Enamel Matrix Derivate for Periodontal Regeneration in the Interproximal Periodontal Defect Model

  • Lee, Kyu An (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Soo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2013.09.16
  • Accepted : 2013.10.15
  • Published : 2013.12.01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enamel matrix derivate (EMD) with combination of composite bovine-derivate xenograft on the periodontal regeneration in the interproximal periodontal defect model. The interproximal periodontal defects (IPDs) were surgically prepared between the first and second maxillary premolar, and the second and third maxillary premolar in four beagle dogs. EMD, collagenized bovine hydroxyapatite (CBHA), combination of two material, and sham surgery were allocated for each IPD. After eight weeks, the animals were sacrificed and the defects were analyzed by radiographic, histologic, and histometric methods. Regenerated woven bone was observed and cementoid was created along the adjacent root surfaces with proliferation of cementoblasts in every group. In the combination of EMD and CBHA group, Sharpey's fiber was observed beyond the crest of new bone and along the newly formed cementum, and apical migration of junctional epithelium appeared to be blocked by new cementum. In the BC and EMD+CBHA groups, the residual bovine hydroxyapatite particles were found in the periodontal defect. No direct contact was observed between residual particles and tooth surfaces. No remarkable difference was found between the histometric results among the groups. Within the limitation of this study, EMD, CBHA, and combination of two materials showed similar periodontal regeneration in the interproximal periodontal defect model. Further investigation on combination with barrier membrane may be required for improvement of the regenerative potential.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Nyman, J. Lindhe, T. Karring et al., "New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease," J. Clin. Periodontol., 9, 290-296 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02095.x
  2. J. Gottlow, S. Nyman, J. Lindhe et al., "New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports," J. Clin. Periodontol., 13, 604-616 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00854.x
  3. R. G. Caffesse, B. A. Smith, W. A. Castelli et al., "New attachment achieved by guided tissue regeneration in beagle dogs," J. Periodontol., 59, 589-594 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.9.589
  4. J. Caton, C. Wagener, A. Polson et al., "Guided tissue regeneration in interproximal defects in the monkey," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 12, 266-277 (1992).
  5. A. Sculean, N. Donos, M. Brecx et al., "Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration and enamel-matrix-proteins. An experimental study in monkeys," J. Clin. Periodontol., 27, 466-472 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027007466.x
  6. R. G. Caffesse, L. E. Dominguez, C. E. Nasjleti et al., "Furcation defects in dogs treated by guided tissue regeneration (GTR)," J. Periodontol., 61, 45-50 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.1.45
  7. R. Niederman, E. D. Savitt, J. D. Heeley et al., "Regeneration of furca bone using Gore-Tex periodontal material," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 9, 468-480 (1989).
  8. J. Gottlow, T. Karring, and S. Nyman, "Guided tissue regeneration following treatment of recession-type defects in the monkey," J. Periodontol., 61, 680-685 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.11.680
  9. T. J. Sigurdsson, R. Hardwick, G. C. Bogle et al., "Periodontal repair in dogs: space provision by reinforced ePTFE membranes enhances bone and cementum regeneration in large supraalveolar defects," J. Periodontol., 65, 350-356 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.4.350
  10. A. Sculean, A. Stavropoulos, P. Windisch et al., "Healing of human intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal therapy with a bovine-derived xenograft and guided tissue regeneration," Clin. Oral Investig., 8, 70-74 (2004).
  11. P. Cortellini, C. Clauser, and G. P. Prato, "Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure," J. Periodontol., 64, 387-391 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.5.387
  12. P. Cortellini, G. Pini Prato, and M. S. Tonetti, "Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects with titanium reinforced membranes. A controlled clinical trial," J. Periodontol., 66, 797-803 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.797
  13. P. Cortellini, G. Pini Prato, and M. S. Tonetti, "Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes. A controlled clinical trial," J. Periodontol., 67, 217-223 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.217
  14. M. S. Tonetti, P. Cortellini, J. E. Suvan et al., "Generalizability of the added benefits of guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. Evaluation in a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial," J. Periodontol., 69, 1183-1192 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1183
  15. N. Blumenthal and J. Steinberg, "The use of collagen membrane barriers in conjunction with combined demineralized bone-collagen gel implants in human infrabony defects," J. Periodontol., 61, 319-327 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.6.319
  16. P. Ratka-Kruger, E. Neukranz, and P. Raetzke, "Guided tissue regeneration procedure with bioresorbable membranes versus conventional flap surgery in the treatment of infrabony periodontal defects," J. Clin. Periodontol., 27, 120-127 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027002120.x
  17. S. Gestrelius, C. Andersson, D. Lidstrom et al., "In vitro studies on periodontal ligament cells and enamel matrix derivative," J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 685-692 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00250.x
  18. L. Hammarstrom, L. Heijl, and S. Gestrelius, "Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins," J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 669-677 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00248.x
  19. S. Gestrelius, C. Andersson, A. C. Johansson et al., "Formulation of enamel matrix derivative for surface coating. Kinetics and cell colonization," J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 678-684 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00249.x
  20. P. F. Regazzini, A. B. Novaes, Jr., P. T. de Oliveira et al., "Comparative study of enamel matrix derivative with or without GTR in the treatment of class II furcation lesions in dogs," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 24, 476-487 (2004).
  21. E. A. Sallum, S. P. Pimentel, J. B. Saldanha et al., "Enamel matrix derivative and guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of dehiscence-type defects: a histomorphometric study in dogs," J. Periodontol., 75, 1357-1363 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1357
  22. K. Alhezaimi, T. Al-Shalan, R. O'Neill et al., "Connective tissue-cementum regeneration: a new histologic regeneration following the use of enamel matrix derivative in dehiscence-type defects. A dog model," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 29, 425-433 (2009).
  23. A. Parashis and K. Tsiklakis, "Clinical and radiographic findings following application of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects. A series of case reports," J. Clin. Periodontol., 27, 705-713 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009705.x
  24. L. Heijl, G. Heden, G. Svardstrom et al., "Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects," J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 705-714 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00253.x
  25. G. Heden, "A case report study of 72 consecutive Emdogain-treated intrabony periodontal defects: clinical and radiographic findings after 1 year," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 20, 127-139 (2000).
  26. G. Heden, J. Wennstrom, and J. Lindhe, "Periodontal tissue alterations following Emdogain treatment of periodontal sites with angular bone defects. A series of case reports," J. Clin. Periodontol., 26, 855-860 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1997.00855.x
  27. M. S. Tonetti, N. P. Lang, P. Cortellini et al., "Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects," J. Clin. Periodontol., 29, 317-325 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290407.x
  28. S. Jepsen, B. Heinz, K. Jepsen et al., "A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal Class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part I: Study design and results for primary outcomes," J. Periodontol., 75, 1150-1160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1150
  29. J. Meyle, J. R. Gonzales, R. H. Bodeker et al., "A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part II: secondary outcomes," J. Periodontol., 75, 1188-1195 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1188
  30. V. I. Siciliano, G. Andreuccetti, A. I. Siciliano et al., "Clinical outcomes after treatment of non-contained intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative or guided tissue regeneration: a 12- month randomized controlled clinical trial," J. Periodontol., 82, 62-71 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100144
  31. N. Donos, L. Glavind, T. Karring et al., "Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative and a bioresorbable membrane in the treatment of degree III mandibular furcation involvement: a series of nine patients," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 24, 362-369 (2004).
  32. R. J. Miron, D. D. Bosshardt, E. Hedbom et al., "Adsorption of enamel matrix proteins to a bovine-derived bone grafting material and its regulation of cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation," J. Periodontol., 83, 936-947 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110480
  33. V. Lekovic, P. M. Camargo, M. Weinlaender et al., "A comparison between enamel matrix proteins used alone or in combination with bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans," J. Periodontol., 71, 1110-1116 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.7.1110
  34. D. Velasquez-Plata, E. T. Scheyer, and J. T. Mellonig, "Clinical comparison of an enamel matrix derivative used alone or in combination with a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans," J. Periodontol., 73, 433-440 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.4.433
  35. P. M. Camargo, V. Lekovic, M. Weinlaender et al., "The effectiveness of enamel matrix proteins used in combination with bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans," J. Clin. Periodontol., 28, 1016-1022 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2001.281105.x
  36. V. Lekovic, P. M. Camargo, M. Weinlaender et al., "The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with enamel matrix proteins or with an autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans," J. Periodontol., 72, 1157-1163 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1157
  37. E. T. Scheyer, D. Velasquez-Plata, M. A. Brunsvold et al., "A clinical comparison of a bovine-derived xenograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans," J. Periodontol., 73, 423-432 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.4.423
  38. S. Yamamoto, H. Masuda, Y. Shibukawa et al., "Combination of bovine-derived xenografts and enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in dogs," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 27, 471-479 (2007).
  39. A. Sculean, P. Windisch, T. Keglevich et al., "Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bovine-derived xenograft," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 23, 47-55 (2003).
  40. A. Sculean, G. C. Chiantella, P. Windisch et al., "Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain) combined with a bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 22, 259-267 (2002).
  41. G. Zucchelli, C. Amore, L. Montebugnoli et al., "Enamel matrix proteins and bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony defects: a comparative controlled clinical trial," J. Periodontol., 74, 1725-1735 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1725
  42. M. L. Nevins, M. Camelo, S. E. Lynch et al., "Evaluation of periodontal regeneration following grafting intrabony defects with bio-oss collagen: a human histologic report," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 23, 9-17 (2003).
  43. M. L. Nevins, M. Camelo, A. Rebaudi et al., "Three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic evaluation of periodontal regeneration: a human report of intrabony defects treated with Bio-Oss collagen," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 25, 365-373 (2005).
  44. A. Sculean, G. C. Chiantella, P. Windisch et al., "Healing of intrabony defects following treatment with a composite bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide PERIO)," J. Clin. Periodontol., 32, 720-724 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00758.x
  45. G. A. Hartman, R. M. Arnold, M. P. Mills et al., "Clinical and histologic evaluation of anorganic bovine bone collagen with or without a collagen barrier," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 24, 127-135 (2004).
  46. G. Cardaropoli, M. Araujo, R. Hayacibara et al., "Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog," J. Clin. Periodontol., 32, 435-440 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.x
  47. M. G. Araujo and J. Lindhe, "Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog," Clin. Oral Implants Res., 20, 433-440 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x
  48. U. M. Wikesjo and K. A. Selvig, "Periodontal wound healing and regeneration," Periodontol. 2000, 19, 21-39 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00145.x
  49. C. S. Kim, S. H. Choi, J. K. Chai et al., "Periodontal repair in surgically created intrabony defects in dogs: influence of the number of bone walls on healing response," J. Periodontol., 75, 229-235 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.229
  50. O. Zetterstrom, C. Andersson, L. Eriksson et al., "Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of periodontal defects," J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 697-704 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00252.x
  51. A. Sculean, N. Donos, A. Miliauskaite et al., "Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins or bioabsorbable membranes. A 4-year follow-up split-mouth study," J. Periodontol., 72, 1695-1701 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.12.1695
  52. A. Sculean, N. Donos, A. Blaes et al., "Comparison of enamel matrix proteins and bioabsorbable membranes in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. A split-mouth study," J. Periodontol., 70, 255-262 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.3.255
  53. P. Proussaefs, J. Lozada, A. Kleinman et al., "The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study," Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 17, 238-248 (2002).
  54. R. A. Yukna and J. T. Mellonig, "Histologic evaluation of periodontal healing in humans following regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative. A 10-case series," J. Periodontol., 71, 752-759 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.752
  55. C. E. Nemcovsky, S. Zahavi, O. Moses et al., "Effect of enamel matrix protein derivative on healing of surgical supra-infrabony periodontal defects in the rat molar: a histomorphometric study," J. Periodontol., 77, 996-1002 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050317
  56. U. W. Jung, Y. Y. Chang, Y. J. Um et al., "Interproximal periodontal defect model in dogs: a pilot study," Oral Dis., 17, 26-32 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01694.x
  57. L. Ritter, J. Neugebauer, R. A. Mischkowski et al., "Evaluation of the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in the mental foramen by cone beam computed tomography," Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 27, 1014-1021 (2012).
  58. M. Camelo, M. L. Nevins, R. K. Schenk et al., "Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 18, 321-331 (1998).
  59. J. T. Mellonig, "Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived bone xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 20, 19-29 (2000).
  60. M. Camelo, M. L. Nevins, S. E. Lynch et al., "Periodontal regeneration with an autogenous bone-Bio-Oss composite graft and a Bio-Gide membrane," Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 21, 109-119 (2001).