DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soil structure interaction effects on structural parameters for stiffness degrading systems built on soft soil sites

  • Received : 2012.05.18
  • Accepted : 2013.02.19
  • Published : 2013.03.10

Abstract

In this study, strength reduction factors and inelastic displacement ratios are investigated for SDOF systems with period range of 0.1-3.0 s considering soil structure interaction for earthquake motions recorded on soft soil. The effect of stiffness degradation on strength reduction factors and inelastic displacement ratios is investigated. The modified-Clough model is used to represent structures that exhibit significant stiffness degradation when subjected to reverse cyclic loading and the elastoplastic model is used to represent non-degrading structures. The effect of negative strain - hardening on the inelastic displacement and strength of structures is also investigated. Soil structure interacting systems are modeled and analyzed with effective period, effective damping and effective ductility values differing from fixed-base case. For inelastic time history analyses, Newmark method for step by step time integration was adapted in an in-house computer program. New equations are proposed for strength reduction factor and inelastic displacement ratio of interacting system as a function of structural period($\tilde{T}$, T) ductility (${\mu}$) and period lengthening ratio ($\tilde{T}$/T).

Keywords

References

  1. Applied Technology Council - ATC (1984), "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings", Rep. ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council, California.
  2. Aviles, J. and Perez-Rocha, L.E. (2005), "Influence of foundation flexibility on $R{\mu}$ and $C{\mu}$ factors", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 131, No.2.
  3. Aviles, J. and Perez-Rocha, L.E. (2011), "Use of global ductility for design of structure-foundation systems", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 1018-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.03.008
  4. Ayoub, A. and Chenouda, M. (2009), "Response spectra of degrading structural systems", Engineering Structures, 31, 1393-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.006
  5. Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G. (1988), Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications, Wiley, New York.
  6. Borzi, B., Calvi, G.M., Elnashai, A.S., Faccioli, E. and Bommer, J.J. (2001), "Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design", Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 21(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00075-0
  7. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004) "Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: Single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems", Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9), 1309-1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309)
  8. Clough, R.W. and Johnston, S.B. (1966), "Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements", Proc. of the Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan.
  9. Decanini, L., Liberatore, L. and Mollaioli, F. (2003), "Characterization of displacement demand for elastic and inelastic SDOF systems", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23,455-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00062-9
  10. Elghadamsi, F.E. and Mohraz, B. (1987), "Inelastic earthquake spectra", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 15, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150107
  11. Eser, M. and ve Aydemir, C. (2011), "The effect of soil-structure interaction on inelastic displacement ratio of structures", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 39(5), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.5.683
  12. Eser, M., ve Aydemir, C. and ve Ekiz,I. (2012), "Soil structure interaction effects on strength reduction factors", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 41(3), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.3.365
  13. Eser, M., Aydemir, C. and ve Ekiz, I. (2012), "Inelastic displacement ratios for structures with foundation flexibility", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(1), DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-1266-5.
  14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003), "Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures", Rep. FEMA-450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC).
  15. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009), "Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response", FEMA P440A, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC).
  16. Ghannad, M.A. and Jahankhah, H. (2007), "Site-dependent strength reduction factors for soil-structure systems", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.002
  17. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1998), "Effect of stiffness degradation on deformation demands for SDOF and MDOF structures." Proc., 6th Natl. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
  18. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (1998), "Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands", Proc., 6th Natl. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
  19. Lai, S.P. and Biggs, J.M. (1980), "Inelastic response spectra for a seismic building design", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 106, 1295-310.
  20. Lee, L.H., Han, S.W. and Oh, Y.H. (1999), "Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic models", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(9), 957-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<957::AID-EQE849>3.0.CO;2-K
  21. Miranda, E. (1993), "Site dependent strength reduction factors", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119(12), 3503-3519. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3503)
  22. Miranda, E. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2002), "Influence of stiffness degradation on strength demands of structures built on soft soil sites", Engineering Structures, 24(10), 1271-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00052-4
  23. Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991), "Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems", Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  24. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1973). "Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities", Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 209-236.
  25. Rahnama, M. and Krawinkler, H. (1993), "Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic demands", Rep. No. 108, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Stanford, California.
  26. Raychowdhury, P. (2011), "Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil-structure interaction (SSI)", Engineering Structures, 33, 958-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.017
  27. Riddell, R. and Newmark, N.M. (1979), "Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes", Structural Research Series No. 468, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana.
  28. Riddell, R., Hidalgo, P. and Cruz, E. (1989), "Response modification factors for earthquake resistant design of short period structures", Earthquake Spectra, 5(3), 571-590. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585541
  29. Roy, R. and Dutta, S.C. (2010), "Inelastic seismic demand of low-rise buildings with soil-flexibility", International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 45, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.12.014
  30. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2004), "Inelastic displacement ratios for design of structures on soft soils sites", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(12), 2051-2061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2051)
  31. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006), "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soils sites", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.552
  32. StatSoft Inc. (1995), STATISTICA V.6.0 for Windows, Tulsa, OK, USA.
  33. Veletsos, A.S. and Newmark, N.M. (1960), "Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions", Proc. of the Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 895-912.
  34. Veletsos, A.S., Newmark, N.M. and Chelapati, C.V. (1965), "Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions", Proc. of the Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 7, New Zealand.
  35. Veletsos, A.S. and Meek, J.W. (1974), "Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 3, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030203
  36. Veletsos, A.S. and Nair, V.V.D. (1975), "Seismic interaction of structures on hysteretic foundations", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 101(1), 935-956.
  37. Veletsos, A.S. (1977), "Dynamics of structure-foundation systems", Structural Geotechnical Mechanics, Ed. W.J. Hall, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 333-361.
  38. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1992), "A procedure for determining consistent inelastic design spectra", Proc. of Workshop on nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures, Slovenia.
  39. Wolf, J.P. (1994), "Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models", Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
  40. Wolf, J.P. and Somaini, D.R. (1986), "Approximate dynamic model of embedded foundation in time domain", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 14, 683-703. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140502

Cited by

  1. Residual displacement estimation of simple structures considering soil structure interaction vol.16, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.1.069
  2. Implication of Soil-Structure Interaction on Deteriorate Existing Frames in Penang vol.864, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/864/1/012035
  3. A polynomial mathematical tool for foundation-soil-foundation interaction vol.23, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.23.6.547