대한인간공학회지 (Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea)

  • 제32권1호
  • /
  • Pages.97-106
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-1684(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8462(eISSN)
대한인간공학회 (Ergonomics Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Preliminary Study on the Communication Effect on Team Performance in Main Control Room of SMART

  • Heo, Eun Mee (Department of Industrial Engineering, The University of Kyunghee) ;
  • Byun, Seong Nam (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, The University of Kyunghee)
  • 투고 : 2013.01.21
  • 심사 : 2013.01.31
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the attributing factors influencing team performance. Background: Technically, it is necessary that operators adapt themselves to computerized and advanced techniques to operate the main control rooms safely in nuclear power plant in Korea. The more main control rooms are digitalized, the more important for operators to have high team performance it is. Method: This paper analyzes team process through literatures review and elicits team performance shaping factor. Especially, the objective of this research is to elicit communication using common team performance shaping factors. Results: This study has found communication through team performance shaping factors in Main Control Room of the SMART. Conclusion: This paper can offer a starting point for team communication, which can use team performance shaping factor framework that are emerging in these new nuclear power plant. Application: As a result, I expect that the evaluation communication for MCR operator's team performance will lead the operating techniques in nuclear power industry internationally.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baik, K.B., Jung, D.I. and Shin, J.G., A longitudinal study on the effects of group competence and collective efficacy on performance: Measurement, level of analysis, and the importance of performance feedback, Journal of Human Resource Development, 2(1), 115-140, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/152342230000200110
  2. Barker, L.L., Wahlers, K.J. and Watson, K.W., Groups in process: An introduction to small group communication, 5th ed., Allyn and Bacon, 1995.
  3. Bowers, C., Jentsch, F., Salas, E. and Braun, C., Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment, Human Factors, 40(4), 672-679, 1989.
  4. Bowers, C.A., Salas, E. and Braun, C.C., Analyzing communication sequence for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40(4) 672-679, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779649265
  5. Bowers, C., Deato, J., Oser, R., Prince, C. and Kolb, M., Impact of automation on aircrew communication and decisionmaking performance, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 145-167, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0502_2
  6. Bradach, J.L. and Eccles, R.G., Markets vs hierarchies: From ideal types to plural forms, Annual Review of Sociology, No. 15, pp. 97-118, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525
  7. Byun, S.N. and Lee, D.H., Preliminary Safety Review on the Design of Korea Next Generation Reactor: A Human Factors Evaluation of Advanced Control Facilities in Korea Next Generation Reactor, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, KINS/HR-404, 2001.
  8. Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J. and Higgs, A.C., Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups, Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
  9. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E. and Volpe, C.E., Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team eflectiveness and decision making in organizations; 333-380. San Francisco: 1995.
  10. Chidester, T.R., Helmreich, R.L., Gregorich, S.E. and Geis, C.E., Pilot personality and crew coordination: Implications for training and selection, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(1), 25 -44, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_3
  11. Coblentz, A. and Mollard, R., Human efficiency variability in monotonous conditions effects on safety, Human decision making and manual control, 76-86, 1989.
  12. Cummings, J.N. and Cross, R., Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance, Social Networks, No. 25, pp. 197-210, 2003.
  13. Dennis, A.R. and Kinney, S.T., Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality, Information Systems Research, No. 9, pp. 256-274, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256
  14. DeSantis, G. and Monge, P., Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 6.
  15. Dwyer, D.J., Fowlkes, J., Oser, R.L., Salas, E. and Lane, N.E., Team performance measurement in distributed environments: The TARGETs methodology. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications, pp. 137-153. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1997.
  16. Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A., Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, MIT Press, 1984.
  17. Federico, P., Expert and novice recognition of similar situations. Human Factors, 37(1), 105-122, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049471
  18. Flin, R. and Martin, L., Behavioral markers for crew resource management, Civil Aviation Authority Paper 98005. London: University of Aberdeen, 1998.
  19. Ford, J.D. and Ford, L.W., The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 541-570, 1995.
  20. Fowlkes, J.E., Lane, N.E., Dwyer, D.J., Willis, R.P. and Oser, R., Team performance measurement issues in DIS-based training environments. In Proceedings of the 14th Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference (pp. 272-280). Arlington, VA: American Defense Preparedness Association, 1995.
  21. Gaddy, C. and Wachtel, J., Team skills training in nuclear power plant operations, in Swezey, R. and Salas, E. (Eds), Teams: Their Training and Performance, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1992.
  22. Goldstein, I.L., Training in work organizations, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 229-272, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001305
  23. Goldstein, I.L., Training in work organizations, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 229-272, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001305
  24. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R., Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing-A comparison between two new product teams, Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 360-373, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.3.360
  25. Guo, Z. and Uhrig, R.E., Nuclear power plant performance study by using neural networks, IEEE transaction on nuclear science, 39(4), 915-918, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.159732
  26. Ha, J.S., Seong, P.H, Lee, M.S. and Hong, J.H., Development of human performance measure for human factors validation in the advanced MCR of APR-1400, IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2687-2700, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.907549
  27. Hackman, J.R. and Morris, C.G., Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 45-99, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  28. Hackman, J.R. and Walton, R.E., Leading groups in organizations, In P.S. Goodman, & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups, pp. 72-119, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
  29. Hackman, J.R., Effects of task characteristics on group products, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 4, pp. 162-187, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90040-1
  30. Hackman, J.R., A normative model of work team effectiveness (Tech. Rep. No. 2), New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1983.
  31. Hackman, J.R., Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances, Boston: HBS Press, 2002.
  32. Handy, C., Trust and the virtual organization, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 40-50, 1995.
  33. Hauptman, O. and Hirji, K.K., The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: An empirical study of cross-functional teams, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.153-164, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.509981
  34. Helmreich, R.L., Fifteen years of the CRM wars: A report form the trenches, IN B.J. Hayward & A.R. Lowe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium, 73-87, Melbourne: The Australian Aviation Psychology Association, 1993.
  35. Helmreich, R.L. and Foushee, H.C., Why Crew Resource Management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In e. Wiener, B. Kanki, & R. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit Resource Management, pp.3-45. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.
  36. Helmreich, R.L. and Wilhelm, J.A., Outcomes of Crew Resource Management training, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(4), 287 -300, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0104_3
  37. Helmreich, R.L., Butler, R.E., Taggart, W.R. and Wilhelm, J.A., Behavioral markers in accidents and incidents: Reference list. NASA/UT/FAA Technical Report 95-1. Austin, TX: The University of Texas, 1995.
  38. Helmreich, R.L. et al., The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation, The international journal of aviation psychology, 9(1), 19-32, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2
  39. Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C. and Wilhelm, J.A., The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2
  40. Helmreich, R.L., Wilhelm, J.A., Klinect, J.R. and Merritt, A.C., (In press), Culture, error, and Crew Resource Management. In E. Salas, C.A. Bowers, & E. Edens (Eds.), Applying resource management in organizations: A guide for professionals. Hill sdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  41. Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S., Communications across boundaries: Work, structures, and use of communications technologies in a large organization, Organization Science, Vol. 6l, No. 4, pp. 373-393, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.373
  42. Hines, W.E., Teams and technology: Flight crew performance in standard and automated aircraft. The University of Texas at Austin: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, 1998.
  43. Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H.G., Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence, Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 435-449, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
  44. Holt, R.W., Meiman, E. and Seamster, T.L., Evaluation of aircraft pilot team performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (p. 44-48), 1996.
  45. INPO, Control Room Teamwork Development Training: Course Administration and Facilitation Guide, National Academy for Nuclear Training, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
  46. INSAG, International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (1986), Summary report on the Post-Accident Review Meeting on Chernobyl Accident. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. instructorbased training, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(4), 141-157, 2001.
  47. Jossey-Bass. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E., What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of Management, 23, 239-290, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
  48. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E., Communication and trust in global virtual teams, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 791-815, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
  49. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Rao, V.S. and Huber. G.P., Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 645-666, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/249137
  50. Jeffrey S, Kane, Behavioral Observation Scales and The Evaluation of Performance Appraisal Effectiveness, 1982.
  51. Kanki, B.G. and Foushee. H.C., Communication as group process mediator of aircrew performance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 60, pp. 402-410, 1989.
  52. Kanki, B.G. and Lozito, S., Communication indices of crew communication, Aviation space and environmental medicine, 1989
  53. Corradini P, Cacciari C, The effect of workload and work shift on air traffic control: taxonomy of communication problem, Cognition Techno Work, 4(4), 229-239, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110200021
  54. Kettunen, J. and Pyy, P., Assessing communication practices and crew performance in a NPP control room environment - A prestudy, TAU-001/00, 2000.
  55. Kim, S.K., Development and Evaluation of Crew Resource Management Training for Improving Team Performance of Operators in the APR-1400 Nuclear Power Plant, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University, Dissertation of Industrial Engineering, 2008.
  56. KINS, Development of Evaluation Technique for MCR Operator's Team Performance., KINS/RR-555, KINS, 2008.
  57. Lee, D.H., Byun, S.N. and Lee, Y.H., Short-Term Human Factors Engineering Measures for Minimizing Human Error in Nuclear Power Facilities, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 26(4), 121-125, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2007.26.4.121
  58. Leonard, M., Graham, S. and Bonacum, D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. i85-i90, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
  59. Mann, W. C., http://www.sfu.ca/rst/, 2007.
  60. Mathieu, J.E. and Button, S.B., An examination of the relative impact of normative information and selfefficacy on personal goals and performance over time, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 1758 -1775, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00975.x
  61. Mathieu, J.E. and Zaccaro, S.J., A temporally based framework and taxnomy of team process,Academy oi Management Review 2001, Vol. 26, No. 3, 356-376, 2001.
  62. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D., An integrative model of organizationrust, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 709-734, 1995.
  63. Min, D.W., A Survey on Methods for Analyzing Team Communication, Journal of Information Technology Application & Management, 14(2), 169-187, 2007.
  64. Montgomery, J. Gaddy, C. and Toquam, J., Team interaction skills evaluation criteria for nuclear power plant control room operators, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 2-6 September, 918-22, Santa Monica, CA: HFS, 1991.
  65. Moreno, J.L., Sociometry, experimental method and science of society, Beacon, NY: Beacon House, 1951.
  66. Mumaw, R., Swatzler, D., Roth, E. and Thomas, W., Cognitive skill training for nuclear power plant operational decision making (NUREG/ CR-6126), Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1994.
  67. Ngwenyama, O.K. and Lee. A.S., Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 145-167, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/249417
  68. O'Hara, J.M. and Hall, R.E., Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: implications for human reliability, Brookhaven National Laboratory, NewYork 11973, 1405-1409, 1990.
  69. Oh, Y.J., Yun, J.H. and Lee, Y.H., An Evaluation of the Communication Efficiency of the Main Control Room Operators in Nuclear Power Plants, Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2010.
  70. Paul O'Connor, Angela O'Dea, Rhona Flin, Steve Belton, Identifying the team skills required by nuclear power plant operations personnel, Industrial Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38, 1028-1037, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.014
  71. Pinto, M.B. and Pinto, J.K., Project team communication and cross functional cooperation in new program development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, pp. 200-212, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(90)90004-X
  72. Prinzo, O. and Morrow, D., Improving pilot/air traffic control voice communication in general aviation, Int J Aviat Psychol, 12(4), 341 -357, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1204_2
  73. Prinzo O., Pilot's visual acquisition of traffic: operational communication from an in-flight evaluation of a cockpit display of traffic information, Int J Aviat Psychol, 13(3), 211-231, 2002.
  74. Reason, J., The Chernobyl errors. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 201-206, 1987.
  75. Rogovin, M. and Frampton, G.T., Three Mile Island: A report to the Commission and the public (NUREG/CR-1250, Vol. 1). Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Special Inquiry Group, Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1980.
  76. Roth, E.M. et al., An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitively demanding simulated emergencies, NUREG/CR-6208. Washington, DC: USNRC, 1994.
  77. Salas, E., Gerlad F. Goodwin, and C. Shawn Bueke. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disiplinary perspective and approches. Psychology press Taylor & Francis group, 2009.
  78. Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M.A. Quiiiones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 249-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997.
  79. Schraagen, J.M. and Rasker, P.C., Communication in command and control teams, TNO human factors, The Netherlands.
  80. Seamster, T.L. et al., Developing Advanced Crew Resource Management (ACRM) Training: A Taining Manual, 1998.
  81. Seamster, T.L., Edens, E.S. and Holt, R.W., Scenario event sets and the reliability of CRM assessment. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1995.
  82. Seamster, T.L., Hamman, W.R. and Edens, E.S., Specification of observable behaviors within LOE/LOFT event sets. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1995.
  83. Sebok, A., Team performance in process control: influences of interface design and staffing levels, Ergonomics, 43(8), 1210-1236, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084950
  84. Smith, P.C. and Kendall, L.M., Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction on unambiguous anchors for rating scales, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 47, pp. 149-155, 1963. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047060
  85. Stout, R.J., Salas, E. and Fowkes, J.E., Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training, group dynamics: Theory, research and practice, 1(2), 169-182, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.169
  86. Stout, R.J., Salas, E. and Fowlkes, J., Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, I, 169-182, 1997.
  87. Straus, S.G., Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connection in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups, Human-Computer Interaction, No. 12, pp. 227-266, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1203_1
  88. Taboada, M., Modeling task-oriented dialogue, Computers and the Humanities. Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 431-454, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025729107628
  89. Taggart, W.R., The NASA/UT/FAA Line/LOS checklist: Assessing system safety and crew performance. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1995.
  90. Te'eni, D., Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 251-312, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250931
  91. USNRC, NRC action plan developed as a result of the TMI-2 Accident (NUREG-0660), Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1980.
  92. USNRC, Operator licensing examiner standards (NUREG-1021), Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1989.
  93. Valacich, J.S. and Schwenk. C., Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 158-173, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1070
  94. Visciola, M. and Armando, A., Communication patterns and error in flight simulation, Reliability engineering and system safety, 36, 252-259, 1992.
  95. Walther, J.B., Relationship aspects of computer-mediated communication : Experimental observations over time, Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.186-203, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
  96. Wickens, C.D., Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. New York, NY; Harper Collins, 1992.
  97. Wickens, C.D., Gordon, S.E. and Liu, Y., An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. New York, NY: Longman, 1998.
  98. Wigdor, A.K. and Green, B.F., Jr., Performance assessment for the workplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
  99. Williams, S.M., Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0204_2
  100. Williges, R. and Wierwille, W.W., Behavioral measures of aircrew mental workload. Human Factors, 21, 549-574, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087902100503