DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance of Wind-Designed Diagrid Tall Steel Buildings in Regions of Moderate Seismicity and Strong Wind

  • Received : 2012.03.14
  • Accepted : 2013.01.19
  • Published : 2013.02.25

Abstract

This study analytically evaluated the seismic performance of wind-designed diagrid tall steel buildings in regions of moderate/low seismicity and strong winds. To this end, diagrid tall steel buildings with varying wind exposure and slenderness ratio (building height-to-width ratio) conditions were designed to satisfy the wind serviceability criteria specified in the Korean Building Code and the National Building Code of Canada. A series of seismic analyses were then performed for earthquakes having 43- and 2475- year return periods utilizing the design guidelines of tall buildings. The analyses demonstrated the good seismic performance of these wind-designed diagrid tall steel buildings, which arises because significant overstrength of the diagrid system occurs in the wind design procedure. Also, analysis showed that the elastic seismic design process of diagrid tall steel buildings might be accepted based on some wind exposures and slenderness ratios.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Dankook university

References

  1. AISC. (2005), Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  2. ASCE. (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10,
  3. American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE. (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Standard ASCE/SEI 41-06, American Society of Civil Engineers.
  4. AIJ. (2004), Recommendations for Loads on Buildings and Commentary, Architectural Institute of Japan.
  5. AIK. (2009), Korean Building Code-Structural, Architectural Institute of Korea, Seoul.
  6. CTBUH. (2008), Recommendations for the Seismic Design of Highrise Buildings, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
  7. Gergely, P. (1995), "R/C Buildings in Moderate Seismic Zone: Progress and Problems in Evaluation and Design", Proceedings of Tom Paulay Symposium, San Diego.
  8. Ho, C.M. (2011), "Inelastic design of high-axially loaded concrete columns in moderate seismicity regions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 39(4), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.4.559
  9. Holmes, J.D. (2007), Wind Loading of Structures, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis Group.
  10. Kelly, D. J. and Zona, J.J. (2006), "Design Tips for Steel in Low or Moderate Seismicity Regions", Proceedings of the North American Steel Construction Conference, February 8-11, San Antonio, TX.
  11. LATBSDC. (2008), An alternative procedure for seismic analysis and design of tall buildings located in the Los Angeles region: consensus document, Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council.
  12. Lee, C. H. and Kim, S. (2007), "Elastic Seismic Design of Steel Highrise Buildings in Regions of Strong Wind and Moderate Seismicity", Int. J. of Steel Struct., 7(4), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.3.253
  13. Lew, M., Naeim, F., Hudson, M.B., and Korin, B.O. (2008), "Challenges in specifying ground motions for design of tall buildings in high seismic regions of the united states", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, Beijing, China.
  14. MIDAS Genw. (2010). General Structure Design System for Windows, MIDASIT.
  15. Moehle, J.P. (2007), "The tall buildings initiative for alternative seismic design", Los Angeles Tall Building Council, 1-8.
  16. Moon, S., Connor, J.J., and Fernandez, J.E. (2007), "Diagrid Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Characteristics and Methodolgy for Preliminary Design", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.311
  17. NBCC. (2005), User's Guide-NBC 2005 Structural Commentaries (Part 4 of Division B), National Building Code of Canada.
  18. PEER. (2010), Tall Buildings Initiative Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings, Report No. 2010/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  19. SEAOC. (1997), Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, Structural Engineers Association of California.
  20. Tremblay, R. (2002), "Achieving a Stable Inelastic Seismic Response for Multi-story Concentrically Braced Steel Frames", Eng. Journal, 40(2), 111-130.
  21. Zhang, C., Zhao, F., and Liu, Y. (2012), "Diagrid tube structures composed of straight diagonals with gradually varying angles", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21(4), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.596

Cited by

  1. Quantifying the seismic resilience of two tall buildings designed using Chinese and US Codes vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.925
  2. Potentials of elastic seismic design of twisted high-rise steel diagrid frames vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.1.121
  3. 고강도 강재를 활용한 초고층건물의 경제성 및 적합성 분석 vol.21, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2017.21.4.197
  4. Seismic performance evaluation of high-rise steel buildings dependent on wind exposures vol.11, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019835111
  5. Evaluation of Seismic Performance Factors for High-rise Steel Structures with Diagrid System vol.23, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1546-4
  6. Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation vol.39, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.065