DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Oh, Jun-Hyok (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Changhoon (Department of Preventive Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Jinhee (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jin Hee (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Mi Jin (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hye Won (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Jung Hyun (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Han Cheol (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Cha, Kwang Soo (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Hong, Taek Jong (Department of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
  • Published : 2013.08.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives: It was demonstrated that the fractional flow reserve (FFR) with partial balloon obstruction may have implications for assessing viable myocardium. In a different way, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was introduced as a useful indicator for assessing microvascular function. We evaluated the relationship between the $FFR_{0.8}$ and the IMR. Subjects and Methods: We studied 48 consecutive patients who had undergone coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). After revascularization using stent(s), an undersized short balloon was positioned inside the stent and inflated to create a specific normalized pressure drop of FFR (distal coronary/aortic pressure=0.80) at rest. The $FFR_{0.8}$ was obtained during hyperemia with the fixed state balloon-induced partial obstruction. IMR was measured by three injections of saline. The association between the $FFR_{0.8}$ and the IMR was investigated. Results: The mean age of the patients was $60{\pm}12$ years and 36 (75%) overall presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The mean $FFR_{0.8}$ was $0.68{\pm}0.06$. A statistically significant correlation between the $FFR_{0.8}$ and the log-transformed $IMR_{true}$ ($LnIMR_{true}$) was found through a multivariable linear regression analysis (${\beta}=0.056$, p<0.001). Both the $FFR_{0.8}$ and the $LnIMR_{true}$ had a positive correlation with the log-transformed peak troponin I (TnI) with statistical significance ($r^2=0.119$, p=0.017; $r^2=0.225$, p=0.006, respectively). Conclusion: There was a positive correlation between the $LnIMR_{true}$ and the $FFR_{0.8}$. Both of the values were associated with peak TnI. Those values may be used as appropriate surrogate measures of microvascular function after AMI.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhang Z, Takarada S, Molloi S. Quantification of coronary microvascular resistance using angiographic images for volumetric blood flow measurement: in vivo validation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;300:H2096-104. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01123.2010
  2. Kitabata H, Imanishi T, Kubo T, et al. Coronary microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of the transmural extent of infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation anterior acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:263-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.013
  3. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-32. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1
  4. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, et al. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 2004;109:2269-72. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000128669.99355.CB
  5. McGeoch R, Watkins S, Berry C, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:715-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.009
  6. Lim HS, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, et al. Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2854-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp313
  7. Kim JH, Park JH, Choo K, et al. Pressure-wire based assessment of microvascular resistance using calibrated upstream balloon obstruction: a predictor of myocardial viability. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:581-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23277
  8. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2551-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184
  9. Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:281-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054
  10. Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109:1121-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000118496.44135.A7
  11. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001;104:157-62. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.104.2.157
  12. Kocaman SA, Sahinarslan A, Arslan U, Timurkaynak T. The delta fractional flow reserve can predict lesion severity and long-term prognosis. Atherosclerosis 2009;203:178-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.06.009
  13. Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, et al. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation 2004;110:2137-42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000143893.18451.0E
  14. Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:560-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.062
  15. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation 2001;104:2003-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.099223