DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

양측성 유방암의 세기조절방사선치료(IMRT)와 부피적조절회전방사선치료(VMAT)의 비교연구

A Dosimetric Comparision of IMRT and VMAT in Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

  • 김성진 (을지대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 윤선민 (을지대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 김성규 (영남대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실)
  • Kim, Sung-Jin (Department of Radiation Oncology, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Youn, Seon-Min (Department of Radiation Oncology, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sung Kyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2013.12.12
  • 심사 : 2013.12.14
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31

초록

양측성 유방암 환자를 대상으로 부피적 조절회전방사선치료와 세기조절방사선치료의 선량학적 결과를 비교하여 효율적인 치료방법을 제시함을 목적으로 한다. 5명의 환자를 대상으로 8개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료와 12개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료, 1회전 부피적 조절회전방사선치료 계획을 수립하였다. 그 결과를 DVH 분석을 통해 선량학적으로 비교분석하였다. PTV의 평균선량과 $D_{98}$을 보면 12-IMRT가 $51.04{\pm}0.57$ Gy (오른쪽), $50.80{\pm}1.07$ Gy (왼쪽), $42.94{\pm}16.16$ Gy (오른쪽), $42.56{\pm}2.09$ Gy (왼쪽)로 우수한 경향을 보인다. HI와 $CI_{90,95}$에서도 12-IMRT가 우수한 결과를 보였다. 중요장기에서는 세치료계획 모두 우수한 결과를 보였지만 12-IMRT에서 가장 낮은 선량을 보였다. 12-IMRT가 PTV와 OAR의 선량학적측면에서 우수한 결과를 보여주었다.

A study was performed comparing dosimetric characteristics of volumetric modulated arc and intensity modulated radiatio therapy on patients with bilateral breast cancer. For 5 patients, 3 plans were made for each patient; IMRT beams 8 and 12 of the beam intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy plan. The average PTVs volumes and $D_{98}$ for 12-IMRT were $51.04{\pm}0.57$ Gy (right), $50.80{\pm}1.07$ Gy (left), $42.94{\pm}16.16$ Gy (right), $42.56{\pm}2.09$ Gy (left). HI ($D_5{\sim}D_{95}$) and $CI_{90,95}$, even 12-IMRT has shown excellent results. In OAR, 3 plans showed excellent results. But the lowest dose of 12-IMRT. 12-IMRT achieved similar PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk than 8-IMRT and VMAT.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al: Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 333(22):1456-1461 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199511303332203
  2. Fogliataa A, Nicolinia G, Alberb M, et al: IMRT for breast. A planning study. Radiother Oncol 76(3):300-310 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.08.004
  3. Nicolini G, Clivio A, Fogliata A, et al: Simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for bilateral breast: a treatment planning and dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc and fixed field intensity modulated therapy. Rad Oncol 4(1):27 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-27
  4. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group: Intensity modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 51(4):880-917 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01749-7
  5. Otto K: Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 35(1):310-317 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2818738
  6. Semenenko VA, Reitzet B, et al: Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system. Med Phys 35(12):5851-5860 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3013556
  7. Lafond C, Gassa F, Odin C, et al: Comparison between two treatment planning systems for volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization for prostate cancer. Eur J Med Phys 30(1):1-8 (2013)
  8. Martha MM, Di Y, Inga G, Alvaro M: Clinical applications of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 77(2):608-616 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.032
  9. Clivio A, Fogliata A, Franzetti-Pellanda A, et al: Volumetricmodulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the anal canal: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol 92(1):118-124 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.020
  10. Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, et al: Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in headandneck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(1):252-259 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.033