DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Forest Management Ratio under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol: A Case Study on the Chungcheongbuk-do

교토의정서 제3조 4항의 산림경영율 추정방안 및 사례분석 - 충청북도를 대상으로 -

  • Kim, Hyungho (Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences)) ;
  • Kang, Hyeondeug (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Rae Hyun (Center of Forest and Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Cheol Min (Center of Forest and Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Koh, Kwang Chul (MetaGIS Consulting) ;
  • Lee, Kyeong Hak (Center of Forest and Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 김형호 (경상대학교 산림환경자원학과(농업생명과학연구원)) ;
  • 강현득 (경상대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 김래현 (국립산림과학원 기후변화연구센터) ;
  • 김철민 (국립산림과학원 기후변화연구센터) ;
  • 고광철 ((주)메타GIS컨설팅) ;
  • 이경학 (국립산림과학원 기후변화연구센터)
  • Received : 2013.09.15
  • Accepted : 2013.11.21
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to suggest contingent valuation method, simple random sampling method, systematic sampling method, maximum practice area method, and overlay practice area method as the estimation methods for forest management area to estimate carbon dioxide sink by forest management as stated in Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol. A case study for Chungcheongbuk-do was performed using maximum practice area method which was thought of as the most rational method within MRV(Measurable, reportable and verifiable). The forest management ratio was defined as forest management area over the total forest area. Based on the definition of forest management activity, forest area was divided into practice forest land and non-practice forest land. The area of forest mangement for practices was based on the 'National Forest Management Information System' and the history of practices from the 'Proposals on Private Management Information Database'. The area of forest management for non-practices was based on the public used forest land from 'Categorial map of forest land'. It was shown that the forest management area of Chuncheongbuk-do was 115,566 ha for practice forest land, and 131,008 ha for non-practice forest land. The forest managent ratio was 49.7% of the total forest area of 495,806 ha. This study made possible to the estimation of the forest management ratio under Kyoto Protocol, and had an advantage in searching for a practical method of forest management plan in which the forest management ratio could be enhanced.

이 연구에서는 교토의정서 제3조 4항의 산림경영활동에 따른 이산화탄소 흡수량 산정을 위한 산림경영율 추정방법으로 임의선택법, 계층추출법, 최대시업면적법, 중복시업면적법을 제시하였고, 그 중 측정 보고 검증가능한 (MRV) 방식에 있어서 현재 가장 합리적인 방법이라 판단되는 최대시업면적법을 적용하여 사례분석을 실시하였다. 산림경영율은 전체산림면적 대비 산림경영면적으로 정의될 수 있으며, 산림경영면적은 산림경영활동의 정의에 따라 전체 산림을 시업지와 제한지로 구분하였다. 시업지의 산림경영면적은 '국유림경영정보시스템'과 '사유림 경영정보 DB구축 사업'의 시업이력을 근거로, 제한지의 경우는 '산지구분도'상의 공익용 임지를 기준으로 산출되었다. 사례연구 대상지인 충청북도의 산림경영면적은 시업지 115,566 ha, 제한지 131,008 ha로 전체 산림면적 495,806 ha의 49.7%(산림경영율)로 나타났다. 이 연구는 교토의정서체계하에서의 우리나라 산림경영율을 추정할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 산림경영율을 높일 수 있는 산림경영계획과 실행방안을 찾는데 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Forestry Agency, Japan. 2011. The Report of Improvement Project for Forest Carbon Sink Inventory Information. pp. 24.
  2. Forestry Agency, Japan. (http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp)
  3. Hiroshima, T. and Nakajima, T. 2006 Estimation of Sequestered Carbon in Article-3.4 Private Planted Forests in the First Commitment Period in Japan. Journal of Forest Research 11(6): 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-006-0236-5
  4. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute), 2004. IPCC Good Practice Guidance -Land use, Land-Use Change and Forestry-. pp. 423.
  5. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2009. Climate Change & Forest. pp. 244.
  6. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2010. Annual Report on the thends of Forest and Forestry. pp. 286.
  7. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2011. The 6th National Forest Inventory and Forest Healty Survey -Field Manual Version 1.1-. pp. 59.
  8. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2012. The 42th Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. pp. 92
  9. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2013. Performance and Plan of Weekly Works (Performance: May 9-13, Plan: May 14-June 9). pp. 6.
  10. Kim, E.G. and Lee, K.H. 2010. Grobal Warming and Forest. pp. 295.
  11. Lee, K.H. and Im, J.G. 2004. Research on the 3th Korea National Report under UNFCCC. Korea Energy Economics Institute 04-23(3): 1-147.
  12. Lee, K.H., Son, Y.M., Seo, J.H., Kim, R.H., Park, I.H., Son, Y.W., and Lee, Y.J. 2006. Development of Statistical System for Forest Sector Greenhouse Gas Reporting under UNFCCC. KFRI Reseach Report 6-20. pp. 221.
  13. Matsumoto, M. 2008. Japan's Methods of FCMS for Kyoto Reporting Development of National Forest Resources Database. pp. 23.
  14. MetaGIS Consulting. 2011. Pilot Project for Forest Management Information Database. pp. 119.
  15. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. 2007. Establishment of Evaluation Methods of $CO_2$ Absorption of Forests for the First Commitment Period of the Kyoto Protocol. pp. 8.
  16. Nakajima, T., Hiroshima, T., and Amano, M. 2006. Developing Methods or Estimating Forest Areas under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol: A Case Study on Private Lands in Gifu Prefecture, Japan. Journal of the Japanese Forest Society 88(3): 181-186. https://doi.org/10.4005/jjfs.88.181
  17. NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan). 2012. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of JAPAN. 608pp.
  18. Sasaki, N. and Kim, S. 2009. Biomass Carbon Sinks in Japanese Forests: 1966-2012. Forestry 82(1): 113-123.
  19. The Government of Japan. 2008. Report on Japan's Supplementary Information on LULUCF Activities under Article 3, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Kyoto Protocol. pp. 60.

Cited by

  1. Application of National Forest Inventory Data to Estimate Forest Management Ratios for Private Forests in Chungnam Province vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.4.31
  2. Development of Forest Activity Data and Forest Management Rate for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory in the Forest Sector vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2020.11.1.53
  3. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Forest Management Activities from 1990 to 2019 to Demonstrate Additionality for Climate Change Mitigation in the Forest Sector of South Korea vol.12, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081003