International Journal of Industrial Entomology and Biomaterials

Korean Society of Sericultural Science (한국잠사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth and Osteoblastic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Silk Scaffolds

  • Cho, Hee-Yeon (lsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University) ;
  • Baik, Young-Ae (lsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University) ;
  • Jeon, Suyeon (lsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University) ;
  • Kwak, Yoon-Hae (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kweon, Hae Yong (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jo, You Young (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Kwang Gill (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Young Hwan (Department of Biosystems and Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Dongchul (lsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University)
  • Received : 2013.12.10
  • Accepted : 2013.12.16
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we compared the efficiency of osteoblast differentiation media (ODM) containing three distinct reagent combinations in osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) in monolayer culture. In addition, we analyzed growth and differentiation of hBMSCs on silk scaffolds and examined the bone-forming activity of a nanofibrous silk scaffold in a tibia diaphysis defect model of a rat hind limb with intramedullary nailing. Although all three ODM increased alkaline phosphatase activity to a comparable extent, the ODM containing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) was found to be significantly less effective in promoting mineral deposition than the others. Growth of hBMSCs on sponge-form silk scaffolds was faster than on nanofibrous ones, while osteoblastic differentiation was apparent in the cells grown on either type of scaffold. By contrast, bone formation was observed only at the edge of the nanofibrous scaffold implanted in the tibia diaphysis defect, suggesting that use of the silk scaffold alone is not sufficient for the reconstitution of the long bone defect. Since silk scaffolds can support cell growth and differentiation in vitro, loading MSCs on scaffolds might be necessary to improve the bone-forming activity of the scaffold in the long bone defect model.

Keywords

References

  1. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40, 363-408. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10
  2. Berner A, Reichert JC, Woodruff MA, Saifzadeh S, Morris AJ, Epari DR et al. (2013) Autologous vs. allogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells for the reconstruction of critical sized segmental tibial bone defects in aged sheep. Acta Biomater 9, 7874-7884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.035
  3. Cancedda R, Giannoni P, Mastrogiacomo M (2007) A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. Biomaterials 28, 4240-4250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.023
  4. Cao L, Liu G, Gan Y, Fan Q, Yang F, Zhang X et al. (2012) The use of autologous enriched bone marrow MSCs to enhance osteoporotic bone defect repair in long-term estrogendeficient goats. Biomaterials 33, 5076-5084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.069
  5. Dimarino AM, Caplan AI, Bonfield TL (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair. Front Immunol 4, 201.
  6. Drosse I, Volkmer E, Capanna R, De Biase P, Mutschler W, Schieker M (2008) Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach. Injury 39 Suppl 2, S9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(08)70011-1
  7. Gamie Z, Tran GT, Vyzas G, Korres N, Heliotis M, Mantalaris A, Tsiridis E (2012) Stem cells combined with bone graft substitutes in skeletal tissue engineering. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12, 713-729. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.679652
  8. Histing T, Garcia P, Holstein JH, Klein M, Matthys R, Nuetzi R et al. (2011) Small animal bone healing models: standards, tips, and pitfalls results of a consensus meeting. Bone 49, 591-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.007
  9. Hofmann S, Hilbe M, Fajardo RJ, Hagenmuller H, Nuss K, Arras M et al (2013) Remodeling of tissue- engineered bone structures in vivo. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 85, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.02.011
  10. Huynh KM, Soh JW, Dash R, Sarkar D, Fisher PB, Kang D (2011) FOXM1 expression mediates growth suppression during terminal differentiation of HO-1 human metastatic melanoma cells. J Cell Physiol 226, 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22326
  11. Kasoju N, Bora U (2012) Silk fibroin in tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 1, 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200097
  12. Ki CS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Jung HM, Woo KM, Lee JW et al (2008) Development of 3-D nanofibrous fibroin scaffold with high porosity by electrospinning: implications for bone regeneration. Biotechnol Lett 30, 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9581-5
  13. Kim HJ, Kim UJ, Kim HS, Li C, Wada M, Leisk GG et al. (2008) Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds. Bone 42, 1226-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.02.007
  14. Kim HJ, Kim UJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Min BH, Kaplan DL (2005) Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials 26, 4442-4452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.013
  15. Kim NR, Lee DH, Chung PH, Yang HC (2009) Distinct differentiation properties of human dental pulp cells on collagen, gelatin, and chitosan scaffolds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108, e94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.031
  16. Kirker-Head C, Karageorgiou V, Hofmann S, Fajardo R, Betz O, Merkle HP et al. (2007) BMP-silk composite matrices heal critically sized femoral defects. Bone 41, 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.04.186
  17. Kuzyk PR, Schemitsch EH, Davies JE (2010) A biodegradable scaffold for the treatment of a diaphyseal bone defect of the tibia. J Orthop Res 28, 474-480.
  18. Kweon H, Lee KG, Chae CH, Balazsi C, Min SK, Kim JY et al. (2011) Development of nano- hydroxyapatite graft with silk fibroin scaffold as a new bone substitute. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69, 1578-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.062
  19. Marsell R, Einhorn TA (2011) The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42, 551-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031
  20. Meinel L, Fajardo R, Hofmann S, Langer R, Chen J, Snyder B et al. (2005) Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. Bone 37, 688-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.010
  21. Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ, Little DG, Schindeler A (2013) Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur Cell Mater 26, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v026a09
  22. Park SY, Ki CS, Park YH, Jung HM, Woo KM, Kim HJ (2010) Electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds with macropores for bone regeneration: an in vitro and in vivo study. Tissue Eng Part A 16, 1271-1279. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0328
  23. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD et al. (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143-147. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.143
  24. Schroeder JE, Mosheiff R (2011) Tissue engineering approaches for bone repair: concepts and evidence. Injury 42, 609-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.029
  25. Sigurdsen UE, Reikeras O, Utvag SE (2009) External fixation compared to intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures in the rat. Acta Orthop 80, 375-379. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670903035567
  26. van den Bos T, Speijer D, Bank RA, Bromme D, Everts V (2008) Differences in matrix composition between calvaria and long bone in mice suggest differences in biomechanical properties and resorption: Special emphasis on collagen. Bone 43, 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.009
  27. Vepari C, Kaplan DL (2007) Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32, 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013
  28. Wang X, Wang Y, Gou W, Lu Q, Peng J, Lu S (2013) Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: a review. Int Orthop.
  29. Wang Y, Kim HJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL (2006) Stem cellbased tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 27,6064-6082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.008
  30. Wolfe M, Pochampally R, Swaney W, Reger RL (2008) Isolation and culture of bone marrow-derived human multipotent stromal cells (hMSCs). Methods Mol Biol 449, 3-25.
  31. Zhang Y, Fan W, Ma Z, Wu C, Fang W, Liu G et al. (2010) The effects of pore architecture in silk fibroin scaffolds on the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP7. Acta Biomater 6, 3021-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.030
  32. Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A (2011) Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury 42 Suppl 2, S16-21.

Cited by

  1. General characteristics of Antheraea yamamai silkworm cocoon cultured in Korea vol.53, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/jses.2015.53.1.6
  2. Effects of silk fibroin hydrolysate on bone metabolism in ovariectomized rats vol.30, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2015.30.1.17
  3. Structure and mechanical properties of Korean commercial silkworm cocoon vol.53, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/jses.2015.53.2.97
  4. Effect of ethanol concentration on the infrared spectroscopic characteristics of silk beads vol.53, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/jses.2015.53.2.118
  5. Optimal Condition of Natural Silk 3D Matrix Production by Silkworm Spinning vol.35, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2017.35.2.83