DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Method of Safety Condition Evaluation using Analytic Hierarchy Process

AHP를 이용한 기업별 안전평가 기법에 관한 연구

  • 백신원 (한경대학교 토목안전환경공학과) ;
  • 이미선 (한경대학교 토목안전환경공학과)
  • Received : 2013.03.07
  • Accepted : 2013.05.06
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

In the current domestic, many industrial accidents have happened. And these are analyzed according to several factors. But it is difficult that they evaluate their business safety. Thus, we conducted a study on business specific safety assessment techniques in order that business know their safety level and perform appropriative safety activities. Study methods are survey and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Each specific weighting factors to calculate the survey was conducted for safety and consulting experts (20 persons). Weight factor was used to AHP decision support as one of the ways through a number of alternatives to the ratings for the Minesota Multiphasic. Factors are each type of industry, specific industrial scale, disaster type and strength, worker age and tenure period, and region. First, survey was conducted with 20 professionals to estimate the weighting factors. Weights between factors using the AHP analysis tool based on the mean values were calculated. Second, last 3 years between the industrial accidents statistics were used to calculate the weights for each of the rating factors in the Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Grade weights between each factor which was based on the rating of each factor was calculated as the average of three years. Finally, the weights between each factor and the grade weights for each factor using the safety level of the enterprise were calculated so that you can evaluate the weighting.

Keywords

References

  1. Byungin, G., 1999. Disaster Statistical Analysis Using Multivariate Analysis Techniques. Spring Conference of the Korean Society of Safety 40 (in Korean).
  2. Sunok Song, 2011. A Study on the Selection of the International Ship Logistics Usging the AHP. Journal of Korea Association for International Commerce and Information 13(2): 95-117 (in Korean).
  3. Bae, S., and H. Chung, 2007. Development of a Rural Amenity Values Assessment Model by Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 49(5): 33-44 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2007.49.5.033
  4. Park, J., Y. Shin, Y. Ahn, and K. Lee 2009. Measurement of Value Engineering for Bridge Superstructures Using Anlytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 24(6): 105-110 (in Korean).
  5. Lee, J., and S. Chang, 2012. Measurement of Severity of Hazards and Investment in Occupational Safety & Health According to Ship Types Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 27(1): 105-110 (in Korean).
  6. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, 2008-2010, Analysis of Industrial Accidents (in Korean).

Cited by

  1. A Study on the AHP based Evaluation Criteria for the Combinatorial Technology of Smart Water Grid vol.28, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2014.28.1.103