DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전사적자원관리(ERP) 시스템의 조직 내 확산에 대한 저항요인 분석

An Analytical Study on the Influence of Resistance Factors in Adoption and Diffusion of Innovation as for Introducing ERP Systems into Universities

  • 김현정 (연세대학교 산학협력단) ;
  • 이영희 (한국방송통신전파진흥원) ;
  • 김문선 (중소기업기술정보진흥원 통계분석팀)
  • Kim, Hyeon-Jeong (Yonsei University, Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hee (Korea Communications Agency) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Sun (TIPA(Korea Technology and Information Promotion Agency), Statistical Analysis Team)
  • 투고 : 2012.11.14
  • 심사 : 2013.01.04
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28

초록

본 논문은 ERP 효과를 조직성과로 전환하기 위해 혁신과정에서 발생하는 조직구성원들의 저항을 체계적으로 통제, 관리하는데 연구초점을 두고, 의무적 수용 상황에서 ERP 시스템의 조직 내 확산에서의 저항요인을 조사하고 검증하였다. 169개의 대학사례를 분석한 결과 ERP 시스템 이용에 대한 심리적 태도(두려움, 의심 등)가 저항행동 의도에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것을 밝혀냈다. 저항의 선행변수 중 업무처리의 상대적 이점, 시스템의 상대적 이점, 서비스 지원은 저항행동 의도에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났으나, 저항에 대한 심리적 태도에 부분적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 저항을 심리적 측면과 행동적 측면으로 구분하여 실증하였다는 점에서 기존 연구와 차별되며, 혁신의 수용과 확산 과정에서 나타날 수 있는 부정적 측면의 저항을 체계적으로 연구, 분석하였다는데 의의가 있다.

This paper focuses on the systematic approach to handle possible resistance by the members of an organization which adopts ERP system. We also analyze various factors that affect the members' receptivity to the new system. The analytic result from the data of 169 universities shows that emotional factors such as fear and doubt play a significant role, while other factors such as relative advantages of efficiency, relative advantages of system and technology support does not. This research demonstrates both the psychological and behavioral aspects of resistance to technology, and then provides a new perspective on the adoption and diffusion of technological innovation in an organization by systematically analyzing the possible negative consequences while the majority of existing research emphasizes on the rosy prospects of the innovation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R., "The Partial Least Squares(PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration," Technology Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 285-309, 1995.
  2. Bradford, M., "The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning : An Innovation Diffusion Approach," Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, 2001.
  3. Brakeley, H., "What makes ERP effective?," Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 17, p. 120, 1999.
  4. Brod, C., "Managing Technostress : Optimizing the use of computer technology," Personnel Journal, Vol. 61, pp. 753-757, 1982.
  5. Byeon, J. S., Management innovation utilizing ERP, Litebook-dotcom, 2003.
  6. Chin, W. W., "Frequently Asked Questions- Partial Least Squares and PLS-Graph," 2000-[cited 2006. 7. 21], Available : http://discnt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfaq.htm.
  7. Cho, S. D., "Study on the technology product of the resistance and the spread of innovation within the organization-focusing on ERP Systems," Ph.D. dissertation, Yonsei University, 1999.
  8. Coetsee, L. D., "A Practical Model for the Management of Resistance to Change : An Analysis of Political Resistance in South Africa," International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1815-1858, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699308524874
  9. Cottleer, M. J., "Operational Performance Following ERP Implementation," Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2001.
  10. Davenport, T., "Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, pp. 121-131, 1998.
  11. Dickson, G. W. and Simmons, J. K., "The Behavioral Side of MIS," Business Horizons, pp. 59-71, August, 1970.
  12. Gilroy, F. D. and Desai, H. B., "Computer Anxiety : Sex, Race and Age," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 25, pp. 711-719, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80084-0
  13. Kettinger, W. J. and Lee, C. C., "Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Service Function," Decision Science, Vol. 25, No. 5/6, pp. 737-766, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01868.x
  14. Kim, M. S., Kim, H. J., Kim, M. O., and Kim, H. J., "A Study on the User Resistance to IPTV," The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2010.
  15. Kim, S. H., "The Empirical Study on the diffusion of ERP System," Korean Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 475-501, 2001.
  16. Kim, S. W., "A Empirical Study on the User Resistance to Information Systems Innovation", Journal of Korea Business Administration, Vol. 20, pp. 317-342, 1999.
  17. Kim, M. S., "Managing Resistance and Change:Paradox in IS Implementation", Information Systems Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 25-45, 2004.
  18. Korea Education and Research Information Service, A Study on the development of ERP Introduction adequacy model at University and the Planning on ERP System's development and dissemination, KERIS Report CR 2007-13.
  19. Krovi, R., "Identifying the Cause of Resistance to IS Implementation : A Change Theory Perspective," Information and Management, Vol.25, pp. 327-335, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(93)90082-5
  20. Kwon, J. S., "The Relationship among the Organizational Justice, Resistance to Innovation and Defensive Behavior of Employees," Personnel Management Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 425-452, 2001.
  21. Lee, D. G., ERP strategy and practice, Daecheong, 1999.
  22. Lee, S. H., "The study on the innovation resistance of consumers in the adoption process of new product," Ph.D. dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, 1993.
  23. Lee, S. Y., Analysis of the Influencing Factors for ERP Implementation : Cases of Industrial and Educational University, KAIST Master's thesis, 2006.
  24. Lee, Y. H., Park, D. S., and Lee, J. W., "A Study on the Role of Communication in Information Systems Development," Entrue Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 89-103, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2009.89.94
  25. Marakas, G. M. and Homik, S., "Passive Resistance Misuse : Overt Support and Convert Recalcitrancein IS Implementation," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 208-219, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1996.26
  26. Ram, S., "A Model of Innovation Resistance," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, pp. 208-212, 1987.
  27. Ram, S. and Jung, H. S., "Forced Adoption of Innovation in Organizations : Consequences and Implications," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8, pp. 117-126, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(91)90005-J
  28. Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of Innovation," 3rd ed., The Free Press, New York, 1983.
  29. Sanders, G. L. and Courtney, J. F., "A field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 77-92, 1985. https://doi.org/10.2307/249275
  30. Song, S. G. and Baeg, J. U., "A Study on Factors Affecting the Relationship between the Diffusion of ERP Systems and Performance", Industrial Economic Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 543-566, 2004.
  31. Strassman, J. K., "Information Integration for Supply Chain Management : An Empirical Investigation of ERP Systems in Manufacturing," Ph.D. dissertation, The University of North Carolina, 2001.
  32. Yoo, Y. J. and Alavi, M., "Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 371-390, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922
  33. Yoon, H. S., Innovation of University and Six Sigma, 2009, http://www.sixsigma.or.kr.
  34. Zaltman, G. and Wallendorf, M., "Consumer Behavior : Basic findings and Management Implications," New York : John wiley & Son, 1983.
  35. Zmud, R. W., "Individual Difference and MIS Success : A Review of the Empirical Literature," Management Science, Vol. 25, pp. 966-979, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966