DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adsorption and Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds from Fabrics with β-Cyclodextrin Finish

직물의 β-cyclodextrin 가공에 따른 휘발성 유기성분의 흡착과 제거

  • Received : 2012.12.11
  • Accepted : 2013.01.15
  • Published : 2013.01.31

Abstract

Clothes that retain and emanate body odor feel uncomfortable and unclean; subsequently, the adsorption, desorption and removal amounts of malodorous compounds from fabrics with different polarities were examined. 1-Octen-3-one, octanal and isovaleric acid, which are important malodor compounds from the body, were used as volatile organic compounds (VOC). Samples were prepared with unfinished and ${\beta}$-CD finished cotton, nylon and PET fabrics. The amounts of VOCs retained on the fabrics were measured using headspace GC-MS; in addition, the odor intensity of the samples were evaluated by 10 trained panelists. The amounts adsorbed were estimated by weight gain; however, moisture was found to have a larger effect on the increase in weight than VOCs. The polarity of the VOCs decreased in the order of isovaleric acid, octanal and 1-octen-3-one. Despite the exceptionally large amounts of octanal adsorbed on the nylon sample, the amounts of malodorous compounds adsorbed on fabrics increased with the decreasing VOC molecular weight. The unfinished PET sample adsorbed more VOCs than the unfinished-fabric samples. The odor intensity was mostly weaker in the ${\beta}$-CD finished fabrics than in the unfinished fabrics. The odor intensity of the ${\beta}$-CD finished fabrics was lower than unfinished fabrics. The amount of VOCs that remained on the soiled fabric samples after storing in air for 24 hrs decreased with the increasing VOC vapor pressure. Most VOCs were removed by washing; however, more VOCs were left on the ${\beta}$-CD finished fabrics than unfinished fabrics. The intensity of the odor from the unfinished PET and ${\beta}$-CD finished fabrics was stronger and weaker, respectively, than that of other fabrics, even when the same amounts of VOCs remained.

Keywords

References

  1. Bowers, C. A., & Chantrey, G. (1969). Factors controlling the soiling of white polyester cotton fabrics Part I: Laboratory studies. Textile Research Journal, 39(1), 1−11. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051756903900101
  2. Chung, H., & Hwang, N. (2012). Characteristics of $\beta$-cyclodextrin finished nylon and PET fabrics. Textile Science and Engineering, 49(2), 82−91. https://doi.org/10.12772/TSE.2012.49.2.082
  3. Chung, H., & Seok, H. J. (2012). Populations of malodor-forming bacteria and identification of volatile components in triolein-soiled cotton fabric. Fibers and Polymers, 13(6), 740−747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0740-5
  4. Chung, H. W., & Obendorf, S. K. (1992). Removal of soils from the PET fabric treated with hydrophilic chemicals. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 16(1), 65−71.
  5. Fort, T., Billica, H. R., & Grindstaff, T. H. (1966). Studies of soiling and detergency Part II: Detergency experiments with model fatty soils. Textile Research Journal, 36(2), 99−112. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051756603600201
  6. Fouda, M. M. G., & Fahmy, H. M. (2011). Multifunctional finish and cotton cellulose fabric. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(2), 625−629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.086
  7. Hara, K., Mikuni, K., Hara, K., & Hashiomoto, H. (2002). Effects of cyclodextrins on deodoration of aging odor. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, 44, 241−246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023046413846
  8. Huh, J., Lee, K. J., Pak, P., & Chung, Y. (2007). Perfumed finishing of cotton fabric by treatment of $\beta$-cyclodextrin and crosslinking agent. Textile Science and Engineering, 44(2), 90−96.
  9. Iwasaki, Y., Kamigawara, K., Harreveld, A. P., Mahin, T. D., Park, S. J., Yang, S. B., Sneath, R. W., Ueno, H., Higuchi, T., Saiki, K., Jiang, J. K., Nagata, Y., Koe, L. C. C., Osako, M., Kita, J., & Frechen, F. B. (2003). Odor measurement review. Tokyo: Office of Odor, Noise and Vibration, Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment.
  10. Jeon, G., & Cheong, K. (2010). A study on the malodor evaluation methodology in the odor emission industry using electronic nose system. Korean Journal of Odor Research and Engineering, 9(1), 23−30.
  11. Martel, B., Morcellet, M., Ruffin, D., Vinet, F., & Weltrowski, M. (2002). Capture and controlled release of fragrances by CD finished textiles. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemesty, 44, 439−442. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023028105012
  12. McQueen, R. H., Laing, R. M., Delahunty, C. M., Brooks, H. J. L., & Niven, B. E. (2008). Retention of axillary odour on apparel fabrics. Journal of the Textile Institute, 99(6), 515−523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000701659774
  13. Munk, S., Munch, P., Stahnke, L., Adler-Nissen, J., & Schieberle, P. (2000). Primary odorants of laundry soiled with sweat/sebum: Influence of lipase on the odor profile. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 3(4), 505−515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-000-0150-z
  14. Owens, D. K. (1970). Some thermodynamic aspects of polymer adhesion. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 14(7), 1725−1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1970.070140706
  15. The free chemical database. (2012). ChemSpider. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://www.chemspider.com
  16. Voncina, B., Vivod, V., & Chen, W. (2009). Surface modification of PET fibers with the use of $\beta$-Cyclodextrin. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 113(6), 3891−3895. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30400
  17. Weir, R. D., & De Loos, TH. W. (2005). Measurement of the thermodynamic properties of multiple phases. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
  18. Yen, M., Chen, J., & Chen, C. (2005). Degree of crosslinking and physical properties of dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea/ acrylic acid crosslinked cotton fabrics after treatment with various metallic salts. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 97, 584−594. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21232

Cited by

  1. Toxicity Factor Analysis through the Exposure Experiment of the Combustion Products on Wood-Based Materials vol.30, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.2016.30.6.057