대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제40권1호
  • /
  • Pages.21-27
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악 과성장형 골격성 III급 부정교합 아동의 치아성숙도에 관한 연구

A STUDY ON THE DENTAL MATURATION IN CHILDREN WITH CLASS III SKELETAL MALOCCLUSION OF MANDIBULAR OVERGROWTH TYPE

  • 류현정 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이창한 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Ryu, Hyun Jung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Chang Han (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.04
  • 심사 : 2013.02.15
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현재까지의 많은 연구들을 통해 치아의 발육상태와 골격성 부정교합과의 연관성이 보고되어 왔다. 본 연구는 방사선학적 방법을 통하여 정상교합군과 하악 과성장형 골격성 3급 부정교합군의 상하악 치령 및 제2대구치 맹출률을 비교, 분석하여, 파노라마 방사선 사진으로 평가 가능한 상하악 치아성숙도의 차이가 하악 과성장형 골격성 3급 부정교합의 감별진단 요소로 의의가 있는지 알아볼 목적으로 시행되었다. 부산대학교 소아치과에 내원한 Hellman 치령 IIIA의 환자를 대상으로 정상교합군과 하악 과성장형 골격성 3급 부정교합군 각 50명을 선택한 후, 이들의 파노라마 방사선 사진을 이용하여 Demirjian법으로 각 군의 상하악 치령 및 제2대구치 맹출률을 구하고 그 차이를 비교, 분석하였다. 그 결과 정상교합군과 하악 과성장형 골격성 3급 부정교합군의 상하 치령의 차이는 각각 0.66세와 1.20세로 하악 과성장형 골격성 3급 부정교합군에서 유의하게 더 큰 차이를 보였으며(p < 0.05), 상하 제2대구치 맹출률은 두 그룹 간 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05).

In growing children it is frequently found that dental maturation is strongly influenced by the growth rate of maxilla or mandible. If there is evidence to prove this, it might be utilized as a criterion in the early diagnosis of skeletal malocclusion, even before the object's real skeletal features are yet revealed. The purpose of this study was to find out if the difference of dental maturation in over-grown mandible in children with skeletal Class III has any relationship with some skeletal features of mandible. 50 patients in Hellman dental age IIIA with normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion of mandibular over-growth type respectively were selected as study objects. The age estimation was performed on maxillary and mandibular teeth, eruption rate of the 2nd molars of each group have been measured on panoramic radiography, and the differences in dental age of the upper and lower jaw were analyzed under Demirijian's method. The results were as follows: The difference of dental age of maxillary and mandibular teeth between the two groups was 0.66 and 1.20 years respectively, with a higher difference in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The difference of eruption rate of the maxillary and mandibular second molar was not found between two group (p >0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Koo YH, Hyun HK, Kim CC, et al. : Characteristics of orthodontic patients in department of pediatric dentistry, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 36:550-555, 2009.
  2. Moyers RE : Handbook of Orthodontics, 4th ed. Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, Chicago, 410-415, 453-460, 1988.
  3. Suhr CH : A study on calcification of the second molars in Angle class I malocclusion. Korean J Orthod, 39:201-204, 1983.
  4. Cha KS : A study on calcification of the second molars in skeletal class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod, 11:101-108, 1981.
  5. Kim RM : A study on calcification of the second molars in skeletal class II malocclusion. Korean J Orthod, 11:125-133, 1981.
  6. Demirjian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, et al. : Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod, 88:433-438, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90070-3
  7. Shumaker DB, EI Hadary MS : Roentgenographic study of eruption. J Am Dent Assoc, 61:535-541, 1960.
  8. Scott JH : The analysis of facial growth. I. The anteroposterior and vertical dimensions. Am J Orthod, 44:507-512, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(58)90083-6
  9. Lee KS : A roentgenocephalometric study on mandibular prognathism. Korean J Orthod, 9:85-98, 1979.
  10. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, et al. : Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod, 66:140- 171, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90233-4
  11. Riedel RA : Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod, 20:168-178, 1950.
  12. Pascoe JJ, Hayward JR, Costich ER : Mandibular prognathism; its etiology and a classification. J Oral Surg Aneth and Hosp D Serv, 39:860-870, 1981.
  13. Park SJ, Lee DJ : A study of differentiation between maxillary undergrowth and mandibular overgrowth in Class III malocclusion. Oral Biol Res, 16:1-20, 1992.
  14. Freeman RS : Adjusting A-N-B angle to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod, 51:162-171, 1981.
  15. Sue GY : Indicators of skeletal class III growth. J Dent Res, 66:348-360, 1987.
  16. Suda N, Hiyama S, Kuroda T : Relationship between formation/eruption of maxillary teeth and skeletal pattern of maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121:46-52, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.120686
  17. T Haruki, R Kanomi, T Shimono : The differences in the chronology and calcification second molars between Angle Class III and Class II occlusions in Japanese children. J Dent Child, 64:400-404, 1997.
  18. An UJ, Noh HS, Kim S, et al. : The dental maturation maxilla in children with anterior crossbite of maxillary undergrowth type. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 38:119-128, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2011.38.2.119
  19. Korean Acad Pediatr Dent : Dentistry for the child and adolescent. Sin-hung international, Seoul, 56, 2007.
  20. Hwang CI, Suhr CH : A roentgenocephalometric study on the effects of the chin cap in the skeletal class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod, 19:219-243, 1989.
  21. Graber LW : Chin cap therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Ortho, 72:23-41, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90122-1
  22. Sugawara J : Long-term effects of chin cap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognatism. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 98:127-133, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70006-X
  23. Itoh T, Chaconas SJ, Caputo AA, et al. : Photoelastic effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod, 66:140-171, 1985.
  24. Mermigos J, Full CA, Andeasen G : Protraction of the maxillofacial comlplex. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 98:47-55, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70031-7
  25. Tanne K, Sakuda M : Biomechanical and clinical chages of the craniofacial complex from orthopedic maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod, 61:145-152, 1991.
  26. Kim SE, Yang KH : Case reports on treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with RME and Facemask. J Korean Acad Pediatr dent, 25:604-612, 1998.
  27. Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, et al. : Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod, 56:7-30, 1986.

피인용 문헌

  1. Association between Ectopic Eruption of the Maxillary First Permanent Molar and Skeletal Malocclusion vol.44, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.2.147