Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inhibitory effect on Streptococcus mutans and mechanical properties of the chitosan containing composite resin

  • Kim, Ji-Sun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science)
  • Received : 2012.12.03
  • Accepted : 2013.01.12
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the antibacterial effect and mechanical properties of composite resins ($L_{CR}$, $M_{CR}$, $H_{CR}$) incorporating chitosan with three different molecular weights (L, Low; M, Medium; H, High). Materials and Methods: Streptococcus (S). mutans 100 mL and each chitosan powder were inoculated in sterilized 10 mL Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) solution, and was centrifuged for 12 hr. Absorbance of the supernatent was measured at $OD_{660}$ to estimate the antibacterial activities of chitosan. After S. mutans was inoculated in the disc shaped chitosan-containing composite resins, the disc was cleansed with BHI and diluted with serial dilution method. S. mutans was spread on Mitis-salivarius bacitracin agar. After then, colony forming unit (CFU) was measured to verify the inhibitory effect on S. mutans biofilm. To ascertain the effect on the mechanical properties of composite resin, 3-point bending and Vickers hardness tests were done after 1 and 3 wk water storage, respectively. Using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe test, statistical analysis was done with 95% significance level. Results: All chitosan powder showed inhibition effect against S. mutans. CFU number in chitosan-containing composite resins was smaller than that of control resin without chitosan. The chitosan containing composite resins did not show any significant difference in flexural strength and Vickers hardness in comparison with the control resin. However, the composite resin, $M_{CR}$ showed a slightly decreased flexural strength and the maximum load than those of control and the other composite resins $H_{CR}$ and $L_{CR}$. Conclusions: $L_{CR}$ and $H_{CR}$ would be recommended as a feasible antibacterial restorative due to its antibacterial nature and mechanical properties.

Keywords

References

  1. Kato K, Fukui K, Nakagaki H, Sato T, Takahashi N. Density profiles of total bacteria and S. mutans within dental plaque treated with stannous fluoride gel. International Congress Series 2005;1284:185-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.07.010
  2. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003;19:449-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00102-1
  3. Addy M, Thaw M. In vitro studies into the release of chlorhexidine acetate, prednisolone sodium phosphate, and prednisolone alcohol from cold cure denture base acrylic. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:145-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160207
  4. Wilson SJ, Wilson HJ. The release of chlorhexidine from modified dental acrylic resin. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20:311-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01613.x
  5. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Kerper S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10:373-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00133.x
  6. Imazato S, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Antibacterial activity of MDPB polymer incorporated in dental resin. J Dent 1995;23:177-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)93576-N
  7. Uragami T, Yamamoto S, Miyata T. Dehydration from alcohols by polyion complex cross-linked chitosan composite membranes during evapomeation. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:137-144. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm025642o
  8. Ikinci G, Senel S, Akincibay H, Kas S, Ercis S, Wilson CG, Hincal AA. Effect of chitosan on a periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Int J Pharm 2002;235:121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00974-7
  9. Chung YC, Wang HL, Chen YM, Li SL. Effect of abiotic factors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan against waterborne pathogens. Bioresour Technol 2003;88:179-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00002-6
  10. Helander IM, Nurmiaho-Lassila EL, Ahvenainen R, Rhoades J, Roller S. Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 2001;71:235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00609-2
  11. Rabea EI, Badawy ME, Stevens CV, Smagghe G, Steurbaut W. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:1457-1465. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034130m
  12. Chung YC, Su YP, Chen CC, Jia G, Wang HL, Wu JC, Lin JG. Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004;25:932-936.
  13. Decker EM, von Ohle C, Weiger R, Wiech I, Brecx M. A synergistic chlorhexidine/chitosan combination for improved antiplaque strategies. J Periodontal Res 2005;40: 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00817.x
  14. Choi BK, Kim KY, Yoo YJ, Oh SJ, Choi JH, Kim CY. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a chitooligosaccharide mixture against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Streptococcus mutans. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;18:553-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00434-4
  15. Fujiwara M, Hayashi Y, Ohara N. Inhibitory effect of water-soluble chitosan on growth of Streptococcus mutans. New Microbiol 2004;27:83-86.
  16. Tarsi R, Muzzarelli RA, Guzmán CA, Pruzzo C. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans adsorption to hydroxyapatite by low-molecular-weight chitosans. J Dent Res 1997;76: 665-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760020701
  17. Tarsi R, Corbin B, Pruzzo C, Muzzarelli RA. Effect of low-molecular-weight chitosans on the adhesive properties of oral streptococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1998;13:217-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1998.tb00699.x
  18. Miyazaki S, Nakayama A, Oda M, Takada M, Attwood D. Chitosan and sodium alginate based bioadhesive tablets for intraoral drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull 1994;17:745-747. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.17.745
  19. Hernandez-Lauzardo AN, Bautista-Banos S, Velazquezdel Valle MG, Mendez-Montealvo MG, Sanchez-Rivera MM, Bello-Perez LA. Antifungal effects of chitosan with different molecular weights on in vitro development of Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.:Fr.) Vuill. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008;73:541-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.12.020
  20. Madihally SV, Matthew HW. Porous chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 1999;20:1133-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00011-3
  21. Bae K, Jun EJ, Lee SM, Paik DI, Kim JB. Effect of watersoluble reduced chitosan on Streptococcus mutans, plaque regrowth and biofilm vitality. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:102-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0038-3
  22. Kas HS. Chitosan: properties, preparations and application to microparticulate systems. J Microencapsul 1997;14:689-711. https://doi.org/10.3109/02652049709006820
  23. Sano H, Matsukubo T, Shibasaki K, Itoi H, Takaesu Y. Inhibition of adsorption of oral streptococci to saliva treated hydroxyapatite by chitin derivatives. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1991;32:9-17.
  24. Tanzer JM. Microbiology of dental caries. In Contemporary oral microbiology and immunology. edited by Slots J and Taubman M. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992. p377-424.
  25. Slotz J, Gibbons RJ. Attachment of Bacteroides melaninogenicus subsp. asaccharolyticus to oral surfaces and its possible role in colonization of the mouth and of periodontal pockets. Infect Immun 1978;19:254-264.
  26. Wise MD, Dykema RW. The plaque-retaining capacity of four dental materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80108-9
  27. Frank RM, Steuer P. Transmission electron microscopy of plaque accumulations in denture stomatitis. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90079-4
  28. Skjörland KK. Plaque accumulation on different dental filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81:538-542.
  29. Skjorland KK, Sonju T. Effect of sucrose rinses on bacterial colonization on amalgam and composite. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:193-196. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358209019811
  30. Sano H, Shibasaki K, Matsukubo T, Takaesu Y. Effect of chitosan rinsing on reduction of dental plaque formation. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2003;44:9-16. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.44.9
  31. Chen YM, Chung YC, Wang LW, Chen KT, Li SY. Antibacterial properties of chitosan in waterborne pathogen. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2002;37:1379-1390. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120005993
  32. Busscher HJ, Engels E, Dijkstra RJ, van der Mei HC. Influence of a chitosan on oral bacterial adhesion and growth in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:493-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00568.x

Cited by

  1. Antibacterial capacity of cavity disinfectants against Streptococcus mutans and their effects on shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive vol.35, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-175
  2. Analysis of the shelf life of chitosan stored in different types of packaging, using colorimetry and dentin microhardness vol.42, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.87
  3. vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.32
  4. vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.109
  5. Antibacterial Effect and Physical-Mechanical Properties of Temporary Restorative Material Containing Antibacterial Agents vol.2015, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/697197
  6. Chitosan-PRP nanosphere as a growth factors slow releasing device with superior antibacterial capability vol.4, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aac9f8
  7. Effect of iodonium salt and chitosan on the physical and antibacterial properties of experimental infiltrants vol.33, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0075
  8. Chitosan/Fluoride Nanoparticles for Preventing Dental Caries vol.1, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x01666190212150457
  9. Evaluating antibacterial and surface mechanical properties of chitosan modified dental resin composites vol.28, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-181568
  10. Effect of antiseptic gels in the microbiologic colonization of the suture threads after oral surgery vol.10, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65007-y
  11. Evaluation of microleakage of micro hybrid composite resins versus chitosan-incorporated composite resins when restored in class v cavities using total etch and self-etch adhesives: An in vitro study vol.12, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_414_20
  12. Evaluation of Immediate and Delayed Microleakage of Class V Cavities Restored with Chitosan-incorporated Composite Resins: An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2043
  13. Nanomaterials Application in Orthodontics vol.11, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020337
  14. Antibacterial and Bonding Properties of Universal Adhesive Dental Polymers Doped with Pyrogallol vol.13, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101538
  15. Efficacy of chitosan-based chewing gum on reducing salivary S. mutans counts and salivary pH: a randomised clinical trial vol.79, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1836392
  16. 키토산 첨가 수산화칼슘 근관 충전재의 Enterococcus Faecalis에 대한 항균 효과 및 물리적 성질 vol.48, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2021.48.2.198