DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of structural dynamic reliability based on the probability density evolution method

  • Fang, Yongfeng (Key Laboratory of Electronic Equipment Structure Design, Ministry of Education, Xidian University) ;
  • Chen, Jianjun (Key Laboratory of Electronic Equipment Structure Design, Ministry of Education, Xidian University) ;
  • Tee, Kong Fah (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.19
  • 심사 : 2012.12.15
  • 발행 : 2013.01.25

초록

A new dynamic reliability analysis of structure under repeated random loads is proposed in this paper. The proposed method is developed based on the idea that the probability density of several times random loads can be derived from the probability density of single-time random load. The reliability prediction models of structure based on time responses under several times random loads with and without strength degradation are obtained by using the stress-strength interference theory and probability density evolution method. The resulting differential equations in the prediction models can be solved by using the forward finite difference method. Then, the probability density functions of strength redundancy of the structures can be obtained. Finally, the structural dynamic reliability can be calculated using integral method. The efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated numerically through a speed reducer. The results have shown that the proposed method is practicable, feasible and gives reasonably accurate prediction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Au, S., Ching, J. and Beck, J.(2007), "Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems", Struct. Safety, 29(1), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.008
  2. Basaga, B., Bayraktar, A. and Kaymaz, I. (2012), "An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures", Structural Engineering and mechanics, 42(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.2.175
  3. Benfratello, B., Cirone, L. and Giambance, F. (2006), "A multicriterion design of steel frames with shakedown constrains", Computers and Structures, 84(5-6), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.015
  4. Chen, J.B. and Li, J. (2004), "Probability density evolution of linear stochastic structural response", ACTA Mechanica Solid Sinica, 25(1), 119-124.
  5. Chen, J.B. and Li, J. (2004), "Difference method for probability density evolution equation of stochastic structural response", Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 25(1), 121-128.
  6. Chen, J.J. (1994), "Analysis of engineering structures response to random wind excitation", Computers & Structures, 51(6), 687-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(05)80007-0
  7. Chen, J.J., Che, J.W., Ma, H.B. and Dai, J. (2001), "Dynamic optimum design on reliability for truss structures", Acta Mechnica Solida Sinica, 22(1), 54-62.
  8. Dilip, R. and Tanmoy, D. (2001), "A discretizing approach for evaluating reliability of complex systems under stress-strength model", IEEE Transaction on reliability, 50(2),145-150. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.963121
  9. Fang, Y.F. and Chen, J.J. (2012), "Model of structure dynamic reliability with four types of stochastic loads", Advances in Information Sciences and Services Sciences, 4(8), 257-264-527.
  10. Fang, Y.F., Chen, J.J. and Ma, H.B. (2013), "Structural dynamic reliability calculation under three types of stochastic loads ", Journal of Vibration and Shock, 32(1), 118-122.
  11. Gao, W., Chen, J.J. and Ma, H.B. (2003), "Dynamic response analysis of closed loop control system for intelligent truss structures based on probability", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 15(2), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2003.15.2.239
  12. Katafygiotis, L. and Zuev, K.(2008), "Geometric insight into the challenges of solving high-dimensional reliability problems", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 23(2), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.026
  13. Kmet, S., Tomko, M. and Brda, J. (2011), "Time-dependent analysis of cable trusses part II. Simulation-based reliability assessment", Structural Emngineering and Mechanics, 38(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.2.171
  14. Knut, O.R. and Gunner, C.L. (2000), "Reliability-based design of wind-turbine rotor blades against failure in ultimate loading", Engineering Structures, 22(1), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00014-0
  15. Li, J. and Chen, J.B. (2008), "The principle of preservation of probability and the generalized density evolution equation", Structural Safety, 30(9), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.08.001
  16. Li, J. and Chen, J.B. (2004), "Probability density evolution method for dynamic reliability analysis of stochastic structures", Journal of Vibration Engineering, 17(2), 121-128.
  17. Moustafa, A. and Mahadevan, S. (2011), "Reliability analysis of uncertain structures using earthquake response spectra", Earthquakes and Structure, 2(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.3.279
  18. Paik, I.Y., Hwang, E.S. and Shin, S.B. (2009), "Reliability analysis of concrete bridges designed with material and member resisitance factors", Computers and Concrete, 6(1), 59-78 . https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2009.6.1.059
  19. Schaff, J.R. and Davidson, S.D. (1997), "Life prediction methodology for composite structures, Part I constant amplitude and two-stress level fatigue," Journal of Composite Materials, 31(2), 128-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839703100202
  20. Schueller, G.I. (2009), "Efficient Monte Carlo simulation procedures in structural uncertainty and reliability analysis-recent advances", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.1.001
  21. Song, S.F. and Lv, Z.Z. (2009), "Structural reliability sensitivity analysis method based markov chain monte carlo subset simulation", Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 45(4), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2009.04.033
  22. Wang, Z., Kang, R. and Xie, L.Y. (2010), "Reliability modeling of systems with dependent failure when the life measured by the number of loadings", Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46(3), 188-197.

피인용 문헌

  1. Risk-Cost Optimization of Buried Pipelines Using Subset Simulation vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000287
  2. Reliability analysis of underground pipelines with correlations between failure modes and random variables vol.228, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X13520145
  3. Reliability analysis of repairable k-out-n system from time response under several times stochastic shocks vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.4.559
  4. Reliability prediction for corroding natural gas pipelines vol.65, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.02.009
  5. Fuzzy-Based Robustness Assessment of Buried Pipelines vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000304
  6. Simulation of offshore aquaculture system for macro algae (seaweed) oceanic farming vol.12, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2016.1186861
  7. An iterative hybrid random-interval structural reliability analysis vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1061
  8. Application of receiver operating characteristic curve for pipeline reliability analysis vol.229, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X15571115
  9. Reliability based life cycle cost optimization for underground pipeline networks vol.43, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.04.007
  10. Time-domain multi-state markov model for engine system reliability analysis vol.3, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.16-00084
  11. Uncertainty effects of soil and structural properties on the buckling of flexible pipes shallowly buried in Winkler foundation vol.59, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.4.739
  12. Application of subset simulation in reliability estimation of underground pipelines vol.130, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.006
  13. Reliability-based preventive maintenance strategies of road junction systems pp.0265-671X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2018-0018
  14. Reliability analysis of double-layer domes with stochastic geometric imperfections vol.2, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2017.2.2.133
  15. Structural reliability analysis using response surface method with improved genetic algorithm vol.62, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.139
  16. Optimal Pipeline Maintenance Strategies in the United States: Stochastic Reliability Analysis of Gas Pipeline Network Failures vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000419