presented at the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education, Seoul.
  20. Riley, R. H. (2010). Manual of simulation in healthcare (Korean Society for Simulation in Healthcare, Trans.). Seoul: Yedangbook. (Original work published 2008)
  21. Ryan, C. A., Walshe, N., Gaffney, R., Shanks, A., Burgoyne, L., & Wiskin, C. M. (2010). Using standardized patients to assess communication skills in medical and nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 10, 24. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-24
  22. Schlegel, C., Woermann, U., Shaha, M., Rethans, J. J., & van der Vleuten, C. (2012). Effects of communication training on real practice performance: A role-play module versus a standardized patient module. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(1), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/ 01484834-20111116-02
  23. Seybert, A. L., & Kane-Gill, S. L. (2011). Elective course in acute care using online learning and patient simulation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe75354
  24. Sleeper, J. A., & Thompson, C. (2008). The use of hi fidelity simulation to enhance nursing students' therapeutic communication skills. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5, 1-12. http://dx.doi. org/10.2202/1548-923x.1555
  25. Taekman, J. M., & Shelley, K. (2010). Virtual environments in healthcare: Immersion, disruption, and flow. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 48(3), 101-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181eace73
  26. Thomas, C., & Mackey, E. (2012). Influence of a clinical simulation elective on baccalaureate nursing student clinical confidence. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(4), 236-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834- 20120224-03
  27. Wisborg, T., Brattebo, G., Brinchmann-Hansen, A., & Hansen, K. S. (2009). Mannequin or standardized patient: Participants' assessment of two training modalities in trauma team simulation. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 17, 59. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-59
  28. Wotton, K., Davis, J., Button, D., & Kelton, M. (2010). Third-year undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(11), 632-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.39 28/01484834-20100831-01 https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100831-01
  29. Yoo, M. S., & Yoo, I. Y. (2001). The effectiveness of standardized patient managed instruction for a fundamentals of nursing course. Journal of Nursing Query, 10(1), 89-109.

피인용 문헌

  1. 공학급 국방 모델의 시뮬레이션 성능 향상을 위한 다중 충실도 M&S 기법 연구 vol.22, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9709/jkss.2013.22.4.067
  2. Effects of Multi-mode Simulation Learning on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Disposition, Problem Solving Process, and Clinical Competence vol.26, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.1.107
  3. 뇌졸중 대상자간호 시뮬레이션 교육이 간호학생의 수행능력과 만족도에 미치는 효과 vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2015.16.1.408
  4. 표준화환자 시뮬레이션 실습교육이 간호학생의 수혈 간호수행능력, 의사소통능력, 자기효능감과 비판적 사고능력에 미치는 효과 vol.22, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.1.49
  5. 간호학생의 학습성과 달성과 연계된 시뮬레이션 실습 설계와 운영 vol.21, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.3.393
  6. 간호학생을 대상으로 한 통합(모성-아동) 시뮬레이션 프로그램 개발 및 효과 vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2015.21.4.293
  7. 시뮬레이션 후 구조화된 자가 디브리핑이 간호대학생의 임상수행능력, 자기효능감 및 교육 만족도에 미치는 효과 vol.21, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.445
  8. 심정지 시뮬레이션 교육이 간호학생의 지식, 자신감, 비판적 사고성향 및 임상수행능력에 미치는 효과 vol.28, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2016.28.4.447
  9. 급성 심장질환자 간호에 대한 웹기반 시뮬레이션과 고충실도 시뮬레이션 교육 효과 vol.23, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.1.95
  10. 시뮬레이션 기반 심정지 응급간호교육에서 팀 디브리핑의 효과 vol.29, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2017.29.6.667
  11. 간호대학생들을 위한 시뮬레이션 교육프로그램 개발 및 적용효과 vol.16, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2018.16.2.203
  12. 간호대학생의 심정지 시뮬레이션 실습 경험 vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17703/jcct.2018.4.1.119
  13. 저충실도 시뮬레이터를 활용한 신규간호사의 응급상황관리 시뮬레이션 교육의 효과 vol.25, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.3.331
  14. 천식 아동 간호에 대한 가상현실 시뮬레이션과 블렌디드 시뮬레이션 교육 효과 vol.25, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.4.496
  15. 문제중심학습 통합 시뮬레이션교육이 간호대학생의 간호지식, 비판적 사고성향, 문제 해결 능력 및 수업 몰입도에 미치는 효과 vol.26, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.03.15.1
  16. Comparison of Learning Effects of Virtual Reality Simulation on Nursing Students Caring for Children with Asthma vol.17, pp.22, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228417
  17. Comparison of Learning Transfer Using Simulation Problem-Based Learning and Demonstration: An Application of Papanicolaou Smear Nursing Education vol.18, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041765
  18. Effects of hot and cold debriefing in simulation with case‐based learning vol.18, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12410
  19. Development and Effects of a Nursing Education Program Using Virtual Reality for Enhancing Clinical Decision-Making Ability in Respiratory Disease Nursing Care vol.28, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.4.458