DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing the Path Model defining the Relationship between Construction Worker's Personal Characteristics and Safety Behaviors

건설 근로자의 개인특성 및 안전행동 간의 경로모형 구축

  • Jin, Hyeong-Seong (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Eun (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2012.11.23
  • Accepted : 2012.12.30
  • Published : 2013.04.20

Abstract

This paper presents the path model that defines a causal relationship between the construction workers' personal characteristics and their safety behavior at job-site. The personal characteristics and the safety behaviors which should be incorporated into the theoretical model were identified and established by conducting literature survey.. The model was verified by administrating survey questionnaires to the 399 construction workers who are actively engaged in construction job-sites located in Daegu metropolitan city and Kyungpook province. The data obtained from the respondents were statistically analyzed using SPSS18 and AMOS18. It is confirmed that safety behavior is directly affected by sincerity, openness, and extroversions. In addition, it is indirectly affected by stress reaction, safety motivation, and safety knowledge as well.

본 논문은 건설현장에서 사고의 주체인 근로자의 개인적 특성과 안전행동에 대한 인과관계 규명 및 직 간접적인 영향력을 분석하는 것에 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 통해 개인적 특성 관련 변인들을 선출하고 '개인적 특성-안전행동'에 대한 이론 모형을 구안하였다. 모형 검증을 위해 대구 경북 건설현장의 근로자 399명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실행하고, SPSS 18.0과 AMOS 18.0을 활용하여 탐색적 요인분석, 신뢰도분석, 구조분석을 실시하였다. 직 간접효과를 분석하기 위해 적합도 지수와 매개효과 검증을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 개인성격 중 '성실성'과 '개방성 및 외향성'이 안전행동에 직접적인 영향을 미치면서 동시에 '스트레스반응', '안전동기', '안전지식'을 매개로 안전행동에 간접적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ye TG. Reasoning Model of the Case-Based Construction Safety Management System [master's thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Seoul National University; 1998. 111 p.
  2. Kim JW, Kim YH, Kim JH, KimJJ, editors. A Study on the Methods of Reducing the Safety Accident through Pattern Analysis of Construction Disasters. Proceedings of the 19th J of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Nov;10(2): 137-40.
  3. Lee JB, RO MR, Go SS. The Property of Building Construction Accident According to the Analysis of Building Accident Cases. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. 2004 Sep; 19(3):101-7.
  4. Jung JH. The Effect of Individual Characteristics and Organizational Characteristics on Safety-unsafety behavior [master's thesis]. [Gyeonggi (Korea)]: Catholic University; 2010. 73 p.
  5. Jang WJ. A study on the establishment of Engine Room Resource Management system based on requirements of STCW convention and ISO 9000 Family [master's thesis]. [Busam (Korea)]: Korea Maritime University; 2010. 89 p.
  6. Jung JW. The Case of Railroad Officials Accident Involvement : The Role of Personality in Predicting Safety Performance. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2000 May;13(1):41-60.
  7. Ju YJ. Occupational Distribution of Job Stress in Korea. The Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003 Dec;15(4):422-35.
  8. Chung NK, Kim H. An Empirical Study on the Safety Climate and Worker's Safe Work Behavior in Semiconductor Industry Related Work Site in Korea. The Korean Society of Safety. 2008 Apr;23(2):57-64.
  9. Seong TJ. Easy-to-understand statistical analysis using SPSS/AMOS. 1st ed. Seoul: Hakjisa, 2011. 430 p.
  10. Kim GS. AMOS 18.0 Structural Equation Modeling analysis. 1st ed. Seoul: Hannarae-Academy; 2010. 663 p.
  11. Suh HY. The Effect of Personality Characteristics and Job Characteristics on Safety-unsafety behavior[master's thesis]. [Gyeonggi (Korea)]: Catholic University; 2010. 56 p.
  12. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Lee HS, KIM SJ, Jeon SH, translators. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2010. 477 p.
  13. Hong SH. The Criteria for Selecting Appropriate Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Their Rationales. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2000 Jan;19(1): 66-71.
  14. Moon SB. with AMOS17.0 = Basic concepts and applications of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hakjisa, 2009. 724 p.
  15. An SJ, Song SH. Integrated Safety Risk Management System on Construction Site Using System Approach. Korea Safety Management & Science. 2010 Sep;12(3):1-11.
  16. Lee HD. Analysis of construction workers through a survey study on improving safety awareness [master's thesis]. [Daegu (Korea)]: Yeungnam University; 2011. 78 p.
  17. Han TY. Job stress and Psychosocial Stress level of Dental technicians [master's thesis]. [Gyeonggi (Korea)]: Dankook University; 2009. 80 p.
  18. KIM EJ. A Study on the Safety Education Method in Consideration of Construction Worker's Individual Characteristics. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2011 Dec;13(4):305-14.
  19. Han JW. Linking organizational safety culture and individual safety attitude and motivation to pilot safety behavior : a multi-level analysis of the Republic of Korea Air Force air units and pilots [master's thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Yonsei University; 2009. 43 p.
  20. Kim KS, Park YS. The Effects of Safety Climate on Safety Behavior and Accidents. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2002 May;15(1):19-39.
  21. Moon GR. (A) study of safety bahavior dimension [master's thesis]. [Gyeonggi (Korea)]: Catholic University; 2009. 60 p.
  22. Lee WY. The Interacting Effects of Cognitive Failure, Consciousness and Job Stress on Safety Behavior and Accidents. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2006 Aug;19(3):475-97.
  23. Lee HC, Yeo SK, Go SS. A Study on the Improving Safety Management by analyzing Safety Consciousness of Construction Labors. The Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2009 Jun;9(3):51-8. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2009.9.3.051
  24. Yi KJ. Construction Worker's Occupational Risk of On-Site Travelling Activities. The Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2005 Jun;6(3):120-7.
  25. Kim JT. The Study for Factors Influencing Construction Worker's Safety Consciousness [master's thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Soongsil University; 2010. 69 p.
  26. Lee JH, Moon KS, O SJ. The Effects of Stress Response on Safety Behavior : Moderating Effect of Safety Climate. Korea Safety Management & Science. 2010 Dec;12(4):31-9.
  27. An GY, Park NG, Jeon YS. The relationship among safety motivation, antecedents and employee safety participation in SME. The Korean Association of Small Business Studies. 2003 Dec;25(4):257-80.
  28. Son YS. The Relationships among Job Stressors, Stress Responses, and Industrial Accident and Illness [dissertation]. [Kangwon (Korea)]: Sangji University; 2008. 160 p.
  29. Lee SY. Effect of Job Stress on Industrial Accidents- Centrally on the Construction and Manufacturing Workers [master's thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Dongguk University; 2011. 59 p.
  30. Jeon JM. A study on the industry safety awareness of construction workers [master's thesis]. [Daegu (Korea)]: Yeungnam University; 2002. 58 p.
  31. Woo JM. (The) development of job stress model and management program based on cognitive-behavioral intervention [dissertation]. [Chungbuk (Korea)]: Chungbuk National University; 2005. 209 p.
  32. Choi SM, Kang TY, Woo JM. Development and Validation of a Modified form of the Stress Response Inventory for Workers. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2006 Nov;45(6):541-53.
  33. Go KB, Park JG, Kim CH. Development of the Stress Response Inventory. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2000 Jul;39(4):707-19.
  34. Oliver A, Alistar C, Sue C. The effects of organizational and individual factor on occupational accidents. Journal of occupational and organization psycholog. 2002 Dec;75(4):473-88. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119691
  35. Pervin LA, John OP. Personality: Theory and Research 7th ed. New York: John Wiley. 1997. 578 p.
  36. Fernandez Seara JL. Psychology of the automobile driver: Personality factors of drivers with multiple accidents., Revista De Psicologia Generally Aplicada. 1978 Apr;33(151):217-28.
  37. Shin DP. The structural analysis between safety factors having an effect on the construction worker's behavior [master's thesis]. [Daegu (Korea)]: Kyungpook University; 2012. 52 p.
  38. Lajunen T. Personality and accident liability: Are extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism related to traffic and occupational fatalities, Personality and Individual Differences. 2001 Dec;31(8):1365-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00230-0
  39. Dester WS, Blockley DI. Safety-behavior and culture in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 1995 Jan;2(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021000
  40. Grinffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 2000 Jan;5(3):347-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  41. Cellar DF, Nelson ZC, Yorke CM Bauer C. The Five-Factor Model and Safety in the Workplace: Investigating the Relationships Between Personality and Accident Involvement. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the community. 2001 Jul;22(1):43-52.
  42. Goldberg LR. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and social psychology. 1981 Jan;2(1):141-65.
  43. Wallace JC. Workplace Safety Performance: Conscientiousness, Cognitive Failure, and Their Interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2003 Oct;8(4):316-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.316
  44. Norman WT. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1963 Jun;66(6):574-83.
  45. An YS. Study on the Analtsis of Present Situation and Improvement Direction of Construction Safety Empirical Education. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2008 Aug;8(4):95-103. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2008.8.4.095

Cited by

  1. Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling vol.77, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.010
  2. A Qualitative Study on Safety Rule Violation Motives at Manufacturing Plants vol.31, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.2.133
  3. Study on the Structural Relation between the Level of Fatigue and Stress of Construction Workers and Disaster Risks vol.16, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2014.16.3.35