Computers and Concrete

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.51-61
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of 3D earthquake response of the Arhavi Highway Tunnel considering soil-structure interaction

  • Sevim, Baris (Yildiz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.27
  • 심사 : 2012.04.17
  • 발행 : 2013.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper describes earthquake response of the Arhavi Highway Tunnel its geometrical properties, 3D finite element model and the linear time history analyses under a huge ground motion considering soil-structure interaction. The Arhavi Highway Tunnel is one of the tallest tunnels constructed in the Black Sea region of Turkey as part of the Coast Road Project. The tunnel has two tubes and each of them is about 1000 m tall. In the study, lineartime history analyses of the tunnel are performed applying north-south, east-west and up accelerations components of 1992 Erzincan, Turkey ground motion. In the time history analyses, Rayleigh damping coefficients are calculated using main natural frequency obtained from modal analysis. Element matrices are computed using the Gauss numerical integration technique. The Newmark method is used in the solution of the equation of motion. Because of needed too much memory for the analyses, the first 10 second of the ground motions, which is the most effective duration, is taken into account in calculations. The results obtained 3D finite element model are presented. In addition, the displacement and stress results are observed to be allowable level of the concrete material during the earthquakes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amberg, W. and Russo, M. (2001), "Seismic design of underground structures - the Bolu Tunnel", Proceedings of the AITES-ITA 2001 World Tunnel Congress, Milano, Italy, 1, 137-147.
  2. ANSYS. (2012), Swanson analysis system, USA.
  3. Asakura, T., Tsukada, K., Matsunaga, T., Matsuoka, S., Yashiro, K., Shiba, Y. and Oya, T. (2000), "Damage to mountain tunnels by earthquake and its mechanism", Proceedings of JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers), 659, 27-38.
  4. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite element procedures in engineering analysis, Prentica Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  5. Cengiz Project. (2006), Cengiz project, Black Sea Coast Road Project, Artvin, Turkey.
  6. Cheng, C.Y., Dasari, G.R., Chow, Y.K. and Leung, C.F. (2007), "Finite element analysis of tunnel-soil-pile interaction using displacement controlled model", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 22(4), 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.08.002
  7. G.D.H. (2006), General directorate of highways, Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  8. Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J. and Schmid, J.I.C. (2001), "Seismic design and analysis of underground structures", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 16(4), 247-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
  9. Kolymbas, D. (2005), Tunelling and tunnel mechanics: A rational approach to tunneling, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
  10. Lanzano, G., Bilotta, E. and Russo, G. (2001), Seismic soil-tunnel-structure interaction analysis and retrofit of the Posey-Webster Street Tunnels, 2nd UJNR Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, Tsukuba, Japan.
  11. Mroueh, H. and Shahrour, I. (2008), "A simplified 3D model for tunnel construction using tunnel boring machines", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 23(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.11.008
  12. PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) (2012), http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data.
  13. Power, M.S., Rosidi, D. and Kaneshiro, J. (1996), Vol. III Strawman: screening, evaluation, and retrofit design of tunnels. Report Draft, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  14. Satır, B. (2007), Determining deformations of tunnel with geodetic, geotechnical and finite element method, MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey, (In Turkish).
  15. Sevim, B. (2011), "Nonlinear earthquake behaviour of highway tunnels", Nat. Hazard. Earth Sys., 11(10), 2755-2763. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2755-2011
  16. USACE. (2003), Time-history dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic structures, Engineering and Design, USA.

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigation of earthquake angle effect on the seismic performance of steel bridges vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.855
  2. Seismic Acceleration Spectrum of Ground Surface under Urban Subway Tunnels with Circular Cross Sections in Soil Deposits Based on SSI vol.2019, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2076961
  3. Blasting Response of a Two-Storey RC Building Under Different Charge Weight of TNT Explosives vol.44, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00256-0
  4. Safety assessment of an underground tunnel subjected to missile impact using numerical simulations vol.27, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.27.1.001
  5. A Study on the Dynamic Behavior of a Vertical Tunnel Shaft Embedded in Liquefiable Ground during Earthquakes vol.11, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041560