DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Restricted Grazing Time on the Foraging Behavior and Movement of Tan Sheep Grazed on Desert Steppe

  • Chen, Yong (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Luo, Hailing (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Xueliang (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Zhenzhen (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Yuwei (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Kun (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Jiao, Lijuan (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Chang, Yanfei (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zuo, Zhaoyun (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2012.10.09
  • Accepted : 2012.12.20
  • Published : 2013.05.01

Abstract

To investigate the effect of restricted grazing time on behavior of Tan sheep on desert steppe, forty 4-months old male Tan sheep with an original body weight (BW) of $15.62{\pm}0.33$ kg were randomly allocated to 4 grazing groups which corresponded to 4 different restricted grazing time treatments of 2 h/d (G2), 4 h/d (G4), 8 h/d (G8) and 12 h/d (G12) access to pasture. The restricted grazing times had a significant impact on intake time, resting time, ruminating time, bite rate and movement. As the grazing time decreased, the proportion of time spent on intake, bite rate and grazing velocity significantly (p<0.05) increased, but resting and ruminating time clearly (p<0.05) decreased. The grazing months mainly depicted effect on intake time and grazing velocity. In conclusion, by varying their foraging behavior, Tan sheep could improve grazing efficiency to adapt well to the time-limited grazing circumstance.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, X. J., F. J. Hou, C. Matthew and X. Z. He. 2010. Stocking rate effects on metabolizable energy intake and grazing behaviour of Tan sheep in steppe grassland on the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. J. Agric. Sci. 148:709-721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000511
  2. Clapham, W. M., J. M. Fedders, K. Beeman and J. P. S. Neel. 2011. Acoustic monitoring system to quantify ingestive behavior of free-grazing cattle. Comput. Electron. Agric. 76:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.009
  3. DelCurto, T., M. Porath, C. T. Parsons and J. A. Morrison. 2005. Management strategies for sustainable beef cattle grazing on forested rangelands in the Pacific Northwest. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 58:119-127. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<119:MSFSBC>2.0.CO;2
  4. Etzenhouser, M. J., M. K. Owens, D. E. Spalinger and S. B. Murden. 1998. Foraging behavior of browsing ruminants in a heterogeneous landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 13:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007947405749
  5. Galli, J. R., C. A. Cangiano, D. H. Milone and E. A. Laca. 2011. Acoustic monitoring of short-term ingestive behavior and intake in grazing sheep. Livest. Sci. 140:32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.007
  6. Garcia, F., P. Carrere, J. F. Soussana and R. Baumont. 2005. Characterisation by fractal analysis of foraging paths of ewes grazing heterogeneous swards. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93:19-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.01.001
  7. Gekara, O. J., E. C. Prigge, W. B. Bryan, E. L. Nestor and G. Seidel. 2005. Influence of sward height, daily timing of concentrate supplementation, and restricted time for grazing on forage utilization by lactating beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1435-1444.
  8. Gibb, M. 2007. Grassland management with emphasis on grazing behaviour. Frontis 18:141-157.
  9. Ginane, C. and M. Petit. 2005. Constraining the time available to graze reinforces heifers' preference for sward of high quality despite low availability. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 94:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.010
  10. Hejcmanova, P., M. Stejskalova, V. Pavlu and M. Hejcman. 2009. Behavioural patterns of heifers under intensive and extensive continuous grazing on species-rich pasture in the Czech Republic. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 117:137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.01.003
  11. Holmes, W. 1989. The utilization of pasture. Ruminant nutrition. Recommended allowances and feed tables (Ed. R. Jarrige), INRA., Paris-London, pp. 181-197.
  12. Iason, G. R., A. R. Mantecon, D. A. Sim, J. Gonzalez, E. Foreman, F. F. Bermudez and D. A. Elston. 1999. Can grazing sheep compensate for a daily foraging time constraint? J. Anim. Ecol. 68:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00264.x
  13. Jung, J., J. Yngvesson and P. Jensen. 2002. Effects of reduced time on pasture caused by prolonged walking on behaviour and production of Mpwapwa Zebu cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 57:105-112. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00307.x
  14. Laca, E. A. 2009. Precision livestock production: tools and concepts. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38:123-132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300014
  15. Lee, S., Y. Kim, Y. Oh and W. Kwak. 2010. Effects of feeding methods of total mixed ration on behavior patterns of growing Hanwoo steers. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23:1469-1475. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.10100
  16. Lin, L., U. Dickhoefer, K. Muller and A. Susenbeth. 2011. Grazing behavior of sheep at different stocking rates in the Inner Mongolian steppe, China. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 129:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.11.002
  17. Newman, J. A., A. J. Parsons and P. D. Penning. 1994. A note on the behavioural strategies used by grazing dairy animals to alter their intake rates. Grass Forage Sci. 49:502-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02028.x
  18. Oudshoorn, F. W., T. Kristensen and E. S. Nadimi. 2008. Dairy cow defecation and urination frequency and spatial distribution in relation to time-limited grazing. Livest. Sci. 113:62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.02.021
  19. Perez-Prieto, L. A., J. L. Peyraud and R. Delagarde. 2011. Pasture intake, milk production and grazing behaviour of dairy cows grazing low-mass pastures at three daily allowances in winter. Livest. Sci. 137:151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.013
  20. PeRez-RamiRez, E., R. Delagarde and L. Delaby. 2008. Herbage intake and behavioural adaptation of grazing dairy cows by restricting time at pasture under two feeding regimes. Animal 2:1384-1392.
  21. Sanon, H. O., C. Kabore-Zoungrana and I. Ledin. 2007. Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Rumin. Res. 67:64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.09.025
  22. Shipley, L. A., D. E. Spalinger, J. E. Gross, N. T. Hobbs and B. A. Wunder. 1996. The dynamics and scaling of foraging velocity and encounter rate in mammalian herbivores. Funct. Ecol. 10:234-244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389848
  23. Taweel, H. Z., B. M. Tas, H. J. Smit, S. Tamminga and A. Elgersma. 2006. A note on eating behaviour of dairy cows at different stocking systems-diurnal rhythm and effects of ambient temperature. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 98:315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.010
  24. Umstatter, C., A. Waterhouse and J. P. Holland. 2008. An automated sensor-based method of simple behavioural classification of sheep in extensive systems. Comput. Electron. Agric. 64:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.05.004

Cited by

  1. Influence of Restricted Grazing Time Systems on Productive Performance and Fatty Acid Composition of Longissimus dorsi in Growing Lambs vol.28, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0937
  2. Dietary selection by goats and the implications for range management in the Chihuahuan Desert: a review vol.38, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ16002
  3. L.) pasture vol.72, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12228
  4. Bacterial community diversity associated with different levels of dietary nutrition in the rumen of sheep vol.101, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8144-5
  5. Herbage intake and milk yield in Comisana ewes as effect of 4 vs 7 h of grazing during late lactation vol.49, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1287-7
  6. Feed resource selection by Criollo goats browsing a tropical deciduous forest vol.58, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16388
  7. Diet selection and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid deposition in lambs as affected by restricted time at pasture vol.7, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15875-8
  8. Sheep and goat browsing a tropical deciduous forest during the rainy season: why does similar plant species consumption result in different nutrient intake? vol.59, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1071/an16512
  9. Effect of different feeding methods on rumen microbes in growing Chinese Tan sheep vol.49, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190258
  10. Behavioural Indicators of Intra- and Inter-Specific Competition: Sheep Co-Grazing with Guanaco in the Patagonian Steppe vol.11, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113333
  11. Carcass Traits, Meat Quality, and Volatile Compounds of Lamb Meat from Different Restricted Grazing Time and Indoor Supplementary Feeding Systems vol.10, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112822