Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제45권5호
  • /
  • Pages.595-611
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study of three collocation point methods for odd order stochastic response surface method

  • Li, Dian-Qing (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University) ;
  • Jiang, Shui-Hua (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University) ;
  • Cheng, Yong-Gang (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University) ;
  • Zhou, Chuang-Bing (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education), Wuhan University)
  • 투고 : 2011.03.27
  • 심사 : 2013.02.19
  • 발행 : 2013.03.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper aims to compare three collocation point methods associated with the odd order stochastic response surface method (SRSM) in a systematical and quantitative way. The SRSM with the Hermite polynomial chaos is briefly introduced first. Then, three collocation point methods, namely the point method, the root method and the without origin method underlying the odd order SRSMs are highlighted. Three examples are presented to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the three methods. The results indicate that the condition that the Hermite polynomial information matrix evaluated at the collocation points has a full rank should be satisfied to yield reliability results with a sufficient accuracy. The point method and the without origin method are much more efficient than the root method, especially for the reliability problems involving a large number of random variables or requiring complex finite element analysis. The without origin method can also produce sufficiently accurate reliability results in comparison with the point and root methods. Therefore, the origin often used as a collocation point is not absolutely necessary. The odd order SRSMs with the point method and the without origin method are recommended for the reliability analysis due to their computational accuracy and efficiency. The order of SRSM has a significant influence on the results associated with the three collocation point methods. For normal random variables, the SRSM with an order equaling or exceeding the order of a performance function can produce reliability results with a sufficient accuracy. The order of SRSM should significantly exceed the order of the performance function involving strongly non-normal random variables.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anile, A.M., Spinella, S. and Rinaudo, S. (2003), "Stochastic response surface method and tolerance analysis in microeletronics", Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electr. Eng., 22(2), 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/03321640310459234
  2. Atkinson, R. (1988), An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, (2nd edition), John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.
  3. Au, S.K. and Beck, J.L. (1999), "A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations", Struct. Saf., 21(2),135-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4
  4. Basaga, H.B. Bayraktar, A. and Kaymaz, I. (2012), "An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.2.175
  5. Bucher, C.G. and Bourgund, U. (1990), "A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems", Struct. Saf., 7(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E
  6. Cheng, J. and Li, Q.S. (2009), "Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions", Comput. Mech., 43(4), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0320-0
  7. Eldred, M.S., Webster, C.G. and Constantine, P. (2008), "Evaluation of non-intrusive approaches for Wiener- Askey generalized polynomial chaos", Proceedings of the 10th AIAA nondeterministic approaches conference, AIAA-2008-1892, Schaumburg, IL.
  8. Ghanem, R.G. and Spanos, P.D. (2003), Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, (Revised version), Dover Publication Inc, Mineola, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Huang, S.P., Liang, B. and Phoon, K.K. (2009), "Geotechnical probabilistic analysis by collocation-based stochastic response surface method-An EXCEL add-in implementation", Georisk, 3(2), 75-86.
  10. Huang, S.P., Mahadevan, S. and Rebba, R. (2007), "Collocation-based stochastic finite element analysis for random field problems", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 22 (2), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2006.11.004
  11. Isukapalli, S.S. (1999), "Uncertainty analysis of transport transformation models", Ph.D. Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
  12. Isukapalli, S.S., Roy, A. and Georgopoulos, P.G. (1998), "Stochastic response surface methods for uncertainty propagation: application to environmental and biological systems", Risk Anal., 18(3), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01301.x
  13. Isukapalli, S.S., Roy, A. and Georgopoulos, P.G. (2000), "Efficient sensitivity / uncertainty analysis using the combined stochastic response surface method and the automated differentiation: application to environmental and biological systems", Risk Anal., 20(5), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205054
  14. Kaymaz, I. and McMahon, C.A. (2005), "A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability anslysis", Probab. Eng. Mech., 20(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.05.005
  15. Li, D.Q., Chen, Y.F., Lu, W.B. and Zhou, C.B. (2011), "Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables", Comput. Geotech., 38(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.10.006
  16. Li, D.Q., Jiang, S.H., Chen, Y.F. and Zhou, C.B. (2012a), "Reliability analysis of serviceability performance of underground cavern using stochastic response surface method", KSCE J. Civil Eng. (In Press)
  17. Li, D.Q., Wu, S.B., Zhou, C.B. and Phoon, K.K. (2012b), "Performance of translation approach for modeling correlated non-normal variables", Struct. Saf., 39, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.08.001
  18. Li, H. and Zhang, D. (2007), "Probabilistic collocation method for flow in porous media: comparisons with other stochastic method", Water Resour. Res., 43(W09409), 44-48.
  19. Li, H.S., Lu, Z.Z. and Qiao, H.W. (2010), "A new high-order response surface method for structural reliability analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 34(6), 779-799. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.34.6.779
  20. Mao, N., Tamara, Al-B. and Soubra, A.H. (2012), "Probabilistic analysis and design of strip foundations resting on rocks obeying Hoek-Brown failure criterion", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 49(1): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.005
  21. Mollon, G., Dias, D. and Soubra, A.H. (2011), "Probabilistic analysis of pressurized tunnels against face stability using collocation-based stochastic response surface method", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 137(4), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000443
  22. Nguyen, X.S., Sellier, A., Duprat, F. and Pons, G. (2009), "Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 24(2), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.04.001
  23. Noh, Y., Choi, K.K. and Du, L. (2009), "Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula", Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim., 38(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0277-9
  24. Phoon, K.K. (2003), "Representation of random variables using orthogonal polynomials", Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, San Francisco, 1, 97-104.
  25. Phoon, K.K. and Huang, S.P. (2007), "Uncertainty quantification using multi-dimensional Hermite polynomials", Geotechnical Special Publication, GSP 170: Probabilistic applications in geotechnical engineering, Reston, VA, ASCE, 1-10.
  26. Sudret, B. (2008), "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 93(7), 964-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
  27. Tatang, M.A., Pan, W., Prinn, R.G. and McRae, G.J. (1997), "An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models", J. Geophys. Res., 102(D18), 21925-21932. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01654
  28. Webster, M., Tatang, M.A. and Mcrae, G.J. (1996), "Application of the probabilistic collocation method for an uncertainty analysis of a simple ocean model", MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Report Series No. 4, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
  29. Xiu, D.B. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2003), "Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos", J. Comput. Phys., 187(1), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-5

피인용 문헌

  1. The Stochastic Response Surface Method for Small-Signal Stability Study of Power System With Probabilistic Uncertainties in Correlated Photovoltaic and Loads vol.32, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2672803
  2. Probabilistic analysis of groundwater and radionuclide transport model from near surface disposal facilities vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2017.1329538
  3. An efficient response surface method considering the nonlinear trend of the actual limit state vol.47, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.1.045
  4. Solution of a stochastic Darcy equation by polynomial chaos expansion vol.10, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995423917030077
  5. An efficient simulation method for reliability analysis of systems with expensive-to-evaluate performance functions vol.55, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.979
  6. Capabilities of stochastic response surface method and response surface method in reliability analysis vol.49, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.1.111
  7. A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties vol.187, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.003
  8. Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method vol.168, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.006
  9. Uncertainty analysis of rock failure behaviour using an integration of the probabilistic collocation method and elasto-plastic cellular automaton vol.28, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(15)30048-3
  10. Uncertainty quantification and stochastic polynomial chaos expansion for recovering random data in Darcy and Diffusion equations vol.25, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1515/jiip-2016-0037
  11. Efficient method for probabilistic estimation of spatially varied hydraulic properties in a soil slope based on field responses: A Bayesian approach 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.11.012
  12. Unsaturated soil slope characterization with Karhunen–Loève and polynomial chaos via Bayesian approach pp.1435-5663, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0610-x
  13. 인공신경망 기반의 응답면 기법을 이용한 사면의 지진에 대한 취약도 곡선 작성 vol.32, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2016.32.11.31
  14. Reliability Analysis of Differential Settlement of Strip Footings by Stochastic Response Surface Method vol.43, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0114-3
  15. Efficient Probabilistic Stability Analysis of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes Using Collocation-Based Stochastic Response Surface vol.21, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002157
  16. Probabilistic stability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes under pseudo-static and modified pseudo-dynamic conditions vol.49, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.07.005