Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic Response of Steel Plate Girder Bridges by the KL-510 Load

KL-510 하중에 의한 강판형교의 동적응답

  • Received : 2013.09.30
  • Accepted : 2013.10.17
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dynamic response of steel plate girder bridges by KL-510 design truck in KHBDC considering the road surface roughness of bridges and bridge-vehicle interaction is investigated. Simply supported steel plate girder bridges with span length of 20m, 30m, and 40m from "Standard Highway Bridge Superstructure" published by the Korean Ministry of Construction are used for a bridge model, and ten sets of the road surface roughness of bridge deck are generated from power spectral density (PSD) function by assuming the roadway as "Average Road". A three dimensionally modeled 5-axle tractor-trailer with its gross weight, which is the same as that of KL-510 design truck, is used for dynamic analysis. For the finite element modeling of superstructure, beam element for the main girder, shell element for the concrete deck, and rigid link between main girder and concrete deck are used. Impact factor and DLA of steel plate girder bridges for different span are calculated by the proposed numerical analysis model and compared with those specified by several bridge codes.

본 연구에서는 교량의 노면조도 및 교량과 차량 사이의 상호작용을 고려한 수치해석방법을 사용하여 도로교설계기준에 규정된 표준트럭 하중인 KL-510에 의한 강판형교의 동적응답을 연구하였다. 대상교량은 건설부에서 제정한 "도로교 상부구조 표준도"에 수록되어 있는 지간이 20m, 30m와 40m인 단순 강판형교를 사용하고. "보통의 도로"에 대하여 생성시킨 10개의 노면조도를 사용하였다. 차량은 5축 트랙터-트레일러인 표준트럭하중 KL-510을 3차원 차량으로 모델링하고, 교량은 주형을 보요소로, 콘크리트 바닥판은 쉘요소로, 주형과 콘크리트 바닥판 사이는 Rigid Link를 사용하여 3차원으로 모델링하였다. 이와 같은 노면조도 및 차량을 사용하여 강판형교의 충격계수와 DLA를 구하고 각국의 설계기준과 비교 검토하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2010.
  2. AASHTO, Standard of Specification for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition. 2002.
  3. ASCE, Impact Factor on Highway Bridges. Final Report of the Special Committee on the Impact in Highway Bridges. ASCE Transactions, 95, 1931, pp.1089-1117.
  4. Bahkt, B. and Pinjakar, S. G., Review of Dynamic Testing of Highway Bridges, SRR-89-01, MTO, Downsview Ontario, Canada, 1989.
  5. Biggs, J. M., Introduction to Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1982.
  6. Billing, J. R., Dynamic Test of Bridges in Ontario, 1980 : Data Capture, Test Procedure and Data Processing, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, Research and Development Report, Vol. 26, 1982.
  7. CAN/CSA, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, CSA International, Toronto, Canada, 2000.
  8. Cantieni, R., Dynamic Load Tests on Highway Bridges in Switzerland, Swiss Federal Laboratories of Material Testing and Research, Report No. 211, Dubendorf, Switzerland, 1983.
  9. Chung, T. J., "Dynamic Analysis of Highway Bridges by 3-D. Vehicle Model Considering Tire Enveloping", KSCE, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2006, pp.989-999 (in Korean).
  10. Chung, T. J., Shin, D. K. and Park, Y. S., "Dynamic Response of Steel Plate Girder Bridges by Numerical Dynamic Analysis", KSCE, Vol. 28, No. 1A, 2008, pp.33-49 (in Korean).
  11. Dodds, C. J. and Robson, J. D., "The Description of Road Surface Roughness", Journal of the Sound and Vibration, Vol. 31, No. 12, 1973, pp.175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80373-6
  12. Euro Code, EUROCODE 1-Action on structures, Part 2 : Traffic loads on bridges, EN 1991-2, European Committee for Standardization, 1991.
  13. Fryba, L., Vibration of Solid and Structures Under Moving Loads, Noordhoff International Publishing, 1970.
  14. Huang, T., Dynamic Response of Three-Span Continuous Highway Bridge, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinoise, IL, 1960.
  15. Hwang, E. S., Dynamic Loads for Girder Bridges, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, 1990.
  16. Japan Road Association, Japan Highway Bridge Specification, 2002.
  17. Koh, H. M. etc, R&D on Core Technology for Bridge Design : Advancement of Bridge Analysis : Final Report, Seoul National University, 2009 (in Korean).
  18. Korean Road and Transportation Association, Korea Highway Bridge Design Code (Limit State Design), sponsored by Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2012.
  19. Korean Road and Transportation Association, Korea Highway Bridge Design Code, sponsored by Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010.
  20. Ministry of Construction, Standard Highway Bridge Supper Structure, 1979.
  21. Mulcahy, N. L., "Bridge Response With Tractor-Trailer Vehicle Loading", Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 11, 1983, pp.649-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110505
  22. O'Connor, C. and Prichard, R. W., "Impact Studies on Small Composite Girder Bridges", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 3, 1985, pp.641-653. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:3(641)
  23. OHBDC, Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, Highway Engineering Division, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications Downsview, Ontario, Canada, 1983.
  24. SIA, Schweizer Norm, SIA, Switzerland, 1985.
  25. Wang, T., Huang, D. and Shahawy, M., "Dynamic Response of Multi-Girder Bridges", Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. ST8, 1982, pp.2222-2238.

Cited by

  1. Dynamic Response of Short-Span Highway Bridges on Local Road by Vehicle Type vol.31, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2019.31.5.321