Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.21-25
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the centering ability of Wave.One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals

  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Su-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Min, Kyung-San (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2012.10.06
  • 심사 : 2012.11.04
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping ability of newly marketed single-file instruments, Wave One (Dentsply-Maillefer) and Reciproc (VDW GmbH), in terms of maintaining the original root canal configuration and curvature, with or without a glide-path. Materials and Methods: According to the instruments used, the blocks were divided into 4 groups (n = 10): Group 1, no glide-path / Wave One; Group 2, no glide-path / Reciproc; Group 3, #15 K-file / Wave One; Group 4, #15 K-file / Reciproc. Pre- and post-instrumented images were scanned and the canal deviation was assessed. The cyclic fatigue stress was loaded to examine the cross-sectional shape of the fractured surface. The broken fragments were evaluated under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for topographic features of the cross-section. Statistically analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test (${\alpha}$ = 0.05). Results: The ability of instruments to remain centered in prepared canals at 1 and 2 mm levels was significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.05). The centering ratio at 3, 5, and 7 mm level were not significantly different. Conclusions: The Wave One file should be used following establishment of a glide-path larger than #15.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029
  2. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32:61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017
  3. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02015.x
  4. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
  5. Cheung GS, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J 2005;38:802-809 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01020.x
  6. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF, Hsu GH, Torabinejad M. The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002;28:543-545. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00015
  7. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schnenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J 2003;36:86-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00626.x
  8. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228-230. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00011
  9. West JD. The endodontic Glidepath: "Secret to rotary safety". Dent Today 2010;29:86-93.
  10. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-575. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00007
  11. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
  12. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The 'balanced force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11:203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
  13. Roane JB, Sabala C. Clockwise or counterclockwise. J Endod 1984;10:349-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80153-3
  14. Southard DW, Oswald RJ, Natkin E. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987;13:479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80015-8
  15. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;1:255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
  16. Dummer PM, Alodeh MH, al-Omari MA. A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. Int Endod J 1991;24:63-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00809.x
  17. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26:719-723. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
  18. Thomson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. Int Endod J 1997;30:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01093.x
  19. Baumann MA, Roth A. Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88:714-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70015-6
  20. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296.
  21. Davis RD, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments. J Endod 2002;28:438-442. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00005
  22. Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26:210-216. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003

피인용 문헌

  1. Performance of RaCe Instrumentation System in Curved Root Canals: A Comprehensive Analysis by Three Study Methods vol.24, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201301920
  2. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary systems for removing root filling material: A micro-computed tomography study vol.36, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21157
  3. Cyclic fatigue of instruments for endodontic glide path vol.103, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0138-x
  4. Influence of flexion angle of files on the decentralization of oval canals during instrumentation vol.29, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0078
  5. Performance of Three Single Instrument Systems in the Preparation of Long Oval Canals vol.27, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302449
  6. Quantitative transportation assessment in curved canals prepared with an off-centered rectangular design system vol.30, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0043
  7. Endodontic treatment of mandibular molar with root dilaceration using Reciproc single-file system vol.38, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.167
  8. Effect of passive ultrasonic agitation during final irrigation on cleaning capacity of hybrid instrumentation vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.104
  9. Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems vol.41, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.1
  10. Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e3
  11. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems vol.15, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0137-0
  12. Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review-Part II: Properties and Effectiveness vol.41, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.018
  13. Apical Transportation, Centering Ability, and Cleaning Effectiveness of Reciprocating Single-file System Associated with Different Glide Path Techniques vol.41, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.005
  14. Influence of Cervical and Apical Enlargement Associated with the WaveOne System on the Transportation and Centralization of Endodontic Preparations vol.42, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.005
  15. Transportation Assessment in Simulated Curved Canals after preparation with Twisted File Adaptive and BT-Race instruments vol.9, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54220
  16. Comparing the Centering Ability of Different Pathfinding Systems and Their Effect on Final Instrumentation by Hyflex CM vol.43, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.022
  17. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals vol.12, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.010
  18. Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel–titanium files in simulated severe curved canals vol.32, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4081/j.gien.2018.2
  19. Shaping Ability of HyFlex EDM and ProTaper Next Rotary Instruments in Curved Root Canals: A Micro-CT Study vol.20, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2579
  20. Shaping Ability of Reciproc R25 File and Mtwo System Used in Continuous and Reciprocating Motion vol.21, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2760
  21. Canal transportation and centering ability of root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems with and without PathFiles in cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional molar prot vol.24, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_200_21
  22. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of manual K-files and reciprocating files in glide path preparation: a micro-computed tomography study of constricted canals vol.21, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01440-3
  23. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals vol.17, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.008