DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do Social Responsibility Impact on Social Economy in Sustainable Factors?

친환경 요소 중 공공의 사회적 책임감이 사회경제 가치관에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2013.05.25

Abstract

The design, construction, use and demolition of building generate substantial social and economic benefits to society but may also have serious negative impacts especially for the environment. In response to the demand for evaluation and management of buildings' environmental performance, several tools and methodologies have been developed and are being implemented in the construction sector aiming at sustainable performance. The research work is focusing on environmental management tools emphasizing to rating systems' analysis, comparison and implementation for buildings' environmental performance. The LEED, SBT07, CASBEE and KGBC guides for existing buildings and new construction are compared, similarities and differences are analysed and a joint evaluation guide for existing buildings derived as a result of the rating systems' analysis. Finally all the components for certification are researched by citizens in Korea and analyzed their sustainable preference and impacts of social responsibility on social economy. The results gained by this research suggested an appropriate way to make a more effective certifying plan and weighting factors according to analyze various citizens' preference of certain certification sectors.

Keywords

References

  1. Hilary I. Inyang, Journal of Energy Engineering, volume 135, Number 1, Coden: JLEED9, ISSN 0773-9402
  2. 임정아외 2인, 공동주택 관리 영역 구분에 의한 친환경 성능평가 도구의 가중치 분석, 대한건축학회논문집 제25권제1호, 2009. 1
  3. McKeown,R.,Hopkins, C.A., and Chrystalbridge,M. 2002 Education for sustainable Debelopment Toolkit(version2). Available: http://www.esdtoolkit.org/about.htm [Accessed June 2008]
  4. Meadows.D.H.(1972). The limits to growth : a report for The club of Rome's Project on the predicament of mankind. Earth Island Limited, London. URL: www.clubofrome.org
  5. Douglas, A. et al.(2004). Corporate social reporting in Irish financial institutions. In: The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16, 6, pp. 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780410563301
  6. McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and Society. Mc Graw-Hill, New York
  7. Jensen, Michael and William Meckling. (1986). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Putterman, Louis edited. The Economic Nature of the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Friedman, Milton. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 133
  9. Nader, Ralph and Mark J. Green edited. 1973. Corporate Power in America. New York: Grossman.
  10. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance.
  11. Carroll, Archie. (1991). "The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders". Business Horizons (July/August) : pp. 39-48.
  12. Wood, D.(1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. In: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, 4, pp. 691-718
  13. WBCSD (2001) Corporate Social Responsibility.
  14. Ralws, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Boston: Havard University Press, ${\S}{\S}$4, 9.
  15. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2003). OECD Observer. Paris: OECD
  16. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. A Key Corporate Responsibility Instrument. OECD Observer. Paris: OECD. pp. 1-2.
  17. OECD. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment. Development and Corporate Responsibility.
  18. OECD. (2001). Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals. Paris.
  19. OECD. (2001). The OECD Guideline & Other Corporate Responsibility Instruments : A Comparison. Paris : OECD.
  20. Galliano, Renato. (2003). "Social Economy, Entrepreneurship and Local Development". European Association of Development Agencies. Distributed at the OECD, LEED Conference on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development in Distressed Urban Areas. Rome. Italy. pp. 7-8.
  21. Paul Shrivastava. (1995). The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), pp. 936-960