DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Failure Risk Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Sewer Pipes on Joint-Related Defects

원심력철근콘크리트관의 결함에 따른 심각도 평가 -이음부 사례를 중심으로-

  • 한상종 (한국건설기술연구원 환경연구실) ;
  • 신현준 (한국건설기술연구원 환경연구실) ;
  • 황환국 (한국건설기술연구원 환경연구실)
  • Received : 2013.10.14
  • Accepted : 2013.12.13
  • Published : 2013.12.15

Abstract

Sewer joint-related defect is one of the most common domestic sewer defects along with the lateral pipe problem. However, there are currently no criteria that precisely assess the joint-related sewer defects. Therefore, this study examined the joint-related sewer defects found in domestic circumstances, classified them according to the suggested defect code, and presented the examples of defect pictures. Each defect code was organized as the process of out of pipeline alignment (OPA) which shows the progress in deterioration. Each defect was classified into 5 grades depending on appropriate repair and rehabilitation method. The result of this study is expected to be useful for domestic CCTV inspectors to assess the sewer condition and helpful for managers to make a decision of repair and rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Ko, Y. I. (2001) Concrete pipes jointing methods, Sewerage Research Group in Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 111, pp. 121-130
  2. Yu, J. S. (2002) The origin and counterplan of sewer joints damage, Sewerage Research Group in Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 118, pp. 39-50
  3. Lee, Y. G (1995) the method and practice of sewer watertight test, Sewerage Research Group in Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, 53, pp. 327-345
  4. KWWA (2006) Management Manual for Sewerage construction, Korea Water and Wastewater Works Association
  5. KWWA (2011) Sewerage facility standards, Korea Water and Wastewater Works Association
  6. KSA (1996) KS F 4403 Reinforced spun concrete pipes, Korean Standards Association
  7. KSA (2001) KS F 4403 Reinforced spun concrete pipes, Korean Standards Association
  8. The Ministry of Environment (2011) The study on the standardization of sewer evaluation and the establishment of selection criteria for sewer repair and rehabilitation, The Ministry of Environment
  9. Moser. A.P., Folkman. S. (2008) Buried Pipe Design Third Edition, McGraw-Hill. pp 47-48
  10. NZWWA (2006) Pipe Inspection Manual Third edition, New Zealand Water & Wastewater Association, New Zealand
  11. WRc (2001) Sewerage Rehabilitation Manual 4th Edition, Water Research Center, UK
  12. WSAA (2008) Conduit Inspection Reporting Code of Australia 2nd Edition, Water Service Association of Australia, Australia

Cited by

  1. Comparison of two sewer condition assessment protocols in S. Korea vol.57, pp.60, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1151836
  2. Development of sewer condition assessment and rehabilitation decision-making program(SCARD) vol.29, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2015.29.1.123
  3. Risk analysis of road cave-in of storm sewer lateral using zoom camera vol.28, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2014.28.6.681
  4. Suggestion of the Domestic CCTV Inspection Sewer Pipe Defect Codeby Sewer Defect Frequency Analysis vol.30, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2016.30.6.623
  5. 대형 하수박스암거의 속성 데이터베이스 구축을 위한 결함유형 평가 vol.31, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2017.31.6.619