Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Customer Satisfaction Indices Using Different Methods of Weight Calculation

가중치 산출방법에 따른 고객만족도지수의 비교

  • 이상준 (세명대학교 교양과정부) ;
  • 김용태 (단국대학교 응용통계학과) ;
  • 김성윤 (동국대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2013.10.21
  • Accepted : 2013.12.20
  • Published : 2013.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study compares Customer Satisfaction Index(CSI) and the weight for each dimension by applying various methods of weight calculation and attempts to suggest some implications. For the purpose, the study classified the methods of weight calculation into the subjective method and the statistical method. Constant sum scale was used for the subjective method, and the statistical method was again segmented into correlation analysis, principal component analysis, factor analysis, structural equation model. The findings showed that there is difference between the weights from the subjective method and the statistical method. The order of the weights by the analysis methods were classified with similar patterns. Besides, the weight for each dimension by different methods of weight calculation showed considerable deviation and revealed the difference of discrimination and stability among the dimensions. Lastly, the CSI calculated by various methods of weight calculation showed to be the highest in structural equation model, followed by in the order of regression analysis, correlation analysis, arithmetic mean, principal component analysis, constant sum scale and factor analysis. The CSI calculated by each method showed to have statistically significant difference.

본 연구는 다양한 가중치 산출방법을 적용하여 각 차원별 가중치 및 고객만족도지수를 비교하고 시사점을 밝혀보고자 한다. 이를 위해 가중치 산출방법을 주관적 방법과 통계적 방법으로 구분하고, 다시 주관적 방법은 고정총합법, 그리고 통계적 방법은 상관분석, 회귀분석, 주성분분석, 요인분석, 구조방정식으로 세분화하였다. 연구결과 주관적 방법과 통계적 방법에 의한 가중치는 서로 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났고, 분석방법에 따른 가중치의 순위는 유사한 패턴으로 구분되었다. 그리고 가중치 산출방법에 따른 각 차원별 가중치는 큰 편차를 보여 차원간의 변별력 및 안정성에 차이를 나타냈다. 마지막으로 다양한 가중치 산출방법에 따른 고객만족도지수는 구조방정식, 회귀분석, 상관분석, 산술평균, 주성분분석, 고정총합법, 요인분석의 순으로 높게 나타났고, 각 방법론에 따른 고객만족도지수는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. G. Yoon, J. R. Koo, C. G. Choi, Customer Satisfaction. Korea Management Association, 1996.
  2. J. Y. Jung, J. R. Cho, A Study of Developing Customer Satisfaction Index(CSI) Used for Structural Equation Model(SEM) and Applications of Customers' Decision. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 85-97, 2003.
  3. K. J. Song, K. K. Seo, A Comparison Study on Satisfied Customer Reclassification Methods for Customer Satisfaction Management. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 139-144, 2013.
  4. S. B. Cho, K. Y. Kim, A Comparative Study on the KS-SQI, NCSI, and KCSI. Korean Journal of Hotel Administration, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 213-227, 2008.
  5. Y. J. Cho, Y. H. Kim, Hybrid Computing Method for Customer Satisfaction Index. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 43-55, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2006.19.1.043
  6. T. I. Kim, Weighting Methods in the Evaluation Model. Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 243-258, 1999.
  7. Y. J. Yi, A Theoretical Examination of Customer Satisfaction Research. Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 139-166, 2000.
  8. J. S. Lim, The Analysis of the Validity of Measures used for Measuring the Public Service Satisfaction Index. Ph.D. dissertation, Kyunghee University. 2003.
  9. W. S. Gim, Y. J. Kang, Criterion-related Validities of Indirect Measurements of Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 63-81, 1998.
  10. Heeler, Roger M, Okechuku, Chike, & Reid, Stan, Attribute Importance: Contrasting Measurements. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 60-63, 1979. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150875
  11. Neslin, Scott A. Linking Product Features to Perceptions: Self-stated versus Statistically Revealed Importance Weights. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.80-86, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151316
  12. H. S. Lee, J. H. Lim, Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Evaluation of NCSI and KCSI and Suggestions for Developing a New Index. Korea Marketing Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 137-160, 2005.
  13. K. H. Ahn, B. H. Lim, C. J. Kim, An Empirical Study of the Effect of Measurement Methods on the Correlation between Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention. Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 37-48, 2000.
  14. Y. C. Kim, J. S. Cha, Customer Satisfaction Measurement Tool and Its Strategic Application. Korea Marketing Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 113-132, 2003.
  15. E. S. Lee, H. C. Kang, Marketing Research Manual. Free Academy, 2011.
  16. A. L. Hwang, A Critical Study on the Public Service Survey Method. Journal of Governmental Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 32-56, 2003.