DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimizing the Imaging Protocol for Ex Vivo Coronary Artery Wall Using High-Resolution MRI: An Experimental Study on Porcine and Human

  • Yang, Jiong (Department of Medical, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces) ;
  • Li, Tao (Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces) ;
  • Cui, Xiaoming (Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces) ;
  • Zhou, Weihua (Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces) ;
  • Li, Xin (Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces) ;
  • Zhang, Xinwu (Department of Pathology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces)
  • Received : 2012.09.15
  • Accepted : 2013.03.24
  • Published : 2013.07.01

Abstract

Objective: To optimize the MR imaging protocol for coronary arterial wall depiction in vitro and characterize the coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Materials and Methods: MRI examination was prospectively performed in ten porcine hearts in order to optimize the MR imaging protocol. Various surface coils were used for coronary arterial wall imaging with the same parameters. Then, the image parameters were further optimized for high-resolution coronary wall imaging. The signal-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) of images were measured. Finally, 8 human cadaver hearts with coronary atherosclerotic plaques were prospectively performed with MRI examination using optimized protocol in order to characterize the coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Results: The SNR and CNR of MR image with temporomandibular coil were the highest of various surface coils. High-resolution and high SNR and CNR for ex vivo coronary artery wall depiction can be achieved using temporomandibular coil with 512 ${\times}$ 512 in matrix. Compared with histopathology, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for identifying advanced plaques were: type IV-V (lipid, necrosis, fibrosis), 94% and 95%; type VI (hemorrhage), 100% and 98%; type VII (calcification), 91% and 100%; and type VIII (fibrosis without lipid core), 100% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: Temporomandibular coil appears to be dramatically superior to eight-channel head coil and knee coil for ex vivo coronary artery wall imaging, providing higher spatial resolution and improved the SNR. Ex vivo high-resolution MRI has capability to distinguish human coronary atherosclerotic plaque compositions and accurately classify advanced plaques.

Keywords

References

  1. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995;92:657-671 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.3.657
  2. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(8 Suppl):C13-C18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065
  3. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). N Engl J Med 1992;326:242-250 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199201233260406
  4. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2). N Engl J Med 1992;326:310-318 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199201303260506
  5. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262-1275 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.20.5.1262
  6. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Flohr T, Huber A, Scheidler J, Fayad ZA, et al. Optimization of ex vivo CT- and MR- imaging of atherosclerotic vessel wall changes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004;20:327-334 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CAIM.0000041936.21786.ac
  7. Stary HC, Blankenhorn DH, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Richardson M, et al. A definition of the intima of human arteries and of its atherosclerosis-prone regions. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1992;85:391-405 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.85.1.391
  8. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 2001;104:2051-2056 https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.097839
  9. Yuan C, Kerwin WS, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Zhang S, Cai J, et al. Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:62-67 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10030
  10. Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT, Goldman M, Aguinaldo JG, Badimon JJ, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 2000;101:2503-2509 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.21.2503
  11. Gweon HM, Kim SJ, Lee SM, Hong YJ, Kim TH. 3D wholeheart coronary MR angiography at 1.5T in healthy volunteers: comparison between unenhanced SSFP and Gd-enhanced FLASH sequences. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:679-685 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.679
  12. Kim WY, Astrup AS, Stuber M, Tarnow L, Falk E, Botnar RM, et al. Subclinical coronary and aortic atherosclerosis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in type 1 diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy. Circulation 2007;115:228-235
  13. Macedo R, Chen S, Lai S, Shea S, Malayeri AA, Szklo M, et al. MRI detects increased coronary wall thickness in asymptomatic individuals: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1108-1115 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21511
  14. Gerretsen S, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Dijkstra J, Reiber JH, van der Geest RJ, et al. Detection of coronary plaques using MR coronary vessel wall imaging: validation of findings with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2013;23:115-124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2576-1
  15. Serfaty JM, Chaabane L, Tabib A, Chevallier JM, Briguet A, Douek PC. Atherosclerotic plaques: classification and characterization with T2-weighted high-spatial-resolution MR imaging-- an in vitro study. Radiology 2001;219:403-410 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma15403
  16. Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Obrien KD. High-Resolution magnetic resonance imaging of normal and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries ex vivo: discrimination of plaque tissue components. J Investig Med 2001;49:491-499 https://doi.org/10.2310/6650.2001.33625
  17. Li T, Li X, Zhao X, Zhou W, Cai Z, Yang L, et al. Classification of human coronary atherosclerotic plaques using ex vivo high-resolution multicontrast-weighted MRI compared with histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:1069-1075 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6496
  18. Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002;106:1368-1373 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028591.44554.F9
  19. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, et al. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1994;89:2462-2478 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2462
  20. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;92:1355-1374 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.5.1355
  21. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Muders M, Babaryka G, Scheidler J, Flohr T, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 2004;174:243-252 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.01.041
  22. Koops A, Ittrich H, Petri S, Priest A, Stork A, Lockemann U, et al. Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex-vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 2007;17:279-286 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0265-7
  23. Cury RC, Houser SL, Furie KL, Stone JR, Ogilvy CS, Sherwood JB, et al. Vulnerable plaque detection by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2006;41:112-115 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000186419.55504.30