DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Multicenter Clinical Study on the Survival and Success Rates of Two Commercial Implants of Korea according to Loading Period

  • Yoon, Sung-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-In (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Chung, Kwang (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seunggon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chosun University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Seok (Apsun Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Cheoul (FM Dental Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Choon-Mo (Jeju Yena Dental Clinic)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.04
  • 심사 : 2013.12.17
  • 발행 : 2013.12.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival and success rates of Korean Osstem implants US II Plus, GS II following loading period. Materials and Methods: Dental records were obtained in total 201 patients who were treated with Korean Osstem implants US II Plus, GS II on both maxillary and mandibular anterior and posterior areas in six different clinics for 2 years from January 2007 to December 2008. Total 430 implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically using predefined success criteria prospectively and following results were obtained. Result: US II Plus, GS II implants showed high survival rates of more than 99% and high success rates more than 90% independent of loading period. As a result of cross analysis to evaluate clinical significance between implant loading period and success rate, the P-value of US II Plus was 0.10 (P>0.05), and the P-value of GS II was 0.17 (P>0.05), which showed no statistical significance. Bone quality, smoking, and edentulous state are factors that can affect the survival and success rates following differently loaded implants, but did not significantly affect in this study. Conclusion: These results suggest that selection of loading period of Korean Osstem implants US II Plus, GS II would be done carefully considering implant install area, the quality alveolar bone, the state of edentulous ridge and experience of operator, though they showed clinically good results on both maxillary and mandibular anterior and posterior areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, Duffort JF, Eller P, Justumus P, Marin P, Oscaby F, Simonet T, E, Brunel G. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 691-700.
  2. Degidi M, Piattelli A. Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 99-107.
  3. Cooper LF, Rahman A, Moriarty J, Chaffee N, Sacco D. Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 517-25.
  4. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Immediate loading of Branemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report. Implant Dent. 1997; 6: 83-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199700620-00002
  5. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977; 16: 1-132.
  6. Aparicio C, Rangert B, Sennerby L. Immediate/early loading of dental implants: a report from the Sociedad Espanola de Implantes World Congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003; 5: 57-60.
  7. Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ, Kwon JJ. How can improve the insufficient success rate at immediate loading? J Korean Dent Assoc. 2013; 51: 190-7.
  8. Weber HP, Morton D, Gallucci GO, Roccuzzo M, Cordaro L, Grutter L. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(suppl): 180-3.
  9. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8: 161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  10. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25.
  11. Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient selectino and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. pp. 199-209.
  12. Wagenberg BD, Ginsburg TR. Immediate implant placement on removal of the natural tooth: retrospective analysis of 1,081 implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22: 399-404, 406, 408 passim.
  13. Penarrocha M, Uribe R, Balaguer J. Immediate implants after extraction. A review of the current situation. Med Oral. 2004; 9: 234-42.
  14. Park HJ, Kook MS, Kim SG, Kim YK, Cho YS, Choi GL, Oh YH, Oh HK. Multicenter retrospective study of immediate two different RBM surfaced implant systems after extraction. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 30: 258-65.
  15. Lee JB, Wang YS, Shin KH, Hwang BN. Retrospective multicenter study of AVANA endosseous dental implant. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2000; 38: 558-66.
  16. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, Feldman SA, Weiner R, Phillips R, Gonshor A. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
  17. Martinez-Gonzalez JM, Barona-Dorado C, Cano-Sanchez J, Florez-Rodriguez M, Cantero-Alvarez M. Clinical and radiographic behaviour of 290 dental implants with a surface treated with hydrofluoric acid and passivated with hydrofluoric and nitric acid: early loading results after 2 years. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005; 10: 355-61.
  18. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Implantretained mandibular overdentures with Branemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 537-46.
  19. Douglass GL, Merin RL. The immediate dental implant. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002; 30: 362-5, 368-74.
  20. Saadoun AP, Landsberg CJ. Treatment classifications and sequencing for postextraction implant therapy: a review. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997; 9: 933-41.
  21. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991; 62: 2-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  22. Kim SG, Park CM, Kim YK, Choi GL, Oh YH, Oh HK. Multicenter retrospective clinical study of osstem US II implant system in type IV bone. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implantol. 2007; 11: 22-9.
  23. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A, Kulkarni M, Wegner B, Kuchler I. Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34: 523-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01083.x
  24. Turkyilmaz I. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Branemark implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33: 233-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00895.x
  25. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 631-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  26. De Smet E, Jaecques S, Vandamme K, Vander Sloten J, Naert I. Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bi-cortical guinea-pig model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 402-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01156.x
  27. Goodman S, Wang JS, Doshi A, Aspenberg P. Difference in bone ingrowth after one versus two daily episodes of micromotion: experiments with titanium chambers in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993; 27: 1419-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820271109
  28. Simmons CA, Valiquette N, Pilliar RM. Osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: an animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 47: 127-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199911)47:2<127::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-C
  29. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A 4-year retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 1991; 18: 719-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb00063.x
  30. Tawse-Smith A, Perio C, Payne AG, Kumara R, Thomson WM. One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001; 3: 185-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00140.x