Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Human Factors Evaluations of Alarm Displays in Main Control Rooms

  • Choe, Pilsung (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University)
  • Received : 2013.01.21
  • Accepted : 2013.01.30
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study proposes an alarm display and compares it with the one(alarm tile display) widely used in main control rooms(MCRs) of nuclear power plants. Background: Catching up with the rapid development of computer technologies, advanced MCRs has been required. Using modern technologies of computers and visual displays, we have a lot of potential to improve user performance and satisfaction as well as safety in MCRs. Method: The alarm bar display has been proposed to reduce some potential problems of the alarm tile display in this study. Human factors evaluations were conducted to compare both types of displays. Two interfaces of bar alarm and tile alarm were simulated on the desktop computer for the user-involved experiment. Eight students participated in the experiment with the within-subject design. Results: The alarm bar was slightly better in terms of situation awareness, and preferred to understand alarm dynamics. The alarm tile was slightly or significantly better in other measures. Conclusion: Both alarm displays have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, combining benefits of both displays can be used to optimize the design of alarm displays. Application: The proposed display is expected to compensate the existing displays for certain purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, G., Applied Spatial Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
  2. Brown, W., O'Hara, J. and Higgins, J., Advanced alarm systems: guidance development and technical basis, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000, http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003770903.pdf (retrieved November 26, 2012).
  3. Bullemer, P.T., Tolsma, M., Reising, D.V.C. and Laberge, J.C., Towards improving operator alarm flood responses-alternative alarm presentation techniques, Abnormal Situation Management Consortium, 2011, http://www.asmconsortium.net/Documents/Towards%20Improving %20Alarm%20Flood%20Response_BullemerTolsmaReisingLaberge _2011ISA_final.pdf (retrieved November 25, 2012).
  4. Carvalho, P.V.R., Santos, I.L.D., Gomes, J.O., Borges, M.R.S. and Guerlain, S., Human factors approach for evaluation and redesign of humansystem interfaces of a nuclear power plant simulator, Displays, 29(3), 273-284, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.08.010
  5. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.S., Park, J.K., Heo, G. and Kim, H.G., Development of an advanced human-machine interface for next generation nuclear power plants, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 64, 109-126, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00073-8
  6. Cheon, S.W., Chang, S.H. and Chung, H.Y., Development strategies of an expert system for multiple alarm processing and diagnosis in nuclear power plants, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 40(1), 21-30, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.199483
  7. Choi, S.S., Park, J.K., Hong, J.H., Kim, H.G., Chang, S.H. and Kang, K.S., Development strategies of an intelligent human-machine interface for next generation nuclear power plants, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 43, 2096-2114, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.502304
  8. Endsley, M.R., "Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement", Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, (pp. 97-101), Santa Monica. CA. 1988.
  9. Fitch, K.R., Tcl/Tk-based Alarm Presentation System, Tcl/Tk,, http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2002/archive/Tcl2002papers/fitch-aps/ aps_paper.pdf, (retrieved November 1, 2012).
  10. Flach, J., Hancock, P., Caird, J. and Vicente, K.J., Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1995.
  11. Gordon, P. and Anderson, T., "Alarm presentation system (APS) at Ringhals nuclear power plant unit 2", American Nuclear Society 4th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Machine Interface Technology, (pp. 311-321), Columbus. OH. 2004.
  12. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E., Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload, North Holland Press, 139-183, 1988.
  13. Lehto, M.R. and Buck, J.R., Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics for Engineers, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008.
  14. Mattiasson, C., The alarm system from the operator's perspective. International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, (pp. 217-221), 1999.
  15. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M. and Minocha, S. User Interface Design and Evaluation, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2005.
  16. Tuszynski, J., Larsson, J.E., Nihlwing, C., Ohman, B. and Calzada, A., "A pilot project on alarm reduction and presentation based on multilevel flow models", Proceedings of the Enlarged Halden Programme Group Meeting, Storefjell, Gol. Norway. 2002.
  17. Zwaga, H.J.G. and Hoonhout, H.C.M., Supervisory control behaviour and the implementation of alarms in process control. In N.A. Stanton (Ed), Human Factors in Alarm Design, (pp. 119-134), Taylor & Francis, 1994.