Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multidisciplinary Team Research as an Innovation Engine in Knowledge-Based Transition Economies and Implication for Asian Countries -From the Perspective of the Science of Team Science

  • Lee, Yong-Gil (Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Inha University)
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This work identifies the key factors influencing the success of multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and trans-disciplinary R&D projects in transition economies by integrating knowledge management, organizational, inter/intra-collaboration (open-innovation), and leadership perspectives, while also addressing the perspective of the science of team science, which is an integrative approach to R&D. This is followed by providing the major sub-constructs of team science and policy implications to better facilitate multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary R&D projects in knowledge-based transition economies.

Keywords

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1994). Good Communication That Blocks Learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77-85.
  2. Bettencourt, L. A., A. W. Ulwick (2008). The Customer-Centered Innovation Map. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 109-114.
  3. Cohn, J., J. Katzenbach, and G. Valk (2008). Finding and Grooming Breakthrough Innovators. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 63-69.
  4. Collins, J. (2005). Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 136-143.
  5. Dzisah, J. & Henry Etzkowitz (2009). Triple Helix Circulation: The Heart of Innovation and Development. The 7th Triple Helix conference theme paper, pp. 1-19. Glasgow, 17-19 June.
  6. Ericsson, K. A., M. J. Prietula, E. T. Cokely (2007). The Making of an Expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 115-121.
  7. Eckert, R. A. (2001). Where Leadership Starts. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 53-61.
  8. Faems, D., B. Van Looy, K. Debackere (2005). Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
  9. Gabriel, I. (1999). Giving meaning to work: the spiritual challenge of our time. The Third Inter-national Symposium on Catholic Social Thought and Management Education, Rethinking the Spiritual and Social Life within Business, International Centre, Dona Paula, Goa, India, January 10-12, pp.1-8.
  10. Garnier, J.-P. (2008). Rebuilding the R&D Engine in Big Pharma. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 69-76.
  11. Goffee, R & Gareth Jones (2000). Why Should Anyone Be Led by You. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 62-70.
  12. Goleman, D. (1998). What Makes a Leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 93-102.
  13. Gray, B. (2008). Enhancing Transdisciplinary Research Through Collaborative Leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S124 - S132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.037
  14. Hansen, M. T., J. Birkinshaw (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121-130.
  15. Heifetz, R. A. & Marty Linsky (2002). A Survival Guide for Leaders. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 65-74.
  16. Huang, J. C., S. Newell (2003). Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00091-1
  17. Huckman, R. S. (2009). Are You Having Trouble Keeping Your Operations Focused? Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 91-95.
  18. Jones, B. F., S. Wuchty, B. Uzzi (2008). Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science, 322, 1259-1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357
  19. Jouret, G. (2009). Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 43-45.
  20. Katila, R., G. Ahuja (2002). Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  21. Kim, W.C., R. Mauborgne (2009). How Strategy Shapes Structure. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 73-80.
  22. Koput K. W. (1997). A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions. Organization Science, 8(5) 528-542. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.5.528
  23. Kotter, J. P. (1990). What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business Review, 79(11): 85-96.
  24. Laursen, K., A. Salter (2006). Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  25. Lee, K. & C. Lim (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00088-3
  26. Lee, Y.-G. (2012). Strengthening Competency Linkage to Innovation at Korean Universities, Scientomertics, 90(1), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0497-4
  27. Lee, Y.-G., J.-H. Lee (2010). Different characteristics between auctioned and non-auctioned patents, Scientometrics, 82(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0029-7
  28. Lee, Y.-G. (2010). Sectoral strategic differences of technological development between electronics and chemistry: A historical view from analyses of Korean-invented US patents during the period of 1989 to 1992, Scientometrics, 82(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0052-8
  29. Lee, Y.-G., S. Park, Y. Song (2009). Which is Better for a Firm's Financial Performance: An Externally Oriented or Inwardly Oriented Innovation Strategy? An Empirical Study of Korean SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 17 (1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2009.9668666
  30. Lee, Y.-G. (2009). What Affects a Patent's Value? An Analysis of Variables That Affect Technological, Direct Economic, and Indirect Economic Value: An Exploratory Conceptual Approach. Scientometrics, 79 (3), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2020-5
  31. Lee, Y.-G., J. Lee, Y. Song, H. Kim (2008). Technological convergence and open innovation in the mobile telecommunications industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 16 (1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2008.9668646
  32. Masse, L. C., R. P. Moser, D. Stokols, B. K. Taylor, S. E. Marcus, G. D. Morgan, K. L. Hall, R. T. Groyle, W. M. Trochim (2008). Measuring Collaboration and Transdisciplinary Integration in Team Science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S151 - S160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020
  33. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The Manager's Job- Folklore and Fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163-176.
  34. Mintzberg, H. (2007). Productivity Is Killing American Enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 25.
  35. Mizik, N., R. Jacobson (2007). The Cost of Myopic Management. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 22-24.
  36. Nambisan, S., M. Sawhney (2007). A Buyer's Guide to the Innovation Bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109-118.
  37. Nidumolu, R., C. K. Prahalad, M. R. Rangawami (2009). Why Sustainability Is Now The Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 57-64.
  38. Park, S.-h., Y.-G. Lee (2011). Perspectives on Technology Transfer Strategies of Korean Companies in Point of Resource and Capability Based View, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(1), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000100013
  39. Peace, W. H. (1991). The Hard Work of Being a Soft Manager. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 40-44.
  40. Peters, T. J. (1979). Leadership: Sad Facts and Silver Linings. Harvard Business Review, 57(6), 164-172.
  41. Porth, S. J., J. McCall (1999). Contemporary Management Theories and Catholic Social Teaching: A Review and Analysis. The Third International Symposium on Catholic Social Thought and Management Education, Rethinking the Spiritual and Social Life within Business, International Centre, Dona Paula, Goa, India, January 10-12, pp.1-15.
  42. Sengupta, K., T. K. Abdel-Hamid, L. K. Van Wassenhove (2008). The Experience Trap. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 94-101.
  43. Song, Y., D. Lee, Y.-G. Lee, Y. Chung (2007). Managing uncertainty and ambiguity in frontier R&D projects: A Korean case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.05.001
  44. Sorcher, M., Brant, J. (2002). Are You Picking the Right Leaders? Harvard Business Review, 80(2), 78-85.
  45. Stokols, D., S. Misra, R. P. Moser, K. L. Hall, B. K. Taylor (2008). The Ecology of Team Science: Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S96 - S115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
  46. Takeuchi, H., E. Osono, and N. Shimizu (2008). The Contradictions That Drive Toyota's Success. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 96-104.
  47. Teasley, S., S. Wolinsky (2001). Scientific Collaborations at a Distance. Science, 292(5525), 2254-2255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1061619
  48. Tripsas, M. (1997). Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction: Complementary Asset and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S
  49. Zahra, S. A., A. P. Nielsen (2002). Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229
  50. Zaleznik, A. (1992). Managers and Leaders: Are They Different? Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 126-135.

Cited by

  1. Measuring the dynamics of an innovation system using patent data: a case study of South Korea, 2001–2010 vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0045-4
  2. Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: focused on non-quality factors vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0110-z
  3. A semantic annotation framework for scientific publications vol.51, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0369-3
  4. Knowledge flow in China’s humanities and social sciences pp.1573-7845, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0539-y