DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

신호영향권 하 도로공사구간에서의 용량산정모형 개발과 실증

Capacity Estimation Models for Work-zones Under Traffic Signal Influence and the Empirical Validation

  • 신치현 (경기대학교 도시.교통공학과)
  • Shin, Chi-Hyun (Department of Urban & Transportation Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • 투고 : 2012.11.19
  • 심사 : 2013.02.11
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28

초록

본 고는 신호교차로 영향권에서 수행되는 도로점용공사가 유발하는 신호교차로의 정지선에서의 유출 가능량, 다시 말해 포화교통류율의 변화를 산정하여 해당 접근 차로군의 용량을 계산할 수 있는 해석적 모형의 개발에 초점을 맞추고 있다. 해석적 모형이 가진 설명력의 간결함과 산정 정확도를 제고하기 위하여 선행연구의 모형논리를 크게 바꾸고 상당한 수정을 가하였다. 또 모형의 검증을 위해서 많은 노력이 보태졌는데, 다양한 미시 모의실험 결과와의 비교 뿐만 아니라 실제 공사현장에서 수집된 많은 자료를 바탕으로 하는 현장 대표 값들과의 비교 등이 수행되었다. 포화교통류율은 도로점용공사의 위치, 정지선과 공사구간과 이격거리, 개방 및 폐쇄 차로 수, 유효녹색시간 등에 상당히 민감하게 변화한다는 것이 확인되었으며, 공사현장의 특성을 구성하는 그와 같은 기하구조 및 신호운영관련 조건 등을 변수로 하는 제안 모형들은 아주 적은 오차 범위 내에서 성공적으로 포화교통류율을 산정해 낼 수 있음을 보여 주었다.

This paper focuses on the development of analytical models for estimating the changes in saturation flow rates (SFR) at the stop-lines of a signalized intersection due to the existence of nearby work-zones, and thereby calculating the prevailing capacity values for specific lane groups. Major changes were incorporated in the logics of previous models and significant revisions have been made to secure the accuracy and simplicity. Furthermore, much attention was paid to model validation by making comparisons to both extensive simulation results and empirical data from various sites. It was found that SFRs are highly sensitive to the location of work-zones, the distance to each work-zone from the stop-line of a concerned approach, the number of lanes open and closed, and the effective green time. Using such geometric and operating conditions that constitute work-zone environment, the proposed models successfully estimated SFR values with a miniscule margin of error.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Elefteriadou L. et al. (2008), Impact of Lane Closures on Roadway Capacity : Project Report, Florida Department of Transportation.
  2. Eo H., Shin C. (2010), Development of SFR Estimation Models Considering Workzones in the Vicinity of Signalized Intersections, J. Korean Soc. Transp., Vol.28, No.6, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.109-120.
  3. Jung H., Lee C. (2006), Capacity Drop Due to Various Incidents on Freeways, The 53rd Conference of Korean Society of Transportation, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.401-410.
  4. Kim D., Lee S. (1998), Traffic Characteristics on Lane Drop Areas around Highway Work Zones, J. Korean Soc. Civil Eng., Vol.18, No. III-4, KSCE, pp.445-462.
  5. Kim T., Lovell D., Paracha J. (2001), A New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones, TRB Annual Meeting.
  6. Ko J. (2005), The Study on Permission and Management System Improvement of Traffic Control System on Road Works, Master Thesis, Graduate School of Urban Science, University of Seoul.
  7. Krammes R. A., Lopez G. O. (1994), Updated Capacity Values for Short-term Freeway Work Zone Lane Closures, TRR 1442, TRB Washington D.C.
  8. KST (2012), Highway Capacities under Special Situations including Roundabouts, Workzones and Inclement Weather Conditions: Final Draft Report, Korea Society of Transportation.
  9. May A. (1990), Traffic Flow Fundamentals, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  10. Memmott J. L., Dudek C. L. (1984), Queue and User Cost Evaluation of Work Zones (QUEWZ), TRR 979, TRB Washington D.C.
  11. MOCT (2001), Korean Highway Capacity Manual, Ministry of Construction and Transportation.
  12. Oh J., Ko D. (1998), Analysis of Traffic Flow on the Lane Closure due to Road Construction, The 34th Conference of Korean Society of Transportation, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.116-125.
  13. Park J. N., Oh Y. T. (2007), The Method to Estimate the Length of Transition Area at the Construction Area in the Freeway, The 55th Conference of Korean Society of Transportation, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.393-401.
  14. Praveen K. E. (2007), Estimation of Traffic Mobility Impacts at Work Zones : State of The Practice, TRB Annual Meeting.
  15. Rahim F. B. et al. (2003), Evaluation of Construction Work Zone Operational Issue : Capacity, Queue, and Delay, Illinois Transportation Research Center.
  16. TRB (2000), Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, TRB Washington D.C.
  17. TRB (2010), Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, TRB Washington D.C.

피인용 문헌

  1. 공사구간이 있는 신호교차로의 지체산정을 위한 새로운 접근 vol.38, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/ksce.2018.38.2.0269