Health Behavior Motivators about Quit-Smoking in Some Outpatients of University Hospitals

일부 병원 내원 환자의 금연에 관한 건강행위 동기요소

  • Koong, Hwa-Soo (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Medical Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Ryu, Seung-Mi (Department of Nursing, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soo-Jeong (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Medical Science, Konyang University)
  • 궁화수 (건양대학교 의과학대학 치위생학과) ;
  • 유승미 (충남대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 황수정 (건양대학교 의과학대학 치위생학과)
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the motivators of smoking in 300 subjects using convenient extraction in one hospital. After informed consent, the survey that consisted of general characteristics, health behavior, stage of change, health behavior-related-perceived benefit, health behavior-related-perceived barrier, health behavior-related-family support, oral health behavior, subjective oral health and others was carried out. The smoking rate was higher in case of male (sex), high school graduates (education) and 2~3 million Korean won (KRW) (monthly income). The present smokers responded lower oral health behavior (p<0.001), lower health behavior-related-perceived benefit (p=0.021), higher health behavior- related-perceived barrier (p<0.001) and lower stage of change (p<0.001). The oral health related variables were not influenced by smoking. In logistic regression model, odds ratios in smoking were 0.378 in below average (health behavior-related-perceived barrier), 4.746 in below average (stage of change), 12.743 in male (sex) and 3.271 in 2~3 million KRW (monthly income/standard : over 3 million KRW). It was suggested that oral health related manpower should take account of not only smoking-related oral health but also motivators of smoking as to deliver effective no-smoking program.

본 연구는 한림대학교 성심병원과 충남대학교 병원 심혈관센터를 방문한 환자 중 본 연구에 대해 자발적으로 동의한 40대 이상 300명을 대상으로 하여 흡연 여부와 관련된 동기요소를 파악하고자 설문조사를 실시하고 분석하였다. 1. 흡연자율은 성별, 최종학력, 월수입에 따라 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 남자, 고등학교 졸업자, 월수입 200만원대인 대상자의 흡연율이 높았다. 2. 흡연군은 비흡연군이나 금연군에 비해 건강행위에 대한 지각된 유익성은 유의하게 낮고(p=0.021) 지각된 장애성은 더 높았다(p<0.001). 흡연군은 건강행위에 있어서는 생활방식, 건강습관 등을 실천하지 않으며(p<0.001), 변화단계에서는 비흡연군과 금연군이 행동단계 이상이나 흡연군은 준비단계에 위치하였다(p<0.001). 3. 흡연 여부에 따라 주관적 구강건강인식, 치은출혈 여부, 1일 잇솔질 횟수, 치과방문은 차이가 나지 않았다. 4. 건강행위에 대한 지각된 장애가 평균 미만인 군이 OR이 0.378 (p=0.039)이고 변화단계가 평균 미만인 군은 OR이 4.746 (p=0.002)이었다. 남성이 흡연할 OR은 12.743 (p<0.001)이었고, 경제상태에서는 월수입이 200만원대인 군이 300만원 이상인 군에 비해 OR이 3.271 (p=0.045)이었다. 따라서, 금연에 대한 동기요소를 변화시키기 위해 건강행위에 대한 유익성, 장애성, 실천 등을 변화시킬 수 있는 금연교육프로그램이 필요하며 구강보건관련인력도 흡연과 연관된 구강건강 관리뿐 아니라 동기요소를 변화시킬 수 있는 금연 유도 프로그램을 개발하고 이용해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Law for the Promotion of Nation's Health: Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.law.go.kr(2012, December 8).
  2. Millar WJ, Locker D: Smoking and oral health status. J Can Dent Assoc 73: 155a-155g, 2007.
  3. Tomar SL, Asma S: Smoking-attributable periodontitis in the United States: findings from NHANES III. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Periodontol 71: 743-751, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.743
  4. Hwang SJ, Kim YK, Yang SJ, Cho HJ: Influence of smoking on matrix metalloproteinase-9 in the gingival crevicular fluid. J Dent Hyg Sci 11: 339-344, 2011.
  5. Albert D, Ward A: Tobacco cessation in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am 56: 747-770, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2012.07.004
  6. Carr AB, Ebbert J: Interventions for tobacco cessation in the dental setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 13: CD005084.
  7. Hwang JM, Kim EG, Park YD, Han JY: A study on effective smoking cessation policy of smoker patients. J Dent Hyg Sci 13: 77-82, 2013.
  8. Rosseel JP, Jacobs JE, Plasschaert AJ, Grol RP: A review of strategies to stimulate dental professionals to integrate smoking cessation interventions into primary care. Community Dent Health 29: 154-161, 2012.
  9. Park SW: Evidence-based smoking cessation counseling: motivational intervention and relapse prevention. J Korean Med Assoc 54: 1036-1046, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.10.1036
  10. Haq MB, Griffin M: Health motivation: key to health promoting behavior? Nurse Pract 21: 155-156, 1996.
  11. Balbach ED, Smith EA, Malone RE: How the health belief model helps the tobacco industry: individuals, choice, and information. Tob Control 15: 37-43, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.014621
  12. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO: Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addict Behav 7: 133-142, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90038-7
  13. Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR: Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J Pers 62: 119-142, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
  14. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K: Health behavior and health education: theory research and practice. 4th ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp.45-62, 2008.
  15. Seo MI, Hah YS: A study of factors influencing on health promoting lifestyle in the elderly-application of pender's health promotion model. J Korean Acad Nurs 34: 1288-1297, 2004.
  16. Cobb S: Presidential address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med 38: 300-314, 1976.
  17. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8872.pdf?new_window=1(2002).
  18. Hong YM, Lee CY, Lee KH, Bae SH, Ham OK, Han JH: Predicting adolescents' smoking behavior using health belief model. J Korean Public Health Nurs 18: 218-224, 2004.
  19. Jeon HJ. The study of smoker's no-smoking decision and success factors-the implications of no-smoking policy. Korean Soc Secur Stud 29: 89-103, 2013.
  20. Lee HS: A study on the effects of vocational high school students' smoking cessation program operation-focused on the transtheoretical model. J Korean Public Health Nurs 18: 205-217, 2004.
  21. Korea Health Promotion Foundation: 2013 Healthcare center no-smoking clinic counseling manual. Korea Health Promotion Foundation, Seoul, pp.40-41, 2013.
  22. Lee HO, Song JY: A study on oral health behavior according to the appearance of smoking experience in some middle school students. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 516-524, 2012.