DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Information Mediating in Social Network Sites : A Simulation Study

소셜 네트워크 사이트의 정보 매개하기 : 시뮬레이션 연구

  • Rho, Sangkyu (Graduate School of Business Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Taekyung (College of Business Administration Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jinsoo (Graduate School of Business Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2012.11.12
  • Accepted : 2012.11.27
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Information sharing behavior in the Internet has raised much interest. Recently, social network sites provide a new information sharing channel for the users who want to connect with others based on common social background or tastes. Especially, we focus that a social network site becomes one of major routes for information sharing about socially influential issues. Therefore, studying how information is diffused via a social network site may give theoretically, practically significant implication. Based on the assertion, we investigated user's behavior to mediate other user's information messages. We define information mediating behavior as concurrent actions of filtering and distributing behavior of the digital content that is originated from one of the connected users. In this study, we intended to understand the effects of information mediating behavior, and tried to understand characteristics of re-mediating of previously mediated information. Using an agent-based simulation model, we found that information mediating behavior increased the extent of information diffusion significantly. In addition, even a small degree of mediating probability could boost up the level of information diffusion in the case of a re-mediating condition. We believe that those findings provide remarkable insight of research and business application on both of information sharing and diffusion in a social network site.

개인의 관심사나 사회적 문제를 토론하는 장으로 소셜 네트워크 사이트가 최근 활발하게 쓰인다. 기업에 대한 소식들이 소셜 네트워크 사이트의 사용자들 사이에서 회자되기는 마찬가지다. 이처럼 소셜 네트워크 사이트는 정보가 확산되는 주요 통로로 사용되나, 어떻게 그것이 가능한지에 대한 학문적 이해는 부족한 형편이다. 소셜 네트워크 사이트에서 정보가 전파될 때, 개인과 개인 간의 담화, 혹은 한 개인이 자신의 지인들에게 정보를 알려주는 방법에 따른다. 그런데 이와 같은 개인적 노력으로도 사회적 파장을 불러올 만큼 소셜 네트워크 서비스의 정보 확산은 대단하다. 본 논문은 '정보 매개하기'를 중심으로 어떻게 개인 수준의 정보 전파가 네트워크 수준의 정보 확산을 가져오는지를 이해하려 한다. 특히 정보 매개하기에 있어서 '정보 걸러내기의 효과'의 역할에 관심을 집중했다. 시뮬레이션의 결과를 통해, 정보 매개하기 활동이 정보 전파를 활성화시키며, 나아가 정보 확산에 기여하는 것으로 드러났다. 또한 정보 걸러내기 효과가 있을 때, 매우 작은 확률로 정보 매개하기 활동이 있다고 해도, 그 영향력은 아주 크다는 점을 보였다. 즉, 이미 정보 전파가 있었다는 사실이 다른 사람들의 관심을 끌 수 있다면 비록 소수만이 정보 전파 활동을 하더라도 정보는 아주 빨리 퍼져나갈 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acquisti, A. and Gross, R., "Imagined Communities : Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook," in Privacy Enhancing Technologies, G. Danezis and P. Golle (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 36-58, 2006.
  2. Asvanund, A., Clay, K., Krishnan, R., and Smith, M. D., "An Empirical Analysis of Netwrok Externalities in Peer-to-Peer Music-Sharing Networks," Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 155-174, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0020
  3. Barabási, A. L., Linked : The New Science of Networks, Perseus Pub, MA, 2002.
  4. Barabási, A. L. and Albert, R., "Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks," Science, Vol. 286, No. 5439, pp. 509-512, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  5. Barabasi, A. L. and Oltvai, Z. N., "Network Biology : Understanding the Cell's Functional Organization," Nat Rev Genet, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 101-113, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272
  6. Bennett, S., "Just How Big Is Twitter in 2012?" Mediabistro, http://www.mediabis tro.com/alltwitter/twitter-statistics-201 2_b18914, 2012.
  7. Berger, J. and Schwartz, E. M., "What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth?," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 869-880, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.5.869
  8. Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B., "Social Network Sites : Definition, History, and Scholarship," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 210- 230, 2007.
  9. Chang, D., "Korean Politics on Twitter : Networks of Politicians and Voters," Journal of Communication Research(언론 정보연구), Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 80-107, 2011.
  10. Chang, D. and Ghim, G., "The Structure and Dynamics of the Korean Twitter Network," Journal of Communication Research(언론정보연구), Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 59-86, 2011.
  11. Cheung, C. M. K. and Lee, M. K. O., "What Drives Comsumers to Spread Electronic Word of Mouth in Online Consumer- Option Platforms," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 218-225, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015
  12. Chevalier, J. A. and Mayzlin, D., "The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales : Online Book Reviews," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol, 43. No. 3, pp. 345-354, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  13. Devenow, A. and Welch, I., "Rational Herding in Financial Economics," European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 3-5, pp. 603-615, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00073-9
  14. Duan, W., Gu, B., and Whinston, A. B., "Informational Cascades and Software Adoption on the Internet : An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 23-48, 2009.
  15. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C., "The Benefits of Facebook "Friends : Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1143-1168, 2007.
  16. Fogel, J. and Nehmad, E., "Internet Social Network Communities : Risk Taking, Trust, and Privacy Concerns," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 153- 160, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006
  17. Garg, R., Smith, M. D., and Telang, R., "Measuring Information Diffusion in an Online Community," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 11-37, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280202
  18. Hargittai, E., "Whose Space? Differences among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites," Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 276-297, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
  19. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., and Chowdury, A., "Twitter Power : Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 11, pp. 2169-2188, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21149
  20. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B., "Why We Twitter : Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities," in Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, San Jose, California, pp. 56-65, 2007.
  21. Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., and Sarvary, M., "Network Effects and Personal Influences : The Diffusion of an Online Social Network," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 425-443, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.425
  22. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S., "What Is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?," in Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, New York, pp. 591-600, 2010.
  23. Langville, A. N. and Meyer, C. D., Google's Pagerank and Beyond : The Science of Search Engine Rankings, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2006.
  24. Liu, D. and Chen, X., "Rumor Propagation in Online Social Networks Like Twitter - a Simulation Study," in Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security (MINES), Nanjing, pp. 278-282, 2011.
  25. Marett, K. and Joshi, K. D., "The Decision to Share Information and Rumors : Examining the Roleof Motivation in an Online Discussion Forum," Communications of the AIS, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 48-68, 2009.
  26. McLure-Wasko, M. and Faraj, S., "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 35-57, 2005.
  27. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P., and Bhattacharjee, B., "Measurement and Analysis of Online Social Networks," in Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, San Diego, California, pp. 29-42, 2007.
  28. Oh, O., Kwon, K. H., and Rao, H. R., "An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events : Rumor Theory and Twitter During the Haiti Earthquake 2010," in ICIS 2010 Paper 231, 2010.
  29. Pijpers, G., Information Overload : A System for Better Managing Everyday Data, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2010.
  30. Romero, D., Galuba, W., Asur, S., and Huberman, B., "Influence and Passivity in Social Media, in Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery," in Databases, D. Gunopulos, T. Hofmann, D. Malerba, and M. Vazirgiannis (Eds), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 18-33, 2011.
  31. Rosnow, R. L., "Inside Rumor : A Personal Journey," American Psychologist, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 484-496, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.484
  32. Rosnow, R. L. and Foster, E. K., "Rumor and Gossip Research," APA Online Psychological Science Agenda, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1-4, 2005.
  33. SocialBakers, "Facebook Statistics by Country," http://www.socialbakers.com/fac ebook-statistics, 2012.
  34. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., and Lampe, C., "Social Capital, Self-Esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites : A Longitudinal Analysis," Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 434-445, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
  35. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., and Chi, E. H. "Want to Be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network," in 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Palo Alto, pp. 177-184. 2010.
  36. Taylor, W. A., "Computer-Mediated Knowledge Sharing and Individual User Differences : An Exploratory Study," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 52-64, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000484
  37. Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., and Williams, C. B., "Web 2.0 and Politics : The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 669-688, 2010.
  38. Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H., "Collective Dynamics of 'Small-World' Networks, Nature, Vol. 393, No. 4, pp. 440-442, 1988.
  39. Wiertz, C. and Ruyter, K. D., "Beyond the Call of Duty : Why Customers Contribute to Firm-Hosted Commercial Online Community," Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 347-376, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076003
  40. Wilensky, U., Netlogo, http://ccl.northwe stern.edu/netlogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Evanston, 1999.
  41. Xu, Y., Kim, H., and Kankanhalli, A., "Task and Social Information Seeking : Whom Do We Prefer and Whom Do We Approach?," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol, 27. No. 3, pp. 211-240, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270308

Cited by

  1. The Information Filtering of Gene Network for Chronic Diseases: Social Network Perspective vol.11, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/736569
  2. Importances of Smart Phone Attributes by Pursuit Benefits vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2015.20.1.099