Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Critical Point and Significance in the Notion of Rem Koolhaas's Bigness

렘 콜하스의 Bigness 개념의 한계와 의의

  • Published : 2013.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the critical point and significance of Rem Koolhaas's notion of Bigness as contemporary architectural discourse in the age of Global city. Koolhaas captures precisely the congestion and complexity of comtemporary architecture. Bigness is a concept that will deal with how to intervene in these situations, the influence of a variety of architectural and urban phenomenon. Divisive situation by exploring the relationship of these changes in behavior and the physical space and the relationship of architecture and urban, Bigness penetrated the answer, he puts out. However, in order to precede the retracted and removed to accommodate the complex and chaotic, it becomes a city, Bigness deny the actual city. Therefore Bigness itself clearly reveals the situation of chaos and division to strengthen the role of the limits of the location on the border.

Keywords

References

  1. O.M.A. Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau, S, M, L, XL, The Monacelli Press. 1995
  2. Sanford Kwinter, ed. Rem Koolhaas conversation with students, 봉일범 역, 렘 콜하스 학생들과의 대화, MGH Architecture Books, 2000
  3. Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan, 김원갑 역, 정신착란증의 뉴욕, 태림문화사, 1998
  4. Assemblage, No.27, MIT Press, 1995
  5. Sanford Kwinter, Politics and Pastoralism, Assemblage, No.27, Tulane Papers:The Politics of contemporary Architectural Discourse(Aug.,1995), pp.25-32
  6. Mark Rakatansky, Mario Gandelsonas and Sanford Kwinter, Assembly 1, Assemblage, No.27, Tulane Papers:The Politics of contemporary Architectural Discourse(Aug.,1995), pp.33-40
  7. Kate Nesbitt ed., Theorizing a new Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory, 건축이론 1965-1995 (2), 최학종 역, Spacetime. 2007
  8. Jorge otero-Pailos, Bigness in context: Some regressive tendencies in Rem Koolhaas' urban theory, City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 4:3, pp.379-389
  9. Tom Avermaete, Klaske Havik, Hans Teerds ed., Architecture, Modernity and the Public Sphere, 건축, 근대성과 공공영역에 대한 36인의 건축적 입장들, 권영민 역, Spacetime, 2011